Science Journal of Education

| Peer-Reviewed |

Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students

Received: 16 May 2015    Accepted: 18 May 2015    Published: 27 May 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Education is a process as well as a product. To create good product out of education it must be consistent reconstruction. The aim of education should, educate for vocation, knowledge, culture, with the qualitative process of methodologies. Education must have a good method in its systems, especially teaching and learning, so that effective and desirable end products are evolved. Hence quality improvement in educational methodology, whether in teaching or learning, often comes under the purview of educational character, leisure, spiritualism, individual development, social efficiency, complete living. For building up a new generation of men and women, committed to the process of modernization, an appropriate training and motivation of the individuals is impressive. All this is possible through the medium of sound system of education, which needs a dynamic change. Continuous Assessment Test (CAT) will help the student to improve their cognitive development and confidence.

DOI 10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12
Published in Science Journal of Education (Volume 3, Issue 4-1, August 2015)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Science Learning in Higher Education

Page(s) 5-10
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Education, Formative Assessment, Continuous Assessment Test

References
[1] Marlow & Rao, Bhaskara D. (2006). Philosophy and curriculum. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.
[2] Good, Carter V. (1973). Dictionary of education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
[3] Good, Thomas L. (2008). 21st century education: A reference handbook, Vol 1. New Delhi: A Sage reference publications
[4] Guskey, Thomas R. (1997). Implementing mastery learning (2nd ed.). California, Wadsworth.
[5] Shyla, S. D. Thanga & Dharma Raja, B. William. (2013). Academic Performance of Pre-service Elementary Teachers in Child Psychology through Computer Supplemented Mastery Learning. Dissertation, Tirunelveli: Manonmaniam Sundaranar University.
[6] Sypher, J. R. (2004). Art of teaching school. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.
[7] Thomas, H. K., Harrison, F., & Calkins, N. A. (2005). How to teach. NewDelhi: Cosmo Publications.
[8] UNESCO Report. (1996). Learning: the treasure within. pp: 141- 142
[9] Assessing Your Teaching. Center for Teaching & Learning Excellence, the University of Utah. Accessed 26 January 2010. http://www.ctle.utah.edu/?&pageId=2009
[10] Centra, John A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[11] Chan C.(2010) Assessment: Evaluating your own Teaching, Assessment resources@HKU, University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://ar.cetl.hku.hk on 25 September 2014.
[12] Fink, D. L. (1995). Evaluating your own teaching Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Inc.
[13] Seldin, Peter & Associates. (1990). How administrators can improve teaching: Moving from talk to action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[14] Seldin, Peter (Ed.), Improving college teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Inc.
Author Information
  • Department of Education, St. Joseph University in Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    S. D. Thanga Shyla. (2015). Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students. Science Journal of Education, 3(4-1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    S. D. Thanga Shyla. Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students. Sci. J. Educ. 2015, 3(4-1), 5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    S. D. Thanga Shyla. Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students. Sci J Educ. 2015;3(4-1):5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12,
      author = {S. D. Thanga Shyla},
      title = {Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students},
      journal = {Science Journal of Education},
      volume = {3},
      number = {4-1},
      pages = {5-10},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12},
      abstract = {Education is a process as well as a product. To create good product out of education it must be consistent reconstruction. The aim of education should, educate for vocation, knowledge, culture, with the qualitative process of methodologies. Education must have a good method in its systems, especially teaching and learning, so that effective and desirable end products are evolved. Hence quality improvement in educational methodology, whether in teaching or learning, often comes under the purview of educational character, leisure, spiritualism, individual development, social efficiency, complete living. For building up a new generation of men and women, committed to the process of modernization, an appropriate training and motivation of the individuals is impressive. All this is possible through the medium of sound system of education, which needs a dynamic change. Continuous Assessment Test (CAT) will help the student to improve their cognitive development and confidence.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Impact of Formative Assessment: Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Bachelor of Science in Education Students
    AU  - S. D. Thanga Shyla
    Y1  - 2015/05/27
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12
    T2  - Science Journal of Education
    JF  - Science Journal of Education
    JO  - Science Journal of Education
    SP  - 5
    EP  - 10
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-0897
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.12
    AB  - Education is a process as well as a product. To create good product out of education it must be consistent reconstruction. The aim of education should, educate for vocation, knowledge, culture, with the qualitative process of methodologies. Education must have a good method in its systems, especially teaching and learning, so that effective and desirable end products are evolved. Hence quality improvement in educational methodology, whether in teaching or learning, often comes under the purview of educational character, leisure, spiritualism, individual development, social efficiency, complete living. For building up a new generation of men and women, committed to the process of modernization, an appropriate training and motivation of the individuals is impressive. All this is possible through the medium of sound system of education, which needs a dynamic change. Continuous Assessment Test (CAT) will help the student to improve their cognitive development and confidence.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 4-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections