The Teach-to-the-Test Approach: Doing Harm to the Lifelong Educational Paradigm of Algerian EFL Learners
English Language, Literature & Culture
Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages: 1-6
Received: Dec. 30, 2017;
Accepted: Jan. 20, 2018;
Published: Feb. 6, 2018
Views 2139 Downloads 165
Smail Benmoussat, Department of English, Faculty of Letters and Languages, University of Tlemcen, Tlemcen, Algeria
Nabil Djawad Benmoussat, Department of English, Faculty of Letters and Languages, University of Tlemcen, Tlemcen, Algeria
The present paper is a plea for a reconsideration of the boundaries of EFL teaching and testing within the framework of the lifelong educational paradigm. Today the educational arena dictates a new paradigm in which lifelong learning becomes indispensable. Learning is no more confined to a specific physical context: the classroom; it goes beyond the school gates. The traditional limits on where and when organized knowledge could be imparted as part of a pre-service or in-service training no longer apply. Lifelong learning has become a sine qua non condition for the establishment of a learning society. Yet, as for English Language Education, two antagonistic approaches arise. The first in which parents would most probably argue about what is best to be taught to their children as well as about the most appropriate and effective learning path leading to their offspring success in an increasingly complex world, whereas the second, in which teachers strive to cope with a delicate intertwined questioning of how to strike the balance between an effective teaching and an efficient testing. True, EFL learners in Algeria are in most need of a well-rounded education. An English Language Education geared by the “learning-how-to-learn” principle paving therefore the way for a lifelong educational paradigm.
Nabil Djawad Benmoussat,
The Teach-to-the-Test Approach: Doing Harm to the Lifelong Educational Paradigm of Algerian EFL Learners, English Language, Literature & Culture.
Vol. 3, No. 1,
2018, pp. 1-6.
BOLITHO, R. (2012). Projects and Programmes: Contemporary Experience in ELT Change Management. In HORNBERGER, N. H (Ed.) (2008) Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd Edition Springer, p. 35.
NAISBITT J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives. Warner Books: Warner Communications Company.
HARGREAVES, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. Teachers College Press. Columbia University. New York, p. 2.
KO, P. Y. (2000). From Enthusiasm to Caution. In B. ADANSON, T. KWAN and K. K. CHAN (Eds) Changing the curriculum: The impact of Reform on Primary Schooling in Honk Kong. Honk Kong: Honk Kong University Press.
GREEN, T. (1980). Predicting the Behavior of the Education System. Syrawse MY: Syrawse University Press, p. 120.
MADAUS, G. F. (1988). The Influence of Testing on the Curriculum. In TANNER, L. N. (Ed) Critical Issues in Curriculum: Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 87.
BENMOUSSAT, S. (2003). Mediating Language and Culture: An Inverstigative Analysis of the Cultural Dimension in the Algerian Newly-Designed ELT Textbook. Unpublished Doctorat d’Etat Thesis, Abou Bakr Belkaid University, Tlemcen.
SPRATT, M. (2005). Washback and the Classroom: the Implications for Teaching and Learning of Studies of Washback Exams. Language Teaching Research 9(1) 5-29.
LAM, H. P. (1994). Methodology Washback: An Insider’s View. Bringing About Change in Language Education. Honk Kong: University of Honk Kong (83-99).
UNDERHILL, N. (1982). The Great Reliability Validity Trade-off: Problems in Assessing the Productive Skill. In Heaton, J. B. (Ed) Language Testing Modern English Publications, London, 17-23.
ALDERSON, J. C. (2004). Foreword, in: L. Cheng and Y. Watanabe, with A. Curtis (Eds.) Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods (Mahwah, NJ and London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), ix-xii.
SCHWEISFURTH, M. (2011). Learner-Centered Education in Developing Country Contexts: From Solution to Problem? International Journal of Educational Development 3/ 419-26.
LEU, E. (2005). The Role of Teachers, Schools, and Communities in Quality Education: A Review of the Literature. Academy for Educational Department, Global Education center, Washington.
JAVANMARD, Y and FARAHANI, H. (2012). Investigating Using Portfolio Assessment and Learning English Language in Qum Secondary Schools. Global Journal of Human Social Sciences, Vol. 12, p. 53.
ALDERSON, J. C. and WALL, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(115-129).
HUGHES, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (2nd Ed.) Cambridge: CUP, p. 1.
CHENG, L. and WATANABE, Y. (2004). Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Publishers, pp. xi-xii.
ANDREWS, S. (1994). The Washback Effect of Examination: Its Impact Upon Curriculum Innovation in English Language Teaching. Curriculum Forum 4(1), 44-58.
CRYSTAL, D. (1997). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KACHRU, B. B. (1986). The Alchemy of the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HASMAN, M. (2000). The Future of English? A Guide to Fostering the Popularity of the English language in the 21st Century. London: The British Council.
GRADDOL, D. (2006). English Next. London: The British Council.
IBN KHALDOUN, A. (1377). El Mukkadima.
Webb, S. HOLFORD, J., HODGE, S., MILANA, M. and WALTER, R. (2017). Lifelong Learning for Quality Education. Exploring the Neglected Aspect of Sustainable Development. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 36 (5) 509-511.
CHANG, J. (2006). Globalization and English in Chinese Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford Blackwell Publishing.
BIRCH, G. J. and LIYANAGE, I. (2004). TESOL: Trojan Horse of Globalization. Research Gate. 93-102.