Investigating the Effect of Cultural Schemata Activation on EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension
English Language, Literature & Culture
Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2017, Pages: 99-104
Received: Sep. 24, 2017; Accepted: Oct. 19, 2017; Published: Dec. 18, 2017
Views 1531      Downloads 89
Author
Soheil Mahmoudi, English Preparatory School, Department of Foreign Languages, Uskudar University, Istanbul, Turkey
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This study tried to find the possible relationship between listeners' cultural schemata and its activation and their performance in EFL listening comprehension. The participants of this study were two groups of 37 Muslim Iranian students. Firstly, the students were divided into two groups of high and low proficiency. Then, they were exposed to two audio files, one about mosques and the other about cathedrals. In one of the classes the recording about the cathedrals was played first, but in the other the order was reversed. The collected data were inputted into the SPSS program. The null hypothesis of the study was whether listening to a culturally unfamiliar topic (cathedrals) can activate low-level learners’ schema of the culturally familiar topic (mosques). The hypothesis of the study was accepted implying that an unfamiliar text, even if it is conceptually similar, cannot activate a culturally familiar schema in the low-level students. This study has pedagogical implications for teaching listening comprehension.
Keywords
Cultural Schemata, Language Proficiency, Schema Activation, Listening Comprehension
To cite this article
Soheil Mahmoudi, Investigating the Effect of Cultural Schemata Activation on EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension, English Language, Literature & Culture. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2017, pp. 99-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20170206.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Alimohamadi, F., & Poordaryiaenejad, A. (2015). Incorporating schema in the improvement of Iranian EFL learners' L2 speaking ability. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2 (8), 100–110.
[2]
Alptekin, C. (1981). Socio-psychological and pedagogic considerations in L2 acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 15 (3), 275–284.
[3]
Al-Shumaimeri, Y. A. N. (2006). The effects of content familiarity and language ability on reading comprehension performance of low- and high-ability Saudi tertiary students studying English as a foreign language. Journal of King Saud University, 18 (2), 1–19.
[4]
Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (2000). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[5]
August, D., Francis, D. J., Hsu, H. Y. A., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Assessing reading comprehension in bilinguals. The Elementary School Journal, 107 (2), 221–238.
[6]
Bao, X. (2016). A study on schema theory-based listening teaching mode for English majors. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6 (4), 207–212.
[7]
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Bilokcuoglu, H. (2014). A schematic approach to teaching listening comprehension. ELU Journal of Sciences.
[9]
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
[10]
Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In D. J. Mendelsohn & G. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 113–131). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
[11]
Burgoyne, K., Whiteley, H. E., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2013). The role of background knowledge in text comprehension for children learning English as an additional language. Journal of Research in Reading, 36 (2), 132–148.
[12]
Carrell, P. L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33, 183–207.
[13]
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1988). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In Carrell, P. L., P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Ed.). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14]
Goh, C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30, 185–206.
[15]
Graves, M., & Cook, C. (1980). Effects of previewing difficult short stories for high school students. Research on Reading in Secondary Schools, 6, 38–54.
[16]
Hayati, A. M. (2009). The impact of cultural knowledge on listening comprehension of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 2 (3), 144–151.
[17]
Hudson, T. (1988). The effects of induced schemata on the Short Circuit in L2 reading. Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (2nd ed.) (pp. 183–205). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[18]
Mahmoudi, S., & Mahmoudi, A. (2017). Can topic familiarity override language proficiency in reading comprehension? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8 (3), 496–506.
[19]
Mai, L. H, Ngoc, L. T. B, & Thao, V. T, (2014). Enhancing listening performance through schema construction activities. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5 (5), 1042–1051.
[20]
Markham, P. L., & Latham, M. (1987). The influence of religion-specific background knowledge on listening comprehension of adult second language students. Language Learning, 37, 157–170.
[21]
Mendelsohn, D. (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.). A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 132–150). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
[22]
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256.
[23]
Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52 (2), 439–481.
[24]
Pulido, D. (2004). The effects of cultural familiarity on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. The Reading Matrix, 4 (2), 20–53.
[25]
Ridgway, T. (1997). Threshold of the background knowledge effect in foreign language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(1), 151–167.
[26]
Roller, C. M. (1990). The interaction between knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (2), 79–89.
[27]
Roller, C. M., & Matambo, A. R. (1992). Bilingual readers’ use of background knowledge in learning from text. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (1), 129–141.
[28]
Sadighi, F., & Zare, S. (2002). Is listening comprehension influenced by the background knowledge of the learners? A case study of Iranian EFL learners. The Linguistics Journal, 1(3), 110–126.
[29]
Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effect of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 78 (2), 179–189.
[30]
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.
[31]
Zhou, X. L. (2002). Application of schema theory in listening teaching. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, 2, 27–30.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931