The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 provided rights for land-locked states on the sea. More importantly, the convention provided them with the right of access to and from the seas and freedom of transit. However, the law makes such rights subject to the agreements to be made by land-locked and transit states. This, in turn, depends on the prevailing relations between the concerned states. If they are not in a smooth relation, the transit states may not be willing to negotiate and thereby put impediments on the land-locked states’ free transit. The political will and commitment of transit states highly conditioned the rights of land-locked states. The denial of free transit, in turn, affects the rights of land-locked states on the different maritime regimes. Land-locked states have no absolute right of access to and from the seas and freedom of transit. Hence, the study concludes that to give practical effect to those rights, negotiating bilateral and multilateral agreements with the transit states has a crucial and irreplaceable role.
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12 |
| Page(s) | 27-30 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Land-Locked States, Transit States, Coastal States, Convention, Agreement, Seas
| [1] | Diba, Bahman Aghai (2014), “Iran and Landlocked States”, [Online] Available at: http://www.payvand.com/news/14/dec/1111.html |
| [2] | Faye, Michael L., Mcarthur, John W., Sachs, Jeffrey D. and Snow, Thomas (2004) “The Challenges Facing Landlocked Developing Countries”, Journal of Human Development, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 31-68 |
| [3] | Gevorgyan, Anna S (2011) “The Transit Regime for Landlocked States: International Law and Development Perspectives”, A Master’s Essay, American University of Armenia, Armenia |
| [4] | Government of Mongolia (2007) “Trade, Trade Facilitation and Transit Transport Issues for Landlocked Developing Countries Executive Summary”, Available at: http://unohrlls.org/UserFiles/File/LLDC%20Documents/MTR/Executive%20summary.pdf |
| [5] | Malanczuk, Peter (1997) Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, Seventh edition, New York: Routledge |
| [6] | Rana, Ramesh Kumar (2010) “Right of access of land-locked state to the sea bythe example of bilateral agreement between land-locked state- Nepal and portstate – India”, Master’s Thesis, University of Tromsø |
| [7] | Shaw, Malcolm N. (2008) International Law, Sixth edition, New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| [8] | Snow, Thomas, Faye, Michael, McArthur, John and Sachs, Jeffrey (2003) “Country case studies on the challenges facing landlocked developing countries”, OCCASIONAL PAPER, Background paper for HDR 2003 |
| [9] | UN (1982) “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982”, Available at: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf |
| [10] | (2007) “Regional cooperation in transit transport: Solutions for landlocked and transit developing countries”, Trade and Development Board Commission on Enterprise, Business Facilitation and Development Expert meeting on regional cooperation in transit transport: Solutions for landlocked and transit developing countries, Geneva, 27–28 September 2007 |
| [11] | Uprety, Kishor (2003) “From Barcelona to Montego Bay and Thereafter: A Search for Landlocked States’ Rights to Trade through Access to the Sea –A Retrospective Review” Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, (2003) 7. Pp. 201–235 |
APA Style
Endalcachew Bayeh. (2015). The Rights of Land-Locked States Under the International Law: The Role of Bilateral/Multilateral Agreements. Social Sciences, 4(2), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12
ACS Style
Endalcachew Bayeh. The Rights of Land-Locked States Under the International Law: The Role of Bilateral/Multilateral Agreements. Soc. Sci. 2015, 4(2), 27-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12
AMA Style
Endalcachew Bayeh. The Rights of Land-Locked States Under the International Law: The Role of Bilateral/Multilateral Agreements. Soc Sci. 2015;4(2):27-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12,
author = {Endalcachew Bayeh},
title = {The Rights of Land-Locked States Under the International Law: The Role of Bilateral/Multilateral Agreements},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
pages = {27-30},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20150402.12},
abstract = {The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 provided rights for land-locked states on the sea. More importantly, the convention provided them with the right of access to and from the seas and freedom of transit. However, the law makes such rights subject to the agreements to be made by land-locked and transit states. This, in turn, depends on the prevailing relations between the concerned states. If they are not in a smooth relation, the transit states may not be willing to negotiate and thereby put impediments on the land-locked states’ free transit. The political will and commitment of transit states highly conditioned the rights of land-locked states. The denial of free transit, in turn, affects the rights of land-locked states on the different maritime regimes. Land-locked states have no absolute right of access to and from the seas and freedom of transit. Hence, the study concludes that to give practical effect to those rights, negotiating bilateral and multilateral agreements with the transit states has a crucial and irreplaceable role.},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Rights of Land-Locked States Under the International Law: The Role of Bilateral/Multilateral Agreements AU - Endalcachew Bayeh Y1 - 2015/03/19 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 27 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150402.12 AB - The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 provided rights for land-locked states on the sea. More importantly, the convention provided them with the right of access to and from the seas and freedom of transit. However, the law makes such rights subject to the agreements to be made by land-locked and transit states. This, in turn, depends on the prevailing relations between the concerned states. If they are not in a smooth relation, the transit states may not be willing to negotiate and thereby put impediments on the land-locked states’ free transit. The political will and commitment of transit states highly conditioned the rights of land-locked states. The denial of free transit, in turn, affects the rights of land-locked states on the different maritime regimes. Land-locked states have no absolute right of access to and from the seas and freedom of transit. Hence, the study concludes that to give practical effect to those rights, negotiating bilateral and multilateral agreements with the transit states has a crucial and irreplaceable role. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: