Importance of Computer Assisted Teaching & Learning Methods for Chemistry
Science Journal of Education
Volume 3, Issue 4-1, August 2015, Pages: 11-16
Received: May 11, 2015; Accepted: May 22, 2015; Published: Jun. 1, 2015
Views 32179      Downloads 301
Jesuraja Bosco Bharathy, Department of Education, DMI-St.Joseph University, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
Article Tools
Follow on us
Understanding the basic concepts of chemistry is very important for the students of secondary school level and university level. The Computer Assisted Teaching and Learning (CATL) methods are marked by the usage of computers in teaching and learning processes. Usage of WORD, EXCEL, POWERPOINT, ACCESS, PHOTOSHOP etc., as well as the use of specialized packages such as CHEMDRAW, SCIFINDER etc., can be worth mentioning. The role of internet in feeding the thirst of students is comparably far better than the classroom teaching. By the use of CATL methods, students can acquire high quality of mental models.
CATL, Computer, Internet, Multimedia, Cognitive Load, Audio, Video, Mental Models
To cite this article
Jesuraja Bosco Bharathy, Importance of Computer Assisted Teaching & Learning Methods for Chemistry, Science Journal of Education. Special Issue: Science Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 3, No. 4-1, 2015, pp. 11-16. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.13
T. Altun , “Information and communication technology in initial teacher education: What can turkey learn from range of international perspectives?,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 45-60, 2007.
K. A. Burke., T. J. Greenbowe and M.A. Windschitl, “Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction,” Journal of Chemical Education, 75, (12), 1658-1660, 1998.
Dasdemir., K. Doymus., U. Simsek and A. Karacop, “The Effect of animation technique on teaching of acids and bases topics,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(2), 60-69, 2008.
R. K. Lowe, “Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamics graphics,” Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157-176, 2003.
A. V. Marcano., V. M. Williamson., G. Ashkenazi., R. Tasker and K. C. Williamson, “The use of video demonstrations and particulate animation in general chemistry,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 315-323, 2004.
M.B. Nakhleh, “Why some students don’t learn chemistry,” Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196, 1992.
S. Abdullah and A. Shariff, “The effect of inquiry based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking conceptual understanding of gas laws,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematical, Science and Technology Education, 4(4), 387-398, 2008.
D. Ardac and S. Akaygun, “Effectiveness of multimedia based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on student’s understanding of chemical change,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317-337, 2004.
R. B. Kozma and J. Russell, “Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949-968, 1997.
R.E. Mayer, “The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media,” Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139, 2003.
J.W. Russell and R.B. Kozma, “4M:Chem-multimedia and mental models in chemistry,” Journal of Chemical Education, 71(8), 669-670, 1994.
D.J. Stevens., L. Aech and C. Katkanant, “An interactive videodisc and laboratory instructional approach in a high school science class,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20,303-309, 1988.
H.K. Wu., J.S. Krajcik and E. Soloway, “Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Student’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom,” Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842, 2001. s
P. A. Basili, and J. P. Sanford, “Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry,” Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching,28, 293-304, 1991.
J.W. Russell., R.B. Kozma., T. Jones., J. Wykoff., N. Marx,N and J. Davis, “Use of simultaneous-synchronized macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teaching and learning of chemical concepts,” Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330-334, 1997.
R. Ben-zvi, B. Eylon and J. Silberstein, “Students’ visualisation of a chemical reaction,” Education in Chemistry, 24, 117-120, 1987.
A. Paivio, “Mental representations: A dual coding approach” Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press. 1986.
P. Johnson-Laird, “Mental models”, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
P. Chandler and J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction,” Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332, 1991.
H. Lee., J. L. Plass and B. D. Homer, “Optimize cognitive load for learning from computer based science simulations,” Journal of Education Psychology, 98(4), 902-913, 2006.
J.M. Clark and A. Paivio, “Dual coding theory and education,” Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149- 210, 1991.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186