Cohabitation in Semi-Presidential Countries
Social Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages: 31-43
Received: Feb. 17, 2014; Published: Mar. 20, 2014
Views 2667      Downloads 221
Chun-Hao Chang, Department of Political Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan
Article Tools
Follow on us
This paper aims to discuss various forms of cohabitation in semi-presidentialism through the constitutional stipulations and intra-executive relationships between the president and the prime minister. By examining the cases of emerging semi-presidential countries, this paper suggests that “cohabitation” not be considered as the necessary outcome of a president-parliamentary divided government. The yielding or competing relations between the president and the prime minister may be variables that complicate semi-presidential types. Thus, concerning both the normative and practical aspects, this paper will analyze the intra- executive interaction in order to explore the executive-legislative stability within semi-presidentialism.
Semi-Presidentialism, Cohabitation, President, Prime Minister, Executive Power
To cite this article
Chun-Hao Chang, Cohabitation in Semi-Presidential Countries, Social Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 31-43. doi: 10.11648/
M. Duverger, (1980). "A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government," European Journal of Political Research, 8(2), pp. 165-187.
J.W. Lin, (2000). "Post-positivism and English School," Political Institution, Ed. Jih-Wen Lin. Taipei: Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Science and Philosophy Academia Sinica, pp. 137-175.
J.R. Shyu, (2000). "An Initial Study of the ‘Cohabitation’ Constitutional System: Comparing France with Taiwan," National Taiwan University Law Journal, 30(1), pp. 1-44.
R. Elgie, (1999). Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, New York: Oxford University Press.
R. Elgie, (2004). "Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations," Political Studies Review, 2(3), pp. 314-330.
R. Elgie, (2008a). "Semi-Presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice," Conference on Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy: Institutional Choice, Performance, and Evolution: Taipei, Taiwan, 17-18 October 2008, Taipei: Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica.
O. Protsyk, (2006). "Intra-Executive Competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation under Semi-presidentialism," Political Studies, 56(2), pp. 219-244.
R. Elgie, (2010). "Semi-presidentialism, Cohabitation and the Collapse of Electoral Democracies, 1990-2008," Government and Opposition, 45(1), pp. 29-49.
D. Leuffen, (2009). "Does Cohabitation Matter? French European Policy-Making in the Context of Divided Government," West European Politics, 32(6), pp. 1140-1160.
T. Sedelius, and J. Ekman, (2010). "Intra-executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effect of Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe," Government and Opposition, 45(4), pp. 505-530.
J. Raadt, (2009). "Contestable Constitutions: Ambiguity, Conflict, and Change in East Central European Dual Executive Systems," Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42(1), pp. 83-101.
C.H. Chang, (2011). "A Cross-national Study on the Operational Types of Semi-presidentialism," Issues and Studies, 50(2), pp. 107-142.
S. Roper, (2002). "Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier- Presidential Regimes," Comparative Politics, 34(3), pp. 253-272.
J. Gerring, S.C. Thacker and C. Moreno. (2009). "Are Parliamentary Systems Better?" Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), pp. 327-359.
J.W. Lin, (2009). "Can Cohabitation Become a Constitutional Convention under Semi-Presidentialism? A Comparison between France and Taiwan," Soochow Journal of Political Science, 27(1), pp. 1-51.
A. Stevens, (2003). Government and Politics of France, 3rd ed, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
C.H. Chang, (2010). "The Competition/Cooperation Relationship in Executive Power Operating of Semi-presidentialism," Conference on zhuan bian zhong de xing zheng yu li fa guan xi. Taipei, Taiwan, 13-14 May 2010. Taipei: Department of Political Science, Soochow University.
J. J. Linz, and A. C. Stepan, (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
R. Elgie, (2008b). "The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated?" Democratization, 15(1), pp. 49-66.
M. S. Shugart, and J. M. Carey, (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge U P
M. S. Shugart, (2005). "Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns," French Politics, 3(3), pp. 323-351.
O. V. Cranenburgh, (2008). "Big Man’ Rule: Presidential Power, Regime Type and Democracy in 30 African Countries," Democratization, 15(5), pp. 952-973.
R. Elgie, (2005). "A Fresh Look at Semipresidentialism: Variations on a Theme," Journal of Democracy, 16(3), pp. 98-112.
J. A. Cheibub, and S. Chernykh, (2009). "Are Semi-presidential Constitutions Bad for Democratic Performance?’ Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3), pp. 202-229.
A. Siaroff, (2003). "Comparative Presidencies: the Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidentialism and Parliamentary Distinction," European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), pp. 287-312.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC. (2011). Countries and Regions – Niger, Retrieved 12 March 2011 from
R. Elgie, (2007). "Varieties of Semi-Presidentialism and Their Impact on Nascent Democracies," Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 3(2), pp. 53-71.
J.H. Tsai, (2008). "Sub-types of Semi-presidentialism and Political Deadlock," French Politics, 6(1), pp. 63-84.
Y.C. Shen, (2009). wei ma xian zheng bian zou qu. Taipei: Wu Nan.
Y.C. Shen, (2006). "The Constitution of the Weimar Republic: A Case Study of Semi-presidentialism," Soochow Journal of Political Science, 24, pp. 163-212.
Y.C. Shen, (2004). "Power Fragmentation and Government Stability under Semi-Presidentialism: A Comparative Study of Taiwan and the Weimar Republic," Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 1(3), pp. 99-129.
S.E. Tănăsescu, (2008). "The President of Romania, or the Slippery Slope of a Political System," European Constitutional Law Review, 4, pp. 64-97.
T. Gallagher, and V. Andrievici, (2008). "Romania: Political Irresponsibility Without Constitutional Safeguards," Semi-presidentialism and Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe, Ed. Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup, UK: Manchester UP, pp. 138-158.
P. Schleiter, and E. Morgan-Jones, (2009). "Party Government in Europe? Parliamentary and Semi-presidential Democracies Compared," European Journal of Political Research, 48(5), pp. 665-693.
Wikipedia, (2011). "List of Presidents of Bulgaria," Retrieved 12 March 2011 from
Y.H. Lin, (2000). "The Study of Economic Reform in Bulgaria During Post-Communist Era," Master’s Thesis, Tamkang U.
M.H. Hung, (1999). "The Bulgaria's Political and Economical Development in the Post-Communist Era," Americas & Europe Quarterly, 13(2), pp. 181-204.
M. Tavits, (2009). "Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests," Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), pp. 42-54.
A. O. Neto, and M. Costa Lobo, (2009). "Portugal’s Semi-presidentialism (Re)considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976–2006," European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), pp. 234-255.
K. Matsuzato, (2005). "Semi-presidentialism in Ukraine: Institutionalist Centrism in Rampant Clan Politics," Demokratizatsiya, 13(1), pp. 45-58.
H.M. Chen, and Y.D. Liang, (2007). "The Formation and Evolution of Semi-Presidentialism: A Comparative Study of Taiwan, France, Poland and Finland," Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 4(4), pp. 27-69.
Y.S. Wu, (2002). "Cabinet Formation and Political Stability under Semi-Presidentialism: Comparing Russia, Poland and the ROC," Journal of Russian Studies, 2, pp. 229-265.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186