Whatsoever the future, it will not be as visualized. The education development of 2018 is completely different from that of 1918, or of 1981, and imagining future situations is not consequently informal. The potential dreams become out-of-date faster than estimated. No one can tie a fixed configuration of the future. And such a situation either progressive or toxic, depends on its position in the world, and as well as the geopolitical and multicultural aspect - which world occurred to have as all live. The world today is global, soft, cybernetic and polycentric. The change from traditional mass media to a system of straight communication networks, controlled around the world via the Internet and wireless communication has certainly brought a change that became the foundation of essential progressive revolution. This article briefly discusses the use of modern technological developments and the concept of globalization for learning. In the first part, a brief introduction of the learning is discussed; the second and third parts briefly touch different methods of learning. How these methods are used for the learning process by a tutor has also been presented and demonstrated in this article. The result in each section of the article shows that among numerous teaching and learning strategies, only four are recommended for each tutor and learner.
Saeed Ullah Jan,
Education in the Age of Technology: Contrasting Fortunes, Science Journal of Education.
Vol. 6, No. 2,
2018, pp. 55-70.
Altbach, P. G., Berdahl, R. O., & Gumport, P. J. (Eds.). (2011). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Paris, FR: UNESCO & Sense Publishers.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P.,... & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. New York. Longman Publishing. Artz, AF, & Armour-Thomas, E.(1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. New York. Longman Publishing. Artz, AF, & Armour-Thomas, E.(1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175.
Barber, B. R. (1995). Jihad vs McWorld. New York: Times Books.
Barber, M. (2001). High expectations and standards for all, no matter what: Creating a world-class education service in England. In M. Fielding (Ed.), Taking Education Really Seriously: Four years hard labor. New York: Routledge/Falmer Press.
Barber, M., Donnelly, K., Rizvi, S., & Summers, L. (2013). An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead. London, UK: Institute for Public Policy Research. Retrieved from http:// www.ippr.org/publication/55/10432/anavalanche- is-coming-higher-education and- the-revolution-ahead.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Oxford: Basil Blackwells.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). Capitalism and Social Progress: The future of society in a global economy. Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave.
Carnoy, M. & Castells, M., ‘Sustainable Flexibility: A prospective study on work, family, and society in the information age', OECD Working Paper, V (29), Paris: OECD, p. 33.
Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). ‘Teacher Learning Communities’. Review of Research in Education, 24, 24-32.
Coleman, J. (1988). ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement), 595-620.
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending Educational Reform: From one school to many. London: Falmer/Routledge Press.
Duffy, T. M., & Raymer, P. L. (2010). A practical guide and a constructivist rationale for inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology, 50(4), 3-15.
Earl, L., & Katz, S. (in press). ‘Leading schools in a data-rich world'. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, K. S. Louis, G. Furman-Brown, P. Gronn, B. Mulford, & K. Riley (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jeffrey, B., & Woods, P. (1996). ‘Feeling Deprofessionalized: The Social Construction of Emotions During an OFSTED Inspection’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 126(3), 235-343.
Jan, Saeed Ullah (2017). An Improved Lightweight Privacy Preserving Authentication Scheme for SIP-Based-VoIP Using Smart Card. Anchor Academic Publishing
Jan, S. U. (2017). An Improved Lightweight Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for SIP-Based-VoIP Using Smart Card. Anchor Academic Publishing. Retrieved from http://jankp.com/downloads/15-My%20Book.pdf
King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2001). ‘Building School Capacity Through Professional Development: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations’. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86-93.
Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19. Retrieved from http:// robertkozma.com/images/kozma_will_media_influence.pdf
Little, J. W. (2001). ‘Professional Development in Pursuit of School Reform’. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.
Merrill, M. D. (2007). First principles of instruction: A synthesis. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 62-71). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 41-56). New York: Routledge.
Sanyal, B. C., & Martin, M. (2007). Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview. In J. Tres & Global University Network for Innovation (Eds.), Higher education in the world 2007: Accreditation for quality assurance: What is at stake? (2nd ed., pp. 3-17). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stoll, L. (1999). ‘Realizing our Potential: Understanding and Developing Capacity for Lasting Improvement’. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 503-532.
Vail, J. (1999). ‘Insecure Times’. In J. Vail, J. Wheelock, & M. Hill (Eds.), Insecure Times: Living with insecurity in contemporary society. New York: Routledge.
Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. L. (Eds.). (2000). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Challenges to Implementation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Wylie, C. (1994). Self-Managing Schools in New Zealand: The Fifth Year. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Jan, S. U., & Fazal, K. (2018). An Improved Forest Fire Alerting System Using Wireless Sensor Network. Advances in Networks, 6(1), 21-39, https://doi.org/ 10.11648/j.net.20180601.13.
Jan, S. U., & Qayum, F. (2018). A Robust Authentication Scheme for Client-Server Architecture With Provable Security Analysis. Network and Communication Technologies, 3(1), 6.
Jan, S. U. (2017). An Improved Lightweight Privacy Preserving Authentication Scheme for SIP-Based-VoIP Using Smart Card. Anchor Academic Publishing.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.