Please enter verification code
Confirm
Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making
Science Journal of Education
Volume 4, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages: 175-180
Received: Oct. 18, 2016; Accepted: Oct. 26, 2016; Published: Nov. 15, 2016
Views 3537      Downloads 99
Authors
Zhen Wang, The office of the Development Commission, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
Le Sheng Jin, Business School, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Evaluation functions are very crucial in educational comprehensive evaluation. This study summarizes some classical evaluation functions and shows their usage in Pedagogic evaluation applications. The study also presents and illustrates some hybrid evaluation function with some types of preferences of decision makers involved. Some illustrations with examples show that different types of preferences can embody both educators’ teaching experience and their optimism/pessimism decision attitudes. Therefore, the analyses in this study can help first line teachers select suitable, flexible and reasonable models for their practical educational comprehensive evaluations.
Keywords
Aggregation Functions, Choquet Integrals, Decision Making, Pedagogic Management, Educational Evaluation, OWA Operators
To cite this article
Zhen Wang, Le Sheng Jin, Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making, Science Journal of Education. Vol. 4, No. 6, 2016, pp. 175-180. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
M. Grabisch, J. L. Marichal, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Aggregation Functions, Cambridge University Press 2009, ISBN: 1107013429.
[2]
W. K. Hoy, C. G. Miskel, Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8e 0-073-40374-1 2007 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
[3]
L. Jin, Vector t-norms with applications, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2617371.
[4]
L. Jin, M. Kalina, G. Qian, Discrete and continuous recursive forms for OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst. DOI 10.1016/j.fss.2016.04.017.
[5]
L. Jin, G. Qian, OWA Generation Function and some adjustment methods for OWA operators with Application, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24 (1) (2016) 168 – 178.
[6]
E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Triangular norms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000.
[7]
M. P. Lojo, Improving Undergraduate Student Performance on the Littlefield Simulation, INFORMS Trans. Educ. 16 (2) (2016) 54–59.
[8]
A. K. Singh, A. Kishor, N. R. Pal. Stancu OWA Operator, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23 (2015) 1306–1313.
[9]
M. Sugeno, Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and Its Applications. PhD. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1974.
[10]
D. Tsompanoudi, M. Satratzemi, S. Xinogalos, Evaluating the Effects of Scripted Distributed Pair Programming on Student Performance and Participation, IEEE Trans. Educ. 59 (1) (2016) 24–31.
[11]
R. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18 (1) (1988) 183–190.
[12]
R. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, G. Beliakov, Recent Developments on the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186