| Peer-Reviewed

Moral Communication and Moral Values in the Moral Dilemma About Martha and Mary

Received: 15 May 2020    Accepted: 2 June 2020    Published: 20 June 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This article aims to investigate the integrity taking into account the relationship between culture and psychology. The conceptual framework is very sophisticated because of the wide range of studies from philosophy, education, psychology, communication, linguistic and semiotics, neurosciences, law, and so on. The multiplicity of efforts to design meta-ethics and the international needs to assume some principles and guidelines reveal the importance of the approach. The text from the Bible about Martha and Mary – a moral dilemma – becomes the start point of the investigation. The text could be considered a story, a case-study in terms of meta-ethics, a problem-solving or a hypothesis to examine moral brain. The qualitative analysis of the findings offer –despite the difficulty of moral reasoning – academically substantial inferences regarding legal decisions. For example, each judicial case could use in ethical reasoning, the similar routes of moral reasoning. The target population (660 students) was invited to critically assess the position of Martha and the position of Mary, then to explain their moral judgment behind the answer. The application stimulates moral thinking and critical thinking. To conclude, moral cognition is related to moral communication. There are various advantages for empirical work taking into account the transferability and the generalizability of findings. It is important that the formula of moral communication pretext can be adapted to suit a wide variety of research situations and various purposes.

Published in Education Journal (Volume 9, Issue 3)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Education and Moral Values: Authenticity, Countercultures and Standardization or Ethics - A New Chernobyl?

DOI 10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14
Page(s) 80-88
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Moral Communication, Moral Values, Honesty, Moral Dilemma, Moral Education, Moral Paradigm

References
[1] M. Argyle (2000). Psychology and Religion. An Introduction. London & New York: Routledge.
[2] J. Bruner (2009). Culture of education. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
[3] H. Gardner (2009). Multiple Approaches to Understanding. in Illeris (ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning. Learning Theorists... In Their Own Words (pp. 106-115). New York: Routledge.
[4] V. Trif (2020). Analyzing Paradigms Used in Education and Educational Psychology. New York: IGI Global.
[5] M. Kaptein (2005). The Six Principles of Managing with Integrity: Practical Guide for Leaders. London: Spiro, (pp. 36).
[6] V. Trif (2014). A Qualitative Perspective on Integrity. In Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Sciences, volume 2 issue 1, (pp. 38-43).
[7] M. Delgado., E. Phelps, & T. Robbins (2011). Decision Making, Affect, and Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[8] A. Sneddon (2011). Like-Minded. Externalism and Moral Psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
[9] R. Pring, R. (2008). Philosophy and Moral Education. In M. Hand & C. Winstanley (eds.), Philosophy In Schools (pp. 18-40). London and New York: Continuum.
[10] P. Hirst (1974). Knowledge and the Curriculum: a Collection of Philosophical Papers. London: Routledge.
[11] L. Tauginiene, E. Butkeviciene, K., Vohland et al. (2020). Citizen Science in the Social Sciences and Humanities: the Power of Interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications 6, 89. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y.
[12] B. Enke (2019). Kinship, Cooperation, and the Evolution of Moral Systems. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134, 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qiz001 (pages 953-1019)
[13] J. Amstrong, R. Friesdorf, P. Conway. (2019). Clarifying Gender Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments: The Complementary Roles of Harm Aversion and Action Aversion. Social Psychological and Personality Science 10, 3 Doi: 10.1177/1948550618755873 (pages 353-363).
[14] R. O., Salvador (2019). Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion. Journal of Business Ethics 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3626-z (pages 241-256).
[15] I., Patil, M. M., Zucchelli, W., Campbell, S., Fornasier, F., Calo et al. (2020). Resoning Supports Utilitarian Resolution to Moral Dilemmas across Diverse Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000281.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Victorita Trif. (2020). Moral Communication and Moral Values in the Moral Dilemma About Martha and Mary. Education Journal, 9(3), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Victorita Trif. Moral Communication and Moral Values in the Moral Dilemma About Martha and Mary. Educ. J. 2020, 9(3), 80-88. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Victorita Trif. Moral Communication and Moral Values in the Moral Dilemma About Martha and Mary. Educ J. 2020;9(3):80-88. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14,
      author = {Victorita Trif},
      title = {Moral Communication and Moral Values in the Moral Dilemma About Martha and Mary},
      journal = {Education Journal},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {80-88},
      doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20200903.14},
      abstract = {This article aims to investigate the integrity taking into account the relationship between culture and psychology. The conceptual framework is very sophisticated because of the wide range of studies from philosophy, education, psychology, communication, linguistic and semiotics, neurosciences, law, and so on. The multiplicity of efforts to design meta-ethics and the international needs to assume some principles and guidelines reveal the importance of the approach. The text from the Bible about Martha and Mary – a moral dilemma – becomes the start point of the investigation. The text could be considered a story, a case-study in terms of meta-ethics, a problem-solving or a hypothesis to examine moral brain. The qualitative analysis of the findings offer –despite the difficulty of moral reasoning – academically substantial inferences regarding legal decisions. For example, each judicial case could use in ethical reasoning, the similar routes of moral reasoning. The target population (660 students) was invited to critically assess the position of Martha and the position of Mary, then to explain their moral judgment behind the answer. The application stimulates moral thinking and critical thinking. To conclude, moral cognition is related to moral communication. There are various advantages for empirical work taking into account the transferability and the generalizability of findings. It is important that the formula of moral communication pretext can be adapted to suit a wide variety of research situations and various purposes.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Moral Communication and Moral Values in the Moral Dilemma About Martha and Mary
    AU  - Victorita Trif
    Y1  - 2020/06/20
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14
    T2  - Education Journal
    JF  - Education Journal
    JO  - Education Journal
    SP  - 80
    EP  - 88
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-2619
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20200903.14
    AB  - This article aims to investigate the integrity taking into account the relationship between culture and psychology. The conceptual framework is very sophisticated because of the wide range of studies from philosophy, education, psychology, communication, linguistic and semiotics, neurosciences, law, and so on. The multiplicity of efforts to design meta-ethics and the international needs to assume some principles and guidelines reveal the importance of the approach. The text from the Bible about Martha and Mary – a moral dilemma – becomes the start point of the investigation. The text could be considered a story, a case-study in terms of meta-ethics, a problem-solving or a hypothesis to examine moral brain. The qualitative analysis of the findings offer –despite the difficulty of moral reasoning – academically substantial inferences regarding legal decisions. For example, each judicial case could use in ethical reasoning, the similar routes of moral reasoning. The target population (660 students) was invited to critically assess the position of Martha and the position of Mary, then to explain their moral judgment behind the answer. The application stimulates moral thinking and critical thinking. To conclude, moral cognition is related to moral communication. There are various advantages for empirical work taking into account the transferability and the generalizability of findings. It is important that the formula of moral communication pretext can be adapted to suit a wide variety of research situations and various purposes.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

  • Sections