| Peer-Reviewed

The Consequences of Neglect in Children: Neurocognitive Comparisons Among Conduct Disordered and Non-Conduct Disordered Youth Residing in Foster-Care with That of Children from Intact Families

Received: 27 May 2013    Accepted:     Published: 30 June 2013
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Children (n = 85) between the ages of 6 and 16 were administered two tests of source monitoring proficiency, one an external source test and the second an internal source test. In addition, the children were assessed using the Children's Category Test (CCT), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The primary interest was to compare the source monitoring and cognitive processes of children in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder and children in foster care without a psychiatric diagnosis. In addition, a group consisting of children living with their parents was included for comparative purposes. For the primary analyses, the dependent variables consisted of raw ISM and ESM scores, full-scale IQ, measures of working memory and processing speed, and the total and perseverative error measures of the WCST. First, because age differences were expected, a MANOVA was used with the age of the subject grouped into three categories of 6 to 8-, 9 to 12-, and 13 to 16-year olds. Following the verification of age differences on the dependent measures, a MANCOVA was used to examine the influence of abuse/neglect by comparing individuals in foster care, with and without a psychiatric diagnosis. Therefore, the study comprised three groups: (1) a group of children living at home with the parents and serving as a comparison group, (2) a control group consisting of children living in foster care but with no psychiatric diagnosis, and (3) a group of children living in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder. Age, as a continuous variable, served as the covariate. ISM scores revealed that both of the control groups differed from the foster care / conduct disorder group, with scores in the foster care control group comparable to that of the intact family comparison group. The intact family comparison group had significantly higher FS-IQ scores than either foster care group. In addition, FS-IQ scores in the foster care control group were intermediate between that of the intact family comparison and conduct disorder groups. Children in the intact family comparison group made significantly fewer total errors and perseverative errors than either foster care group. However, the number of perseverative errors for the two foster care groups was comparable.

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13
Page(s) 96-105
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Conduct Disorder, Memory, Executive Function, Foster-Care

References
[1] Seguin, J. R., Boulerice, B., Harden, P. W., Tremblay, R. E., & Pihl, R. O. Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory and IQ. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 1999;40(8):1197-1208.
[2] Stieben, J., Lewis, M. D., Granic, I., Zelazo, P. D., Segalowitz, S., & Peplera, D. Neurophysiological mechanisms of emotion regulation for subtypes of externalizing children. Development and Psychopathology, 2007; 19:455-80.
[3] Caramaschi, D., de Boer, S. F., de Vries, H., & Koolhaas, J. M. Development of violence in mice through repeated victory along with changes in prefrontal cortex neurochemistry. Behavioural Brain Research, 2008;189:263-72.
[4] Hawkins, K. A., & Trobst, K. K. Frontal lobe dysfunction and aggression: Conceptual issues and research findings. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2000;5: 147-57.
[5] Dahl, R. E. Affect regulation, brain development, and behavioral0emotional health in adolescence. CNS Spectrums, 2001;6: 60-72.
[6] Grafman, J., Schwab, K.,Warden, D.,& Pridgen, A. Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: A report of the Vietnam head injury study. Neurology, 1996;46:1231-38.
[7] Volkow, N. D., & Tancredi, L. Neural substrates of violent behaviour: A preliminary study with positron emission tomography. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987;151:668-73.
[8] Damasio, A. R., Grabowski, T. J., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Ponto, L. L. B., Parvizi, J., et al. Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neuroscience, 2000; 3:1049-56.
[9] Blair, R. J. R. Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 2001;71:727-31.
[10] Rolls, E. T. The Brain and emotion. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
[11] Rolls, E. T. Emotion explained. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005.
[12] Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Harari, H., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Levkovitz, Y. The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies. Cortex, 2010;46:668-77.
[13] Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004; 8:539-46.
[14] Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. Developing mechanisms of self-regulation. Development and Psychopathology, 2000;12:427-41.
[15] Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., Turner, H., & Hamby, S. L. The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreatment, 2005;10:5-25.
[16] Perkins, S., & Graham-Bermann, S. Violence exposure and the development of school-related functioning: Mental health, neurocognition, and learning. Aggression and Violent Behavior,2012;17:89-98.
[17] Andersen, S., Tomada, A., Vincow, E., Valente, E., Polcari, A., & Teicher, M. Preliminary evidence for sensitive periods in the effect of childhood sexual abuse on regional brain development. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2008;20:292-301.
[18] Choi, J., Jeong, B., Rohan, M., Polcari, A., & Teicher, M. Preliminary evidence for white matter tract abnormalities in young adults exposed to parental verbal abuse. Biological Psychiatry,2009;65:227-34.
[19] Miskovic, V., Schmidt, L., Georgiades, K., Boyle, M., & Macmillan, H. Adolescent females exposed to child maltreatment exhibit atypical EEG coherence and psychiatric impairment: Linking early adversity, the brain, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2010;22:419-32.
[20] Seckfort, D. Paul, R., Grieve, S.M., Vandenberg, B, Byrant, R., Williams, L.M., Clark, C.R., Cohen, R.A., Bruce, S. E., & Gordon, E. The impact of early life stress on brain structure and function across the lifespan. Brain Imaging and Behavior,2008;2:49-58.
[21] deBellis, M. D., Hooper, S. R., Spratt, E. G., & Woolley, D. P. Neuropsychological findings in childhood neglect and their relationships to pediatric PTSD. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2009;15:868.
[22] DePrince, A., Weinzierl, K., & Combs, M. Executive function performance and trauma exposure in a community sample of children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2009;33:353-61.
[23] El-Hage, W., Gaillard, P., Isingrini, M., & Belzung, C. (2006). Trauma-related deficits in working memory. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry,2006;11:33-46.
[24] Watts-English, T., Fortson, B. L., Gibler, N., Hooper, S. R., & DeBellis, M. D. The psychobiology of maltreatment in childhood. Journal of Social Issues, 2006;62: 717-36.
[25] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV-R. American Psychiatric Press; 2000.
[26] Flor-Henry, P. Psychosis, neurosis, and epilepsy: Developmental and gender-related effects and their aetiological contribution. British Journal of Psychiatry,1974;124:144-50.
[27] Pontius, A. A., & Ruttiger, K. F. Frontal lobe system maturational lag in juvenile delinquents shown in narratives test. Adolescence, 1976;11:509-18.
[28] Cappadocia, M. C., Desrocher, M., Pepler, D., & Schroeder, J. H. Contextualizing the neurobiology of conduct disorder in an emotion dysregulation framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 2009;29:506-18.
[29] Frick, P. J. Conduct disorders and severe antisocial behaviour. New York:
[30] Frick, P. J., & Dickens, C. Current perspectives on conduct disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2006; 8:59-72.
[31] Christian, R. E., Frick, P. J., Hill, N. L., Tyler, L. & Frazer, D. R. Psychopathy and conduct problems in children: II. Implications for subtyping children with conduct problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1997; 36:233-41.
[32] Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. The Antisocial Process Screening Device. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems; 2001.
[33] Dadds, M. R., Fraser, J., Frost, A., & Hawes, D. J. Disentangling the underlying dimensions of psychopathy and conduct problems in childhood: A community study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2005; 73:400-10.
[34] Nadel, L. Multiple memory systems: A new view. In: R. Menzel & J. H. Byrne, editors, Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 1) (pp. 41-52). New York: Academic Press; 2008.
[35] Eichenbaum, H. Introduction and Overview. In H. Eichenbaum & J. H. Byrne, editors, learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 3) (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press; 2008.
[36] Squire, L. R. Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving, editors, Memory Systems 1994 (pp. 203-231). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994.
[37] Squire, L. R., & Shrager, Y. Declarative memory system: Amnesia. In H. Eichenbaum & J. H. Byrne, editors, Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 3) (pp. 67-78). New York: Academic Press; 2008.
[38] Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection: Memory Systems of the Brain. Oxford Psychology Series, no. 35. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
[39] Drummey, A. B., & Newcombe, N. S. Developmental changes in source memory. Developmental Science, 2002; 5:502-13.
[40] Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 1993;114: 3-28.
[41] Smeets, T., Jelicic, M., Merckelbach, H., Peters, M., Fett, A., Taverniers, J., Henquet, C. &, Dautzenberg, J. (2006). Enhanced memory performance on an internal–internal source monitoring test following acute psychosocial stress. Behavioral Neuroscience,2006;120:1204-10.
[42] Johnson, M. K. Discriminating the origin of information. InT. F. Oltmanns & B. A. Maher, editors, Delusional beliefs (pp. 34-65). New York: Wiley; 1988.
[43] Johnson, M. K. Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1988; 117:390-94.
[44] Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. Reality monitoring and suggestibility: Children's ability to discriminate among memories from different sources. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross, editors, and Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 92-121). New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987.
[45] Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K., & Kwon, P. Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1991; 52:297-318.
[46] Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994; 79:918-30.
[47] Gopnik, A., & Graf, P. (1988). Knowing how you know: Young children's ability to identify and remember the source of their beliefs. Child Development, 1988; 59:1366-71.
[48] Taylor, M., Esbensen, B.M., & Bennett, R.T. Children's understanding of knowledge acquisition: the tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learned. Child Development, 1994; 65:1581-1604.
[49] Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, G. J., & Perner, J. (1988). Children understand of informational access as a source of knowledge. Child Development, 1988; 59:386-96.
[50] Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison. Child Development, 1985; 56:1145-55.
[51] Foley, M. A., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech. Child Development, 1983; 54:51-60.
[52] Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. Wisconsin Card Sort Test, Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.
[53] Wechsler, D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd Ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1991.
[54] Boll, T. Children's category test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
[55] Sattler, J. M. Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Author; 1992.
[56] Williams, P. E., Weiss, L. G., & Rolfus, E. WISC-IV Technical report #1: Theoretical model and blueprint. Accessed June 5, 2004 from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/hai/Images/pdf/wisciv/WISCIVTechReport1.pdf
[57] Howe, N., & Recchia, H. E. Siblings and sibling rivalry. In M. M. Haith & J. B. Benson, editors, Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development vol. 3 (pp. 154-164). San Diego, CA: Academic; 2008.
[58] Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. Separate Lives: Why Siblings are so different. New York, NY: Basic; 1990.
[59] Clausen, J. M., Landsverk, J., Ganger, W., Chadwick, D., & Litrownik, A. Mental health problems of children in foster care. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1998;7:283-96.
[60] Achenbach, T. M. Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont; 1991.
[61] Healey, C. V., & Fisher, P. A. Young children in foster care and the development of favorable outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 2011; 33:1822-30.
[62] Bruce, J., Fisher, P. A., Pears, K. C., & Levine, S. Morning cortisol levels in preschool-aged foster children: Differential effects of maltreatment type. Developmental Psychobiology, 2009; 51:14-23.
[63] Fisher, P. A., Stoolmiller, M., Gunnar, M. R., & Burraston, B. O. Effects of a therapeutic intervention for foster preschoolers on diurnal cortisol activity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2007; 32:892-905.
[64] Brooks, D., & Barth, R. P. Characteristics and outcomes of drug-exposed and nondrug-exposed children in kinship care and non-relative foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 1998; 20:475-501.
[65] Fantuzzo, J., & Perlman, S. The unique impact of out-of-home placement and the mediating effects of child maltreatment and homelessness on early school success. Children and Youth Services Review, 2007; 29:941-60.
[66] Zima, B. T., Bussing, R., Freeman, S., Yang, X., Belin, T. R., & Forness, S. R. Behavior problems, academic skill delays and school failure among school-aged children in foster care: Their relationship to placement characteristics. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2000; 9:87-103.
[67] Duncan, R. D. Peer and sibling aggression: An investigation of intra- and extra-familial bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1999; 14:871-86.
[68] Dunn, J. Brothers and sisters in middle childhood and early adolescence: Continuity and change in individual differences. In G. H. Brody, editor,, Sibling relationships: Their causes and consequences (pp. 31-46). Norwood, NJ 7 Ablex; 1996.
[69] Linares, L. O. An understudied form of intra-family violence: Sibling-to-sibling aggression among foster children. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2006;11:95-109.
[70] Stocker, C. M., Burwell, R. A., & Briggs, M. L. Sibling conflict in middle childhood predicts children’s adjustment in early adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 2002; 16:50-7.
[71] Bellwood, P. Assessing siblings for family placement. Adoption and Fostering, 1985; 9:33-4.
[72] Aldridge, M. J., & Cautley, P. W. Placing siblings in same foster home. Child Welfare, 1976; 55:85- 93.
[73] Hegar, R. L. Sibling relationships and separations: Implications for child placement. Social Service Review, 1988; 62:446-67.
[74] Thorpe, M. B., & Swart, G. T. Risk and protective factors affecting children in foster care: A pilot study of the role of siblings. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1992; 37:616- 22.
[75] Boer, F., & Spiering, S. M. Siblings in foster care: Success and failure. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 1991; 21:291-300.
[76] Deater-Deckard, K., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. Dimensions and disorders of adolescent adjustment: A quantitative genetic analysis of unselected samples and selected extremes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1997; 38:515-25.
[77] Eaves, L. J., Silberg, J. L., Meyer, J. M., Maes, H. H., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., et al. Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 2. The main effects of genes and environment on behavioral problems in the Virginia twin study of adolescent behavioral development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1997; 38:965-80.
[78] Edelbrock, C., Rende, R., Plomin, R., & Thompson, L. A. A twin study of competence and problem behavior in childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1995; 36:775-85.
[79] Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Williams, B., Newcombe, R., Craig, I. W., et al. MAOA, maltreatment, and gene–environment interaction predicting children's mental health: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 2006; 11:903-13.
[80] Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., Horwood, L. J., Miller, A. L., & Kennedy, M. A. MAOA, abuse exposure and antisocial behaviour: 30-year longitudinal study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 2011; 198:457-63.
[81] Mead, H. K., Beauchaine, T. P., & Shannon, K. E. Neurobiological adaptations to violence across development. Development and Psychopathology, 2010; 22:1-22.
[82] Oades, R., Lasky-Su, J., Christiansen, H., Faraone, S., Sonuga-Barke, E., Banaschewski, T., et al. The influence of serotonin- and other genes on impulsive behavioral aggression and cognitive impulsivity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Findings from a family-based association test (FBAT) analysis. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2008;4(48): 48.
[83] DeBellis, M. D. Developmental traumatology: The psychobiological development of maltreated children and its implications for research, treatment, and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 2001;13:539-64.
[84] DeBellis, M. D., Baum, A. S., Birmaher, B., Keshavan, M. S., Eccard, C. H., Boring, A. M., Jenkins, F. J., et al. (1999). A.E. Bennett Research Award. Developmental traumatology Part I: Biological stress systems. Biological Psychiatry, 1999; 45:1259-70.
[85] Tremblay, R. E. Anger and aggression. In M. M. Haith & J. B. Benson, editors, Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development vol. 1 (pp. 62-74). San Diego, CA: Academic; 2008.
[86] Niwa, M., Jaaro-Peled, H., Tankou, S., Seshadri, S., Hikida, T., Matsumoto, Y., Cascella, N. G., Frick, P. J., Lahey, B. B., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Christ, M. A. G., & Hanson, K. Familial risk factors to oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Parental psychopathology and maternal parenting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992; 60:49-55.
[87] Barnow, S., Lucht, M., & Freyberger, H. Correlates of aggressive and delinquent conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 2005; 31:24-39.
[88] Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, J., & Lynskey, M. T. Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: II. Psychiatric outcomes of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1996; 34:1365-74.
[89] Frick, P. J., Lahey, B. B., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Christ, M. A. G., & Hanson, K. Familial risk factors to oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Parental psychopathology and maternal parenting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992; 60:49-55.
[90] Haapasalo, J., & Tremblay, R. E. Physically aggressive boys from ages 6 to 12: Family background, parenting behavior, and prediction of delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1994; 62:1044-52.
[91] Herrenkohl, T. I., Maguin, E., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. Developmental risk factors for youth violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2000; 26:176-86.
[92] Kroneman, L., Loeber, R., & Hipwell, A. E. Is neighborhood context differently related to externalizing problems and delinquency for girls compared with boys? Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2004; 7:109-122.
[93] Loeber, R., Green, S. M., Keenan, K., & Lahey, B. B. Which boys will fare worse? Early predictors of the onset of conduct disorder in a six-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1995;34:499-509.
[94] Luntz, B. K., & Widom, C. S. Antisocial personality disorder in abused and neglected children grown up. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1994; 151:670-74.
[95] Snyder, J., Schrepferman, L., Oeser, J., Patterson, G., Stoolmiller, M., Johnson, K., et al. Deviancy training and association with deviant peers in young children: Occurrence and contribution to early-onset conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 2005; 17:397-413.
[96] Wasserman, G. A., Miller, L. S., Pinner, E., & Jaramillo, B. Parenting predictors of early conduct problems in urban, high-risk boys. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1996; 35:1227-36.
[97] Miller-Johnson, S., Coie, J. D., Maumary-Gremaud, A., & Bierman, K. The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2002; 30:217-30.
[98] Morrell, J., & Murray, L. Parenting and the development of conduct disorder and hyperactive symptoms in childhood: A prospective longitudinal study from 2 months to 8 years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2003; 44: 489-508.
[99] Farrington, D. P. Childhood aggression and adult violence: Early precursors and later-life outcomes. In D.J. Pepler, K.H. Rubin, & Earlscourt Child and Family Centre, editors, The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 5-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1991.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    David M. Compton. (2013). The Consequences of Neglect in Children: Neurocognitive Comparisons Among Conduct Disordered and Non-Conduct Disordered Youth Residing in Foster-Care with That of Children from Intact Families. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    David M. Compton. The Consequences of Neglect in Children: Neurocognitive Comparisons Among Conduct Disordered and Non-Conduct Disordered Youth Residing in Foster-Care with That of Children from Intact Families. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2013, 2(3), 96-105. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    David M. Compton. The Consequences of Neglect in Children: Neurocognitive Comparisons Among Conduct Disordered and Non-Conduct Disordered Youth Residing in Foster-Care with That of Children from Intact Families. Psychol Behav Sci. 2013;2(3):96-105. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13,
      author = {David M. Compton},
      title = {The Consequences of Neglect in Children: Neurocognitive Comparisons Among Conduct Disordered and Non-Conduct Disordered Youth Residing in Foster-Care with That of Children from Intact Families},
      journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {96-105},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20130203.13},
      abstract = {Children (n = 85) between the ages of 6 and 16 were administered two tests of source monitoring proficiency, one an external source test and the second an internal source test. In addition, the children were assessed using the Children's Category Test (CCT), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The primary interest was to compare the source monitoring and cognitive processes of children in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder and children in foster care without a psychiatric diagnosis. In addition, a group consisting of children living with their parents was included for comparative purposes. For the primary analyses, the dependent variables consisted of raw ISM and ESM scores, full-scale IQ, measures of working memory and processing speed, and the total and perseverative error measures of the WCST. First, because age differences were expected, a MANOVA was used with the age of the subject grouped into three categories of 6 to 8-, 9 to 12-, and 13 to 16-year olds. Following the verification of age differences on the dependent measures, a MANCOVA was used to examine the influence of abuse/neglect by comparing individuals in foster care, with and without a psychiatric diagnosis. Therefore, the study comprised three groups: (1) a group of children living at home with the parents and serving as a comparison group, (2) a control group consisting of children living in foster care but with no psychiatric diagnosis, and (3) a group of children living in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder. Age, as a continuous variable, served as the covariate. ISM scores revealed that both of the control groups differed from the foster care / conduct disorder group, with scores in the foster care control group comparable to that of the intact family comparison group. The intact family comparison group had significantly higher FS-IQ scores than either foster care group. In addition, FS-IQ scores in the foster care control group were intermediate between that of the intact family comparison and conduct disorder groups. Children in the intact family comparison group made significantly fewer total errors and perseverative errors than either foster care group. However, the number of perseverative errors for the two foster care groups was comparable.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Consequences of Neglect in Children: Neurocognitive Comparisons Among Conduct Disordered and Non-Conduct Disordered Youth Residing in Foster-Care with That of Children from Intact Families
    AU  - David M. Compton
    Y1  - 2013/06/30
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13
    T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    SP  - 96
    EP  - 105
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7845
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.13
    AB  - Children (n = 85) between the ages of 6 and 16 were administered two tests of source monitoring proficiency, one an external source test and the second an internal source test. In addition, the children were assessed using the Children's Category Test (CCT), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The primary interest was to compare the source monitoring and cognitive processes of children in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder and children in foster care without a psychiatric diagnosis. In addition, a group consisting of children living with their parents was included for comparative purposes. For the primary analyses, the dependent variables consisted of raw ISM and ESM scores, full-scale IQ, measures of working memory and processing speed, and the total and perseverative error measures of the WCST. First, because age differences were expected, a MANOVA was used with the age of the subject grouped into three categories of 6 to 8-, 9 to 12-, and 13 to 16-year olds. Following the verification of age differences on the dependent measures, a MANCOVA was used to examine the influence of abuse/neglect by comparing individuals in foster care, with and without a psychiatric diagnosis. Therefore, the study comprised three groups: (1) a group of children living at home with the parents and serving as a comparison group, (2) a control group consisting of children living in foster care but with no psychiatric diagnosis, and (3) a group of children living in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder. Age, as a continuous variable, served as the covariate. ISM scores revealed that both of the control groups differed from the foster care / conduct disorder group, with scores in the foster care control group comparable to that of the intact family comparison group. The intact family comparison group had significantly higher FS-IQ scores than either foster care group. In addition, FS-IQ scores in the foster care control group were intermediate between that of the intact family comparison and conduct disorder groups. Children in the intact family comparison group made significantly fewer total errors and perseverative errors than either foster care group. However, the number of perseverative errors for the two foster care groups was comparable.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Dept. of Psychology, Palm Beach Atlantic University, West Palm Beach, FL, USA

  • Sections