A Possible Framework for the Design of Learning Programs in Assistive Technology for People with Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Educational Environments
In an inclusive society, people with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) are socially connected and fully participate in all realms of life, including education and employment. In a digital society being able to use technology for learning and working is a condition for participation and not remaining behind. For that reason, efforts should be made to assure that all citizens have access to technology and are helped, if needed, to develop their digital skills. The objective of this paper is to provide a framework for designing learning programs addressed to people with ID. The aims of these programs would be to support the development of digital skills and enable the use of Assistive Technologies (AT) or the combination of Information Communication Technology and AT (ICT-AT). The framework provided is based on the European funded project “Keeping Pace with Assistive Technology (KPT)” that was adapted for the specific target group of people with ID.
Evert Jan Hoogerwerf,
A Possible Framework for the Design of Learning Programs in Assistive Technology for People with Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Educational Environments, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences.
Vol. 7, No. 2,
2018, pp. 29-37.
Gardiner, K., Herault, Y., Lott, I. T., Antonarakis, S. E., Reeves, R. H., & Dierssen, M. (2010). Down syndrome: from understanding the neurobiology to therapy. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(45), 14943-14945.
World Health Organization Executive Board. Resolution EB142. R6 (2018). Improving access to assistive technology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229-243.
Committee on Accreditation Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Education, RESNA-CAAHEP (2016). Standards and guidelines for the accreditation of educational programs in assistive technology [Internet]. Available at: http://www.caahep.org/CAAHEP/media/CAAHEP-Documents/AssistiveTechnologyStandards.pdf
Burgstahler, S. (2009). Universal Design of Instruction (UDI): Definition, Principles, Guidelines, and Examples. DO-IT.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1703 N. Beauregard St., Alexandria, VA 22311-1714.
UNESCO, (2011). ICT competency framework for teacher. Paris Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002134/213475e.pdf
Fullan, M. and Langworthy, M., (2014). A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education, (2013). Information and Communication Technology for Inclusion - Developments and Opportunities for European Countries. (A. Watkins, ed.). Odense, Denmark.
European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education, (2016). Raising the Achievement of All Learners in Inclusive Education - Literature Review. (A. Kefallinou, ed.). Odense, Denmark.
OECD, (2010). Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy: A Systematic Approach to Technology-Based School Innovations. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
High-frequency trading (HFT). Using personalised technology to enable transition – how personalised technology, including assistive technology and telecare, has enabled the transition from registered care to support living for individuals with learning disabilities. J Assist Technol 2010; 4:46–50.
UNESCO, (2004). Changing teaching practices using Curriculum Differentiation to Respond to Students Diversity.
Owuor, J., Larkan, F., & MacLachlan, M. (2017). Leaving no-one behind: using assistive technology to enhance community living for people with intellectual disability.
UN, (2006). Convention on the Rights of persons with Disability, G. A. Res. 61/106, Dec. 13, 2006. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/a61r106.htm
Bigby, C., & Ozanne, E. (2001). Shifts in the model of service delivery in intellectual disability in Victoria. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental disability, 26(2), 177-190.
Schalock, R. L., Buntinx, W. H. E., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Craig, E. M., Coulter, D. L., Yeager, M. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and system of supports (11e). Washington, D. C.: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, Virginia: American Psychiatric Publishing.
World Health Organisation. Definition: intellectual disability. 2017. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/mental-health/news/news/2010/15/childrens-right-to-family-life/definition-intellectual-disability
Sheehy, K. (2005). ICT and special educational needs: a tool for inclusion. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 206-207.
Standen, P. J., Brown, D. J., & Cromby, J. J. (2001). The effective use of virtual environments in the education and rehabilitation of students with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 289-299.
UNESCO, (2000). Section for Special Needs Education, Inclusive Education and Education for All. A challenge and a vision. Paris.
Salend, S. J. (2015). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective, differentiated and reflective practices. Pearson.
Ahmad, F. K. (2015). Use of assistive technology in inclusive education: Making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience, 6(2), 62-77.
Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & education, 114, 139-163.
Groff, J. (2013). Technology-rich innovative learning environments. OCED CERI Innovative Learning Environment project, 1-30.
Harris, J. (1999). Ways of seeing the recognition of prior learning (RPL): What contribution can such practices make to social inclusion? Studies in the Education of Adults, 31(2), 124-139.
Bowman, K., Clayton, B., Bateman, A., Knight, B., Thomson, P., Hargreaves, J., & Enders, M. (2003). Recognition of prior learning in the vocational education and training sector. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
Andersson, P., Fejes, A., & Sandberg, F. (2013). Introducing research on recognition of prior learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(4), 405-411.
Bateman, B. D., & Herr, C. M. (2011). Writing measurable IEP goals and objectives. Attainment Company Inc.
European Commission, (2005). Towards a European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning [Commission Staff Working Document] (SEC (2005) 57, July 2005), 4-11.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S., (2003). Understanding Student Learning. In: Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (eds.) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2nd Ed. (Routledge Falmer, London, 2003).
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.
Brookhart, S. & Lazarus, S. (2017). Formative Assessment for Students with Disabilities. Commissioned by the Council of Chief State School Officers State Collaboratives on Assessing Special Education Students and Formative Assessment, Washington, DC.
Owuor, J., Larkan, F., Kayabu, B., Fitzgerald, G., Sheaf, G., Dinsmore, J., & MacLachlan, M. (2018). Does assistive technology contribute to social inclusion for people with intellectual disability? A systematic review protocol. BMJ open, 8 (2), e017533.
Digital Agenda for Europe, (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social committee and the Committee of the Regions. (COM (2010) 245 final).
UNESCO IITE, (2012). Personalized Learning: A New ICT-Enabled Education Approach. IITE Policy Brief, March 2012. Moscow: UNESCO IITE. Available at: http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214716.pdf
European Commission, (2013). Opening up Education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new Technologies and Open Educational Resources/*COM/2013/0654 final*/. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-intent /EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0654
Roe, P. R. W., (2001). Bridging the Gap? Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne.
European Union, (2008). MeAC - Measuring Progress of eAccessibility in Europe: Assessment of the Status of eAccessibility in Europe. Main Report Empirica. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=1188
Federici, S., Scherer, M. J. (2017). Assistive technology assessment handbook. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
Raja, D. S. (2016). Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies. Background paper for the World Development Report.
MacLachlan, M., Banes, D., Bell, D., Borg, J., Donnelly, B., Fembek, M. & Hoogerwerf, E. J. (2018). Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-13.
DeMonte, J. (2013). High-Quality Professional Development for Teachers: Supporting Teacher Training to Improve Student Learning. Center for American Progress.
Smith, E. M., Gowran, R. J., Mannan, H., Donnelly, B., Alvarez, L., Bell, D. & Jan, Y. K. (2018). Enabling appropriate personnel skill-mix for progressive realization of equitable access to assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-9.
European Network for Technology Enhanced Learning in an Inclusive Society “ENTELIS”, (2015). Towards full digital inclusion: the Entelis Manifesto against the digital divide. Available at: http://www.entelis.net/sites/all/files/entelis_manifesto_en.pdf
Dudgeon, P., Scrine, C., Cox, A., & Walker, R. (2017). Facilitating empowerment and self-determination through participatory action research: Findings from the National Empowerment Project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917699515.