Computerized pre-Listening Activities and the Comprehension of English Narrative Texts.
Education Journal
Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2013, Pages: 132-137
Received: May 27, 2013; Published: Jun. 30, 2013
Views 3815      Downloads 221
Mahbube Keihaniyan, Department of English, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Article Tools
Follow on us
This study investigated 60 female and male learners in 3 groups of 20 who were selected by a Nelson test, to determine whether computerized pre listening activities, the use of key vocabulary and pictures, have a significant effect on the comprehension of English narrative texts. Also, was there any significant difference between the two computerized pre- listening activities in terms of their effect on comprehension of English narrative texts? To do this, a computer assisted language learning (CALL) software, RFLX 2013, was employed for the purpose of the study. All participants listened to four different narrative passages via a computer. Each experimental group was exposed to one of two computerized pre listening activities. After listening, subjects answered a five item true-false test and a five item multiple-choice test. Finally an ANOVA and a t-test were used to analyze the data. The results of this study showed that both types of computerized activities have significant effects on the listening comprehension of English narrative texts. Using multimedia software can help listeners to make a bridge between what they already know and what they are supposed to learn.
Computerized Activities, Pre Listening Activities, Narrative Texts, Multimedia Software
To cite this article
Mahbube Keihaniyan, Computerized pre-Listening Activities and the Comprehension of English Narrative Texts., Education Journal. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2013, pp. 132-137. doi: 10.11648/
Al-Seyghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A Comparative Study, Language Learning and Technology, 5,202-232.
Babaie, H. (2010). Image modalities in multimedia vocabulary instruction: does dual coding of vocabulary occure at different degrees? Journal of English language Studies.
Best, R. (1997). Children’s text comprehension. Effect of genre, knowledge, and text cohesion. In S.A. Barab, K. E. Hay, and D.T. Hickey (Eds.), proceedings of the seventh international conference of the learning sciences (pp.37-42).
Carrell, Patricia. L. & Eisterhold, Joan. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (4), 553-573.
Cassady, J.C., & Smith, L.L (2004). The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological.
Chun, D., & Plass, J. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.
Cunningham, A.E. (2008). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability years later. Developmental Psychology, 33: 934-945.
Dadkhah, (2002). The relationship between test anxiety and sex. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Khoramabad, Khoramabad, Iran.
Day, I. (2000). Curiosity and the Interested Explorer, performance and instruction, 21 (4), 19-22.
Foster, K.C., Erickson, G.C, Forster, D. F., Brinkman, D., & T. regensen, J.K. (2002). Computer administered instruction in phonological awareness: Evaluation of the DaisyQuest of the Daisy Quest program. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 126-137.
Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. (1982). Research Design and Statistics. Newburg house publisher INC.
Hecht, S.A., & Close, L. (2002). Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kinder gartners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 93-115.
King, S.H. and Dennis, J.R. (2003). The effect of computer-enhanced vocabulary lessons on achievement of ESL grade school children, computer in the school, 11(3), 25-32.
Lesely, T., Hansen, C., & Zukowski, J. (2005). Interchange Passages, Placement and Evaluation Package, Cambridge University Press, England.
MacArthur, C.A., Ferretti, R. P.Okolo, C.M., & Cavalier, A.R. (2007). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. Elementary School Journal, 101, 273-301.
Macaruso, P., and Walker, A. (2008). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction for advancing literacy skills in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 29,266-287.
Mitchell, M.J., & Fox, B, J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(4), 315-332.
Osborne, H. (2000), assessing readability: Rules for playing the numbers game, December.
Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and Verbal Processing, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Pavio, A., and Begg, I. (2002), Psychology of Language, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reitsma, P., &Wesseling, R. (2003). Effects of computer assisted training of blending skills in kindergartens. Scientific Studied of Reading, 2(4), 301-320.
Reynolds, C. R., & Carson, A. D. (2005). Methods for assessing cultural bias in tests. In C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 795-840). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2003). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (1983). Language and communication. London: London Group, Ltd.
Rieber, L. P. (1991). The effects of computer animated lesson presentations and cognitive practice activities on young children’s learning in physical science. In Proceedings of selected research papers presented at the Annual Meeting of Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 308833).
Stipek, D., & Ryan, R. (1997). Economically disadvantaged preschoolers: Ready to learn but further to go. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 711-723.
Wise, B. W., Ring, J., &d Olson, R. K. (2009). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197-235.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186