The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements
It is argued that learning is better and more successful when conducted in the variety spoken by students. In addition, it is claimed that the use of students’ variety in education enables students to use their own potential and helps them to achieve ‘deep learning.’ Besides, the use of students’ native dialect in education enhances the social, cognitive, emotional and linguistic development of learners’ in and out of school. For these reasons, it is argued that students need to be educated through their own variety. However, in multidialectal society, the issue of dialect and education in general and the issue of choosing the variety to be used as a Language of Instruction(LOI) in particular has been a great concern to linguists, educationalist and researchers for a long period of time (Yiakoumetti, 2007). This is because selecting the variety to be used as a LOI in multidialectal society is difficult as well as controversial. Besides, deciding the LOI largely depends on a variety of factors such as historical, economic, pedagogical, sociolinguistic, cultural, ideological, theoretical or/and political (UNESCO, 2003). For these reasons, the incorporation of dialects in educational system is questionable and contentious. This article is, therefore, intended to describe the use of dialects in education. Specifically, it will describes variations within the same language, social and regional dialects, standard and nonstandard varieties and their use in education the social evaluation of language varieties and its influence on their use in education, deficit and difference views and their influence on educational practice and the impacts of using dialects in education on students’ learning and achievements.
The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements, Education Journal.
Vol. 4, No. 5,
2015, pp. 263-269.
Adger, C. and Christian, D. (2007). Sociolinguistic variation and education. In Bayley, R. andLucas, C. (Eds). (2007). Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications (237-253) Retrieved from: WWW.Cambridge.Org/9780521871273
Adger, C., Wolfram, M. and Detwyler, J. (1993). Confronting dialect minority issues in special education: Reactive and proactive perspectives. Third National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student: Focus on middle and high school issues.
Chambers, J. K. (2008). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In Chambers, J.K, Trudgill, P. and Schilling-Estes, N. (Eds). (2008). Handbook of language variation and change (7-15). Retrieved fromhttp://www.blackwellreference.com/ subscriber/book?
Chambers, J.K. and Trudgill, P. (2004). Dialectology (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheshire, J. and Trudgill, P. (1989). Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. In Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., Munstermann, H. and Weltens., B. (Eds). (1989). Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (94-112). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Cheshire, J. (2005). Sociolinguistics and mother tongue education. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N. and Trudgill, P.(Eds). (2005). Sociolinguistics: An introductory handbook of the science of language and society (2nd) (2341-2350). Berlin: Moutonde Gruyter.
Cheshire, J.(2007). Dialect and education: Responses from sociolinguistics. In Papapavou, A. and Pavlos, P. (Eds). (2007). Sociolinguistics and pedagogical dimensions of dialect in education (14-33). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A.(Eds).(1997). Sociolinguistics: A reader and course book. New York: Pal grave Macmillan.
Curran, M.E. (2003). Linguistic diversity and classroom management. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 334-340.
Edwards, J. (1995). Multilingualism. London: Penguin Books.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. and Hyams, N 2003). An introduction to language (7ed).Boston: Michael Rosenberg
Gee, P. (2002). Educational Linguistics. In Aronoff, M. And Rees-Miller, J,. (Eds). (2002). The handbook of linguistics (485-496). Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from: http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/book?id=g9781405102520_9781405102520
Hagen, A. (1989).Dialect, Frisian and education in the Netherlands. In Cheshire et al., (Eds). (1989). Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (48-61).Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Halliday, M.A. K. and Hassan, R. (1990). Language context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to Sociolinguistics. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
Hudson, R.A. (2001). Sociolinguistics (2nd ed).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jorgensen, J.N. and Pedersen, K. M.(1989). Dialect and education in Denmark. In Cheshireetal., (Eds). (1989).Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (30-47). Philadelphia. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Kagas, T. (1999). Education of minorities. In Fishman,J.(Eds). (1999).Hand book of language and ethnic identity (42 -59).Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Labov, W. (2003). Some sociolinguistic principles. In Pauloston, B and Tucker, R. (Eds).(2003).The Sociolinguistic: The essential readings(234-301). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Lehmann, W.P. (1976). Descriptive Linguistics: An introduction. New York: Random House.
Maybin, J. (2007). Language and education. In Liamas, C., Mullany, L.,and Stockwell, P.(Eds). (2007). The Rutledge companion to Sociolinguistics (157-163). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Milroy, J.(2007). The Ideology of standard language. In Liamas et al., (Eds). (2007).The Rutledge companion to Sociolinguistics (133-139). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Mohammed, T.(2002). An exploration of students’ and teachers’ attitude towards Ebonics in a Community College Writng Program, Retrieved from: ERIC database (Ed 479490).
Papapavou, A and Pavlos, P.(Eds).(2007).Sociolinguistics and pedagogical dimensions of dialect in education. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Reaser, J. and Adger, C. (2008). Vernacular language varieties in educational settings: Research and development. In Spolisky, B. and Hult, M.(Eds). (2008).The handbook of educational Linguistics (161-173). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Romaine, S.(2000). Language in society: An introduction to Sociolinguistics (2nd ed). Oxford: OUP.
Rosenberg, P. (1989). Dialect and education in West Germany. InCheshire et al., (Eds). (1989).Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (62-93).Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Sailzmann, Z. (2007). Language, Culture and society (Fourth edition). USA: West view Press.
Solano-Flores, G. and Li, M. (2006). The use of generalizability (G) theory in the testing of linguistic minorities. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(1), 13-22.
Syal, P and Jindal, D. V. (2005). An introduction to Linguistics: Language, grammar and semantics. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
Trudgill, P. (2001). Dialects: Language workbooks. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
Ugorjii, U.C. (2005). Dialect communities and language vitality: The case of Igbo. Journal of West African Languages, 32, (1), 33-43.
UNESCO (2003). Education in a Multilingual World and Mother Tongue Education. France: UNESCO
Wardhaugh, R.(2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (6th ed). Cambridge: Blackwell Black well Publishing Ltd.
Washington, J. A. (2001). Early literacy skills in African American children: Research considerations. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 213-221.
Wolfram, et al. (1999). Dialects in schools and communities. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
Wolfram, W. (1991). Dialect differences and testing. Retrieved from: ERIC database (Ed323813).
Wolfram, W. (1998). Dialect in society. In Coulmas, F.(Ed). (1998).Hand book of sociolinguistics (75-87).Retrieved from http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?
Yiakoumetti, A. (2007). Choice of classroom language in bi-dialectal communities: To include or to exclude the dialect? Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 51-66.