Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

“Smoking Kills” vs. “Smoking Makes Restless”: Effectiveness of Different Warning Labels on Smoking Behavior

Received: 12 September 2013    Accepted:     Published: 20 October 2013
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Warning labels on cigarette packages rely on the negative health aspects of smoking. For smokers, however, smoking is related to positive as well as to negative outcomes. Positive smoking outcomes are shown to be crucial in activating smoking behaviour. Thus, this study compared current health warnings with warning labels contradicting positive outcomes. In a field study, 39 adult smokers were followed over a 5-day period to investigate the effect of the different types of warning labels on actual smoking behaviour. Our results provide evidence that smokers, who received warning labels contradicting positive outcome expectancies, smoked less than smokers, who received current health warnings. Thus, contradicting positive smoking outcomes on cigarette warning labels may be an effective tool in smoking prevention and intervention.

DOI 10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12
Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 5, October 2013)
Page(s) 181-187
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Smoking, Cigarette Health Warnings, Outcome Expectancies, Cessation

References
[1] T. B. Baker, T. H. Brandon, and L. Chassin, "Motivational influences on cigarette smoking", Annual Review of Psychology, vol.55, pp. 463–91, 2004
[2] A. Bandura, "Social learning theory", Prentice Hall: Englewood-Cliffs, NJ, 1977.
[3] H. Aarts and A. Dijksterhuis, "Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 78, pp. 53–63, 2000.
[4] J. A. Bargh and M. J. Ferguson, "Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes", Psychological Bulletin, vol. 126, pp.925–945, 2000.
[5] T. H. Brandon and T. V. Baker, "The smoking consequences questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students", Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 484–490, 1993.
[6] A. L. Copeland and T. H. Brandon, "Testing the causal role of expectancies in smoking motivation and behavior", Addictive Behaviors, vol. 25, pp. 445–449, 2000.
[7] A. Jaffe A and M. M. Kilbey, "The cocaine expectancy questionnaire (CEQ): Construction and predictive utility", Psychological Assessment, vol. 6, pp. 18–26, 1994
[8] B. C. Rather, M. S. Goldman, L. Roehrich L and M. Brannick, "Empirical modeling of an alcohol expectancy memory network using multidimensional scaling", Journal of Abnormal Psychology. vol. 101, pp. 174–183, 1992.
[9] J. A. Cranford, R. A. Zucker RA, J. Jester J, L. I. Puttler and H. E. Fitzgerald, "Parental alcohol involvement and adolescent alcohol expectancies predict alcohol involvement in male adolescents", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, vol. 24, pp.386–396, 2010.
[10] M. S. Goldman, S. A. Brown, B. A. Christiansen and G. T. Smith, "Alcoholism and memory: Broadening the scope of alcohol-expectancy research", Psychological Bulletin, vol. 110, pp. 127–146, 1991
[11] M. S. Goldman, S. A. Brown and B. A. Christiansen, "Expectancy theory: Thinking about drinking". In: H. T. Blane and K. E. Leonard, editors, "Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism" Guilford Press New York, pp. 181–226, 1987.
[12] A. W. Stacy AW, K. E. Widaman and G. A. Marlatt, "Expectancy models of alcohol use", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 58, pp. 918–928, 1990.
[13] C. Lau-Barraco and M. E. Dunn, "Evaluation of a single-session expectancy challenge intervention to reduce alcohol use among college students", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, vol. 22, pp. 168–175, 2008.
[14] M. E. Dunn, H. C. Lau and I. Y. Cruz, "Changes in activation of alcohol expectancies in memory in relation to changes in alcohol use after participation in an expectancy challenge program", Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 8,pp. 566–575, 2000.
[15] T. H. Brandon, L. M. Juliano LM and A. C. Copeland, "Expectancies for tobacco smoking". In: I. Kirsch, editor, "How expectancies shape experience", American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, pp. 263-299, 1999.
[16] P. S. Hendricks and T. H. Brandon TH, "Smoking expectancy associates among college smokers". Addictive Behaviors, vol. 30, pp. 235-245, 2005.
[17] R. Borland and D. Hill, "Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs", Tobacco Control, vol. 6, pp. 317–325, 1997.
[18] M. C. Willemsen, "The new EU cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: Results from the Dutch Continuous Survey of Smoking Habits". European Journal of Public Health, vol. 15, pp. 389–92, 2005.
[19] R. Borland, H.-H. Yong, N. Wilson, G. T. Fong, D. Hammond, K. M. Cummings, et al., "How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: Findings from the ITC Four-Country survey". Addiction, vol. 104, pp. 669–675, 2009.
[20] R. Borland, N. Wilson, G. T. Fong, D. Hammond, K. M. Cummings, H.-H. Yong, et al., "Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: Findings from four countries over five years", Tobacco Control, vol. 18, pp. 358–364. 2009
[21] D. Hammond, G. T. Fong, A. McNeill, R. Borland, and K. M. Cummings, "Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey", Tobacco Control, vol. 15, pp. 19–25, 2006.
[22] D. Hammond, P. W. McDonald, G. T. Fong, K. S. Brown, and R. Cameron, "The impact of cigarette warning labels and smoke-free bylaws on smoking cessation", Canadian Journal of Public Health, vol. 95, 201–204, 2004.
[23] M. O’Hegarty, L. L. Pederson, D. E. Nelson, P. Mowery, J. M. Gable and P. Wortley, "Reactions of young adult smokers to warning labels on cigarette packages", American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 30, pp. 467–473, 2006.
[24] E. J. Strahan, K. White, G. T. Fong, L. R. Fabrigar, M. P. Zanna, and R. Cameron, "Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective", Tobacco Control, vol. 11, pp. 183–190, 2002.
[25] D. Hammond D, G. T. Fong, P. W. McDonald, R. Cameron, and K. S. Brown, "Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behavior", Tobacco Control, vol. 12, pp. 391–395, 2003.
[26] G. Mahood, "Canada’s tobacco package label or warning system: Telling the truth about tobacco product risks", World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
[27] J. Whittingham, R. A. C. Ruiter, F. Zimbile F and G. Kok, "Experimental pretesting of public health campaigns: A case study", Journal of Health Communication, vol. 13, pp. 216–229, 2008.
[28] D. M. Erceg-Hurn, and L. G. Steed, "Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psychological reactance in smokers?", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 41, pp. 219–237, 2011.
[29] S. M. Ritter, B. C. N. Müller, S. Glock, R. B. van Baaren, R. C. M. E. Engels, and A. Dijksterhuis A, "Reformulating smoking-related warning statements into questions enhances the effectiveness of aAnti-smoking media campaigns". Manuscript submitted for publication, 2012.
[30] L.-E. Petersen, and F. Lieder, [On the effectivity of textual and graphical warning labels on cigarette packages]"Die Effektivität von schriftlichen und graphischen Warnhinweisen auf Zigarettenschachteln", Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, vol. 37, pp. 245–258, 2006.
[31] S. Glock, and J. Kneer, "Are deterrent pictures effective? The impact of warning labels on cognitive dissonance in smokers", Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, vol. 1, pp. 356–373, 2009.
[32] P. Süssenbach, S. Niemeier, and S. Glock, "Effects of and attention to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages", Psychology & Health, Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08870446.2013.799161, 2013.
[33] N. D. Weinstein, S. E. Marcus, and R. P. Moser, "Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk", Tobacco Control, vol. 14, pp. 55–59, 2005.
[34] A. Hahn, and B. Renner, "Perception of health risks: How smoker status affects defensive optimism", Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, vol. 11, pp. 93–112, 1998.
[35] C. McMaster, and C. Lee, "Cognitive dissonance in tobacco smokers", Addictive Behaviors, vol. 16, pp. 349–353, 1991.
[36] R. Schwarzer, "Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview", Psychology and Health, vol. 9, pp. 161–180, 1994.
[37] A. Good, and C. Abrahams, "Measuring defensive responses to threatening messages: A meta-analysis of measures", Health Psychology Review, vol. 1, pp. 208–229, 2007.
[38] G.-J.Y. Peters, R. A. C. Ruiter, and G. Kok, "Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory" Health Psychology Review, Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527, 2012.
[39] R. W. Rogers, "Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation", In: J. T. Cacioppo and R. E. Petty, editors "Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook", Guilford Press: New York NY, pp. 153–176, 1993
[40] S. T. Tiffany, "A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes", Psychological Review, vol. 97, pp. 147–168, 1990.
[41] Leigh BC, Stacy AW. Individual differences in memory associations involving the positive and negative outcomes of alcohol use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1998;12:39–46.
[42] C. K. Park, "Positive and negative consequences of alcohol consumption in college students", Addictive Behaviors, vol. 29, pp. 311–321, 2004.
[43] K. Fromme, E. A. Stroot, and D. Kaplan, "Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, vol. 5, pp. 19–26. 1993.
[44] K. P. Mayhew, B. R. Flay, and J. A. Mott, "Stages in development of adolescent smoking", Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 59, pp. 61–81, 2000.
[45] S. L. Kenford, S. S. Smith, D. W. Wetter, D. E. Jorenby, M. C. Fiore, and T. B. Baker, "Predicting relapse back to smoking: Contrasting affective and physical models of dependence". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 70, pp. 216–227, 2002
[46] A. Groppelli, D. M. Giorgi, S. Omboni, G. Parati, and G. Mancia, "Persistent blood pressure increase induced by heavy smoking", Journal of Hypertension, vol. 10, pp. 495–449, 1992.
[47] S. Glock, and S. Krolak-Schwerdt, "Changing outcome expectancies, drinking intentions, and implicit attitudes toward alcohol: A comparison of positive expectancy-related and health-related alcohol warning labels", Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2013.
[48] S. Glock, D. Unz, and C. Kovacs, "Beyond fear appeals: Contradicting positive smoking outcome expectancies to influence smokers’ implicit attitudes, perception, and behavior". Addictive Behaviors, vol. 37, pp. 548–551, 2012.
[49] G. Topa, and J.A. Moriano "Theory of planned behavior and smoking: Meta-analysis and SEM model", Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, vol. 1, pp. 23–33, 2010.
[50] B. Gawronski, and G.V. Bodenhausen, "Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change", Psychological Bulletin, vol. 132, pp. 692–731, 2006.
[51] J. De Houwer, R. Custers, and A. De Clercq, "Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking?", Cognition & Emotion, vol. 20, pp. 1274–1284, 2006.
[52] J. Huijding, P.J. de Jong, R.W. Wiers, and K. Verkooijen, "Implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking in a smoking and a nonsmoking setting", Addictive Behaviors, vol. 30 pp. 949–961, 2005.
[53] K. Witte, and M.A. Allen, "A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns", Health Education and Behavior, vol. 27, pp. 591–615, 2000.
[54] R. Schwarzer, "Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behaviors", Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 10, pp. 47–51, 2001.
[55] N.A. Rigotti, "Treatment of tobacco use and dependence", New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, pp. 506–512, 2002.
[56] R.W. Wiers, and P.J. de Jong, "Implicit and explicit alcohol, smoking and drug-related cognitions and emotions". In: J.Z. Arlsdale, editor "Advances in social psychology research". Nova Sciene Publishers: New York NY, pp. 1–35, 2006.
[57] Z. Harakeh, R.C.M.E. Engels, R.B. van Baaren, and R.H.J. Scholte, "Imitation of cigarette smoking: An experimental study on smoking in a naturalistic setting", Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 86, pp. 199–206, 2007.
[58] P.M. Fischer, D.M. Krugman, J.E. Fletcher, R.J. Fox, and T.H. Rojas, "An evaluation of health warnings in cigarette advertisements using standard market research methods: What does it mean to warn?", Tobacco Control, vol. 2, pp. 279–285, 1993.
[59] F. Pratto, and O.P. John, "Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 380–391, 1991.
[60] S. Glock, B.C.N. Müller, and S. Ritter, "Warning labels formulated as questions positively influence smoking-related risk perception", Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 252–262, 2013.
[61] N.A. Rigotti, J.E. Lee, and H. Wechsler, "US college students’ use of tobacco products: Results of a national survey", Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 284, pp. 699–705, 2000.
[62] V.N. Simmons, and T.H. Brandon TH, "Secondary smoking prevention in a university setting: A randomized comparison of an experiential, theory-based intervention and a standard didactic intervention for increasing cessation motivation", Health Psychology, vol. 26, pp. 268–277, 2007.
[63] J.L. Obermayer, W.T. Riley, O. Asif, and J. Jean-Mary, "College smoking-cessation using cell phone text messaging", Journal of American College Health, vol. 53, pp. 71–78, 2004.
[64] D.W. Wetter, S.K. Welsch, S.S. Smith, M.C. Fiore, S.L. Kenford, R.T. Fouladi, et al., "Prevalence and predictors of transitions in smoking behavior among college students", Health Psychology, vol. 23, pp. 168–177, 2004.
[65] R.A.C. Ruiter, and G. Kok, "Saying is not (always) doing: Cigarette warning labels are useless", European Journal of Public Health, vol. 15, pp. 329–330, 2005.
[66] A. Dijkstra, J. De Vries, and J. Roijackers, "Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation", Health Education research, vol. 13, pp. 207-214. 1998.
Author Information
  • LCMI Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

  • Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; epartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sabine Glock, Simone Maria Ritter, Rutger Engels, Ap Dijksterhuis, Rick Bart van Baaren, et al. (2013). “Smoking Kills” vs. “Smoking Makes Restless”: Effectiveness of Different Warning Labels on Smoking Behavior. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sabine Glock; Simone Maria Ritter; Rutger Engels; Ap Dijksterhuis; Rick Bart van Baaren, et al. “Smoking Kills” vs. “Smoking Makes Restless”: Effectiveness of Different Warning Labels on Smoking Behavior. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2013, 2(5), 181-187. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sabine Glock, Simone Maria Ritter, Rutger Engels, Ap Dijksterhuis, Rick Bart van Baaren, et al. “Smoking Kills” vs. “Smoking Makes Restless”: Effectiveness of Different Warning Labels on Smoking Behavior. Psychol Behav Sci. 2013;2(5):181-187. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12,
      author = {Sabine Glock and Simone Maria Ritter and Rutger Engels and Ap Dijksterhuis and Rick Bart van Baaren and Barbara Caterina Nadine Müller},
      title = {“Smoking Kills” vs. “Smoking Makes Restless”: Effectiveness of Different Warning Labels on Smoking Behavior},
      journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {181-187},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20130205.12},
      abstract = {Warning labels on cigarette packages rely on the negative health aspects of smoking. For smokers, however, smoking is related to positive as well as to negative outcomes. Positive smoking outcomes are shown to be crucial in activating smoking behaviour. Thus, this study compared current health warnings with warning labels contradicting positive outcomes. In a field study, 39 adult smokers were followed over a 5-day period to investigate the effect of the different types of warning labels on actual smoking behaviour. Our results provide evidence that smokers, who received warning labels contradicting positive outcome expectancies, smoked less than smokers, who received current health warnings. Thus, contradicting positive smoking outcomes on cigarette warning labels may be an effective tool in smoking prevention and intervention.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - “Smoking Kills” vs. “Smoking Makes Restless”: Effectiveness of Different Warning Labels on Smoking Behavior
    AU  - Sabine Glock
    AU  - Simone Maria Ritter
    AU  - Rutger Engels
    AU  - Ap Dijksterhuis
    AU  - Rick Bart van Baaren
    AU  - Barbara Caterina Nadine Müller
    Y1  - 2013/10/20
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12
    T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    SP  - 181
    EP  - 187
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7845
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130205.12
    AB  - Warning labels on cigarette packages rely on the negative health aspects of smoking. For smokers, however, smoking is related to positive as well as to negative outcomes. Positive smoking outcomes are shown to be crucial in activating smoking behaviour. Thus, this study compared current health warnings with warning labels contradicting positive outcomes. In a field study, 39 adult smokers were followed over a 5-day period to investigate the effect of the different types of warning labels on actual smoking behaviour. Our results provide evidence that smokers, who received warning labels contradicting positive outcome expectancies, smoked less than smokers, who received current health warnings. Thus, contradicting positive smoking outcomes on cigarette warning labels may be an effective tool in smoking prevention and intervention.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections