Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students
Science Journal of Education
Volume 3, Issue 4-1, August 2015, Pages: 5-10
Received: May 16, 2015; Accepted: May 18, 2015; Published: May 27, 2015
Views 4085      Downloads 71
Author
S. D. Thanga Shyla, Department of Education, St. Joseph University in Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Education is a process as well as a product. To create good product out of education it must be consistent reconstruction. The aim of education should, educate for vocation, knowledge, culture, with the qualitative process of methodologies. Education must have a good method in its systems, especially teaching and learning, so that effective and desirable end products are evolved. Hence quality improvement in educational methodology, whether in teaching or learning, often comes under the purview of educational character, leisure, spiritualism, individual development, social efficiency, complete living. For building up a new generation of men and women, committed to the process of modernization, an appropriate training and motivation of the individuals is impressive. All this is possible through the medium of sound system of education, which needs a dynamic change. Continuous Assessment Test (CAT) will help the student to improve their cognitive development and confidence.
Keywords
Education, Formative Assessment, Continuous Assessment Test
To cite this article
S. D. Thanga Shyla, Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students, Science Journal of Education. Special Issue: Science Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 3, No. 4-1, 2015, pp. 5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12
References
[1]
Marlow & Rao, Bhaskara D. (2006). Philosophy and curriculum. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.
[2]
Good, Carter V. (1973). Dictionary of education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
[3]
Good, Thomas L. (2008). 21st century education: A reference handbook, Vol 1. New Delhi: A Sage reference publications
[4]
Guskey, Thomas R. (1997). Implementing mastery learning (2nd ed.). California, Wadsworth.
[5]
Shyla, S. D. Thanga & Dharma Raja, B. William. (2013). Academic Performance of Pre-service Elementary Teachers in Child Psychology through Computer Supplemented Mastery Learning. Dissertation, Tirunelveli: Manonmaniam Sundaranar University.
[6]
Sypher, J. R. (2004). Art of teaching school. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.
[7]
Thomas, H. K., Harrison, F., & Calkins, N. A. (2005). How to teach. NewDelhi: Cosmo Publications.
[8]
UNESCO Report. (1996). Learning: the treasure within. pp: 141- 142
[9]
Assessing Your Teaching. Center for Teaching & Learning Excellence, the University of Utah. Accessed 26 January 2010. http://www.ctle.utah.edu/?&pageId=2009
[10]
Centra, John A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[11]
Chan C.(2010) Assessment: Evaluating your own Teaching, Assessment resources@HKU, University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://ar.cetl.hku.hk on 25 September 2014.
[12]
Fink, D. L. (1995). Evaluating your own teaching Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Inc.
[13]
Seldin, Peter & Associates. (1990). How administrators can improve teaching: Moving from talk to action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[14]
Seldin, Peter (Ed.), Improving college teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Inc.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186