Research on the Mechanism and Evolving Path of Community Empowerment in Cultural Heritage Sites
Social Sciences
Volume 7, Issue 6, December 2018, Pages: 312-320
Received: Sep. 28, 2018; Accepted: Nov. 9, 2018; Published: Dec. 28, 2018
Views 325      Downloads 31
Authors
Jian Gong, College of Urban & Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China; China Tourism Academy, Wuhan Branch, Wuhan, China
Jia Li, College of Urban & Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China; China Tourism Academy, Wuhan Branch, Wuhan, China
Alisa Shapovalova, College of Urban & Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China; China Tourism Academy, Wuhan Branch, Wuhan, China
David Knight, College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Under government-led tourism development model, the traditional cultural communities have problems of inadequate and uneven development of tourism empowerment. Based on the theories of four-type power and the core-periphery tourism destination theory six tourism communities of a mature cultural tourist destination - Wudang Mountain - were investigated to explore the development status of empowerment problems. To explore the mechanism and evolution path of community tourism empowerment in mature cultural heritage sites as well as figure out the roles played by local government, tourism enterprises, local elites and tourists. This paper proposes an improvement strategy for the empowerment promotion of cultural heritage sites. Research indicates that: (1) In terms of community disempowerment dimension, the government is the highlight stakeholder of influence and the local elite is the second remarkable stakeholder of it. (2) Regarding the passive community empowerment, government is the most remarkable stakeholder. (3) In terms of community self-empowerment and psychological dimension, there is a significant difference in community location; the empowerment development in peripheral areas is more significant than in core and transition areas. (4) In the aspect of the residents' overall tourism satisfaction, the transition area has the lowest satisfaction level and the highest level of tourism-support. The core and peripheral areas show opposite results. (5) Among four dimensions of community tourism empowerment, the passive empowerment has the most significant impact on the residents. The conclusion of the study is that the development path of empowerment in China's cultural heritage sites should be based on the government-led background, focusing on the community’s development of self-enhancement, differentiation of community space and groups as well as proposing targeted enhancement strategies based on their own character.
Keywords
Cultural Heritage Site, Tourism Empowerment, Mechanism and Path
To cite this article
Jian Gong, Jia Li, Alisa Shapovalova, David Knight, Research on the Mechanism and Evolving Path of Community Empowerment in Cultural Heritage Sites, Social Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 6, 2018, pp. 312-320. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20180706.21
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
DENG Wei, FANG Yiping, TANG Wei. The strategic effect and general directions of urbanization in mountain areas of China [J]. Bulletin of Chinese academy of sciences, 2013, 28(1): 66-72.
[2]
World Tourism Organization. Agenda 21 for the travel and tourism industry [R]. 1997.
[3]
LI Jia, ZHONG Linsheng, CHENG Shengkui. Research progress on poverty elimination by tourism in China [J]. China population resources and environment, 2009, (3): 156-162.
[4]
GEORGE H. Definition of community areas of agreement [J]. Rural sociology, 1955, 20(2): 111-123.
[5]
SUN Shiliang, MA Bo. Research of the basic issues concerning tourism communities [J]. Tourism science, 2007, 21(2): 29-32.
[6]
WANG Chunyang, HUANG Fucai. An empirical study on the definition and classification of stakeholders in village heritage sites: a case study of Kaiping watchtower and village [J]. Tourism tribune, 2012, 27(08): 88-94.
[7]
BAO Jigang, SUN Jiuxia. A contrastive study on the difference in community participation in tourism between China ang the West [J]. Acta geographica sinica, 2006(04): 401-413.
[8]
FAN Youmeng, XIE Yanjun, WANG Zhiwen. The role of power in decision making by tourist destinations: a critical discourse analysis of News on Shangjiushan village, China [J]. Tourism tribune, 2016, 31(01): 22-36.
[9]
SOLOMON B. Black empowerment: social work in oppressed communities [M]. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976: 135-139.
[10]
AKAMA J. Western environmental values and nature-based tourism in Kenya [J]. Tourism management, 1996, 17(8): 567-574.
[11]
SCHEYVENS R. Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities [J]. Tourism management, 1999, 20: 245-249.
[12]
VENEKLASEN L, MILLER V. A new weave of power, people and politics: the action guide for advocacy and citizen participation [M]. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 2007: 38-56.
[13]
TROMMLEROVA K, KLASEN S, LEBMANN J, et al. Determinants of empowerment in a capability-based poverty approach: evidence from the Gambia [J]. World development, 2015, 66: 1–15.
[14]
KNIGHT D, COTTRELL S. Evaluating tourism-linked empowerment in Cuzco, Peru [J]. Annals of tourism research, 2016, 56: 32–47.
[15]
ROWLAND J. Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras [M]. Oxford: Oxfam GB, 1997: 108-116.
[16]
IBRAHIM S, ALKIRE S. Agency and empowerment: a proposal for internationally comparable indicators [J]. Oxford development studies, 2007, 35(4): 379-403.
[17]
Wudang Mountain Tourism official portal. Wudang Mountain historical status [N/OL]. Wudang Mountain Special Zone: Wudang Mountain Tourism Special Economic Zone Management Committee, 2017-02-07[2018-01-15].http://ly.wudangshan.gov.cn/wdgs/201702/t20170207_999909.shtml.
[18]
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. World Heritage List [R/OL]. New York: UNESCO, 2017-12-31 [2018-01-14]. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/.
[19]
Wudang Mountain Special Administrative Region. Wudang Mountain Special Zone 2016 comprehensive target assessment of the situation briefing [R]. 2017.
[20]
BAO Jigang, LIN Minhui. Study on control of tourism commercialization in historic town and village [J]. Acta geographica sinica, 2014, 69(02): 268-277.
[21]
ZUO Bing, BAO Jigang. From community participation to community empowerment——review on theoretical study of “tourism empowerment” in western countries [J]. Tourism tribune, 2008, 23(4): 58-63.
[22]
BAO Jigang, SUN Jiuxia. Community participation in tourism of Yubeng Village means of participation and its significance for empowerment [J]. Tourism forum, 2008, 1(1): 58-65.
[23]
SUN Jiuxia. Empowerment theory and the construction of community capability in the development of tourism [J]. Tourism tribune, 2008, 23(9): 22-27.
[24]
GUO Wen. Study on the “alternate system mode” regarding rural residents’ participation in tourism development and community empowerment effectiveness [J]. Tourism tribune, 2010, 25(3): 76-83.
[25]
CHEN Zhiyong, LI Lejing, LI Tianyi. The organizational evolution, systematic construction and empowerment significance of Langde Miao’s community tourism [J]. Tourism tribune, 2013, 28(6): 75-86.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186