In this research the author starts from the two hypotheses that rapid changes and contemporary reality bring fear of the future to which not even students are immune, and that among students we can recognize different value orientations in relation to the past, present and future. From a sample of 189 students of Pedagogy and Teacher Education Department, it is observed that over 80% of them show certain degree of fear, whereas a factor analysis has presented that the fear is latently generated by three components: contemplation of the future, global processes and taking over the responsibility for one's own long-term goals. Among the three orientations the students are mostly orientated towards the present, then towards the future, while a certain number of them are of mixed orientations, and only one student has had insufficient orientation towards the past. Regression analysis has shown that the orientation towards the present mostly predetermines success during the studies, that is to say academic achievements. In addition to the latest findings relating to fear of the future and future orientations of students, this work offers a range of problems for research, and especially it puts forward two new instruments calibrated within strict methodological frameworks.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14 |
| Page(s) | 123-130 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fear of the Future, Future Orientations, Academic Achievements, Changes
| [1] | P. A. Hancock, “Mind, machine and morality: Toward a philosophy of human-techno¬logy symbols,” Farnham, GB: Ashgate, 2009. |
| [2] | J. H. Holland, “Adaptation in natural and artificial Systems,” Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. |
| [3] | G. Klein, “Flexecution as a paradigm for replanning.” IEEE Intelligent Systems, September/October, 2007, pp. 79–83. |
| [4] | J. Stewart, “Evolution's arrow: The direction of evolution and the future of humanity,” Canberra, Australia: The Chapman Press, 2000. |
| [5] | A. Toffler, “Future shock,” New York: Bantam Books, 1970. |
| [6] | J. J. Servan-Schreiber, “American challenge,” New York: Atheneum, 1968. |
| [7] | A. Toffler, “Future shock: The third wave,” New York: Bantam Books, 1981. |
| [8] | P. E. Spector, “The role of frustration in antisocial behavior at work,” in Anti-Social Behavior in Organizations. R. A. Jiacaolone & J. Greenberg, Eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1997, pp. 1–17. |
| [9] | B. M. Quigley, and J. T. Tedeschi, “Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, 1996, pp. 1280–1288. |
| [10] | O. Spengler, „Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte,“ München: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1922. |
| [11] | G. W. Ladd, and S. M. Profilet, “The Child Behavior Scale: A teacher-report measure of young children's aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors.” Developmental Psy¬cho¬logy, Vol. 32, 1996, pp. 1008–1024. |
| [12] | G. W. Allport, , P. E. Vernon, and G. Lindzey, “A study of values,” Boston: Houghton and Mifflin, 1960. |
| [13] | E. Spranger, “Lebensformen,” Halle: Niemeyer, 1922 |
| [14] | N. Suzić, “Educational methodology in use,” Banja Luka: XBS, 2007. |
| [15] | Bacon, L. and associates, “Using AMOSTM for structural equation modeling in market research,” www.spss.com/¬world¬wide, Read on August 13, 2010. |
| [16] | N. Suzić, “Symhedonia a la diagnosi della qualità dell'insegnante in rapporto all'inclusione,” L'integrazione scolastica e sociale (Trento) – Vol 7, 2008a, pp. 57–69. |
| [17] | N. Suzić, “Can we motivate students to memorize senseless contents.” in A. Kozlowska, R. Kahn, B. Kožuh, A. Kingston, J. Mažgon, Eds. The role of theory and research in educational practice, Grand Foks: University of North Dakota, 2008b, pp. 113–133. |
APA Style
Nenad Suzić. (2014). Futurological Orientations of Students and Fear of the Future. Science Journal of Education, 2(4), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14
ACS Style
Nenad Suzić. Futurological Orientations of Students and Fear of the Future. Sci. J. Educ. 2014, 2(4), 123-130. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14,
author = {Nenad Suzić},
title = {Futurological Orientations of Students and Fear of the Future},
journal = {Science Journal of Education},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {123-130},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20140204.14},
abstract = {In this research the author starts from the two hypotheses that rapid changes and contemporary reality bring fear of the future to which not even students are immune, and that among students we can recognize different value orientations in relation to the past, present and future. From a sample of 189 students of Pedagogy and Teacher Education Department, it is observed that over 80% of them show certain degree of fear, whereas a factor analysis has presented that the fear is latently generated by three components: contemplation of the future, global processes and taking over the responsibility for one's own long-term goals. Among the three orientations the students are mostly orientated towards the present, then towards the future, while a certain number of them are of mixed orientations, and only one student has had insufficient orientation towards the past. Regression analysis has shown that the orientation towards the present mostly predetermines success during the studies, that is to say academic achievements. In addition to the latest findings relating to fear of the future and future orientations of students, this work offers a range of problems for research, and especially it puts forward two new instruments calibrated within strict methodological frameworks.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Futurological Orientations of Students and Fear of the Future AU - Nenad Suzić Y1 - 2014/08/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 123 EP - 130 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140204.14 AB - In this research the author starts from the two hypotheses that rapid changes and contemporary reality bring fear of the future to which not even students are immune, and that among students we can recognize different value orientations in relation to the past, present and future. From a sample of 189 students of Pedagogy and Teacher Education Department, it is observed that over 80% of them show certain degree of fear, whereas a factor analysis has presented that the fear is latently generated by three components: contemplation of the future, global processes and taking over the responsibility for one's own long-term goals. Among the three orientations the students are mostly orientated towards the present, then towards the future, while a certain number of them are of mixed orientations, and only one student has had insufficient orientation towards the past. Regression analysis has shown that the orientation towards the present mostly predetermines success during the studies, that is to say academic achievements. In addition to the latest findings relating to fear of the future and future orientations of students, this work offers a range of problems for research, and especially it puts forward two new instruments calibrated within strict methodological frameworks. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: