Evaluation functions are very crucial in educational comprehensive evaluation. This study summarizes some classical evaluation functions and shows their usage in Pedagogic evaluation applications. The study also presents and illustrates some hybrid evaluation function with some types of preferences of decision makers involved. Some illustrations with examples show that different types of preferences can embody both educators’ teaching experience and their optimism/pessimism decision attitudes. Therefore, the analyses in this study can help first line teachers select suitable, flexible and reasonable models for their practical educational comprehensive evaluations.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 4, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12 |
| Page(s) | 175-180 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Aggregation Functions, Choquet Integrals, Decision Making, Pedagogic Management, Educational Evaluation, OWA Operators
| [1] | M. Grabisch, J. L. Marichal, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Aggregation Functions, Cambridge University Press 2009, ISBN: 1107013429. |
| [2] | W. K. Hoy, C. G. Miskel, Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8e 0-073-40374-1 2007 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. |
| [3] | L. Jin, Vector t-norms with applications, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2617371. |
| [4] | L. Jin, M. Kalina, G. Qian, Discrete and continuous recursive forms for OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst. DOI 10.1016/j.fss.2016.04.017. |
| [5] | L. Jin, G. Qian, OWA Generation Function and some adjustment methods for OWA operators with Application, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24 (1) (2016) 168 – 178. |
| [6] | E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Triangular norms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000. |
| [7] | M. P. Lojo, Improving Undergraduate Student Performance on the Littlefield Simulation, INFORMS Trans. Educ. 16 (2) (2016) 54–59. |
| [8] | A. K. Singh, A. Kishor, N. R. Pal. Stancu OWA Operator, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23 (2015) 1306–1313. |
| [9] | M. Sugeno, Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and Its Applications. PhD. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1974. |
| [10] | D. Tsompanoudi, M. Satratzemi, S. Xinogalos, Evaluating the Effects of Scripted Distributed Pair Programming on Student Performance and Participation, IEEE Trans. Educ. 59 (1) (2016) 24–31. |
| [11] | R. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18 (1) (1988) 183–190. |
| [12] | R. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, G. Beliakov, Recent Developments on the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011. |
APA Style
Zhen Wang, Le Sheng Jin. (2016). Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making. Science Journal of Education, 4(6), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12
ACS Style
Zhen Wang; Le Sheng Jin. Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making. Sci. J. Educ. 2016, 4(6), 175-180. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12
AMA Style
Zhen Wang, Le Sheng Jin. Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making. Sci J Educ. 2016;4(6):175-180. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12,
author = {Zhen Wang and Le Sheng Jin},
title = {Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making},
journal = {Science Journal of Education},
volume = {4},
number = {6},
pages = {175-180},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20160406.12},
abstract = {Evaluation functions are very crucial in educational comprehensive evaluation. This study summarizes some classical evaluation functions and shows their usage in Pedagogic evaluation applications. The study also presents and illustrates some hybrid evaluation function with some types of preferences of decision makers involved. Some illustrations with examples show that different types of preferences can embody both educators’ teaching experience and their optimism/pessimism decision attitudes. Therefore, the analyses in this study can help first line teachers select suitable, flexible and reasonable models for their practical educational comprehensive evaluations.},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Preferences Involved Comprehensive Evaluation in Educational Management and Decision Making AU - Zhen Wang AU - Le Sheng Jin Y1 - 2016/11/15 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 175 EP - 180 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160406.12 AB - Evaluation functions are very crucial in educational comprehensive evaluation. This study summarizes some classical evaluation functions and shows their usage in Pedagogic evaluation applications. The study also presents and illustrates some hybrid evaluation function with some types of preferences of decision makers involved. Some illustrations with examples show that different types of preferences can embody both educators’ teaching experience and their optimism/pessimism decision attitudes. Therefore, the analyses in this study can help first line teachers select suitable, flexible and reasonable models for their practical educational comprehensive evaluations. VL - 4 IS - 6 ER -
Information
Email: