Authoritative Questioning and Science Teaching in Saudi Arabian Context
Science Journal of Education
Volume 3, Issue 3, June 2015, Pages: 43-49
Received: Apr. 22, 2015; Accepted: May 4, 2015; Published: May 12, 2015
Views 4384      Downloads 142
Author
Saeed Almuntasheri, School of Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This qualitative study reports on the features of two teachers’ questioning practices when teaching density for grade-six science elementary students. By adapting IRE questioning framework, this paper investigated issues in relation to the use of questioning as formative assessment strategy. The data revealed that teachers used authoritative questions to keep classroom interactions focused on what they expected to hear. The questioning implementations showed that teachers were unaware of students’ conceptual change. It also revealed that teachers employed scaffolding strategies that support their authority. Implications for science educators include the need to develop appropriate models for teacher-student interactions that consider student contributions and encourage more dialogic teaching.
Keywords
Authority, Questioning, Scaffolding, Science Conceptions
To cite this article
Saeed Almuntasheri, Authoritative Questioning and Science Teaching in Saudi Arabian Context, Science Journal of Education. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 43-49. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150303.11
References
[1]
Alexander, R. (2005). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy.Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology. University of Durham, UK.
[2]
Alonso-Tapia, J. (2002).Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. In M. Limon, & L. Mason (Eds.), Knowledge assessment and conceptual understanding (pp. 389-413). Madrid,Spain: Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[3]
Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? a consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 35-49. doi: 10.1080/0305764042000183115
[4]
Buty, C., & Mortimer, E. F. (2008). Dialogic/authoritative discourse and modelling in a high school teaching sequence on optics. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1635-1660.
[5]
Bybee, R. W. (2009,January). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and the Development of 21st Century Skills, National Research Council. Washington.
[6]
Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in Classrooms: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157. doi: 10.2307/1170533
[7]
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. doi: 10.1002/tea.20171
[8]
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230-284. doi: 10.1080/10508400903530036.
[9]
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
[10]
Elliot, A. (1994). Teaching Questioning and Learning. Teaching Education, 6(1), 183-184. doi: 10.1080/1047621940060124
[11]
Fulmer, G. W. (2013). Constraints on Conceptual Change: How Elementary Teachers’ Attitudes and Understanding of Conceptual Change Relate to Changes in Students’ Conceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1219-1236. doi: 10.1007/s10972-013-9334-3.
[12]
Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453-467. doi: 10.1002/sce.20130.
[13]
Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers' enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181-1210. doi: 10.1002/tea.21054.
[14]
Grosslight, L., Maclin, D., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for Understanding: A Study of Students' Preinstruction Theories of Matter and a Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Teaching About Matter and Density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 317-393. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_2.
[15]
Hogan, K. E., & Pressley, M. E. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues: Brookline Books.
[16]
Hyman, R. T. (1980). Fielding Student Questions. Theory into Practice, 19(1), 38-44. doi: 10.1080/00405848009542870.
[17]
Kearsley, G. P. (1976). Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(4), 355-375.
[18]
Keeley, P. (2013). Is it melting? Formative assessment for teacher learning. Science and Children, 51(3), 26.
[19]
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, N.J: Ablex.
[20]
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In: H.W. Seliger & M.H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition(pp.268-285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
[21]
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
[22]
Myhill, D., & Dunkin, F. (2005). Questioning Learning. Language and Education, 19(5), 415-427. doi: 10.1080/09500780508668694.
[23]
O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318-318.
[24]
Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving Teacher Questioning in Science Inquiry Discussions Through Professional Development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422-453. doi: 10.1002/tea.20345
[25]
Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S. N., Stamelos, I. G., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2011). The value of writing-to-learn when using question prompts to support web-based learning in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 71-90. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9167-0.
[26]
Pol, v. d. J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.
[27]
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207.
[28]
Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. In In D.Preiss & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163-194). New York, NY: Springer.
[29]
Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). RESEARCH REPORT: Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3-24.
[30]
Ruiz-Primo, & Furtak. (2006). Informal formative Assessment and scientific Inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3-4), 237-263.
[31]
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714.
[32]
Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In Hassaskhah J. (ed.), Educational Theory (pp. 39-61). New York: Nova.
[33]
Van Zee, & Minstrell. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227-269.
[34]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[35]
Wang, C. H. (2005). Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 303-313.
[36]
Wolfe, S., & Alexander, R. J. (2008). Argumentation and dialogic teaching: alternative pedagogies for a changing world. London, UK: FutureLab (Beyond Current Horizons).
[37]
Wu, K.-y. (1993). Classroom interaction and teacher questions revisited. RELC Journal, 24(2), 49-68.
[38]
Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2014). Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531-552. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.787556.
[39]
Yip, D. Y. (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 76-83.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186