Confucius and Chinese Philosophical Impact on Modern Korea and Japan
Social Sciences
Volume 8, Issue 6, December 2019, Pages: 299-302
Received: May 10, 2019; Accepted: Jun. 13, 2019; Published: Oct. 26, 2019
Views 22      Downloads 7
Muhammad Wazir, Department of Marxism, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
Wang Lei, Department of Marxism, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
The purpose of this conceptual paper is to understand the role of Confucianism Chinese philosophy in influencing modern Korea and Japan. This paper found that Confucianism had a significant impact on current modern world. However, it has been a selective application. Confucianism still has vital value within the modern times; this paper examined to expound the modern significance of Confucianism, In particular, it is clear that Confucianism has had profound influence on world politics and foreign policy. The major focus was on the impact of Confucianism on modern world politics and foreign policy. In the field of international relations and foreign policy analysis, it is well known that ideas are always critical to any changes of a country’s foreign policy. The author examined the influence of Confucianism Chinese philosophy on Chinese domestic politics and modern politics. The analysis covered recent arguments about the role of Confucianism from several leading contemporary thinkers. Korea and Japan spent much time culturally and politically under the influence of China, Which brought Confucianism to these countries? Korean, as well as Japanese communication is heavily influenced by Confucian traditional values. It is demonstrated that those values are changing. But they seem to be better preserved in Korean society based upon the educational system of teaching moral values, nationalism, and arrested Cultural Revolution.
Confucianism, Values, Chinese Philosophy, Human Civilization, Modern World, Korea and Japan
To cite this article
Muhammad Wazir, Wang Lei, Confucius and Chinese Philosophical Impact on Modern Korea and Japan, Social Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 299-302. doi: 10.11648/
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Chan, Wing-tsit. A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1963). Confucianism in China Today, Pearson Living Religions Forum New York April 14, 2011 Joseph A. Adler Kenyon College.
The Relevance of Confucian Philosophy to Modern Concepts of Leadership and Followership Sujeeta Dhakhwa University of North Florida Stacey Enriquez University of North Florida the Osprey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry.
Hsu, L. The Political Philosophy of Confucianism (London: Curzon Press, 1975).
Ramirez, Luis F. and Rubio, Julio E. "Culture, Government and Development in South Korea." Asian Culture and History 2. 1 (2010): 71-81. Web.
Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chen, L. F. (1986). The Confucian way: A new and systematic study of the four books', (S.-S. Liu. Trans.). London: Rutledge.
John M. Koller, Oriental Philosophies, London: MacMillan, 1985, p. 252.
Chen Hongxing. Reproduction, Familiarity, Love and Humaneness: How Confucius Revealed.
Humaneness», Frontiers of Philosophy in China, December 2010, Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 507.
The Modern Significance of Confucianism Yuanxia Zhou Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100102, China.
1996a. “Rujiasixiangyuxiandairensheng” [Confucianismand Modern Life], in Yu 1996, 171–179.
1988. “Xiandai Ruxue de kunjing” [The Predicament of Modern Confucianism], first published in Zhongguoshibao, “Renjianfukan” (29. 08. 1998), also in Yu 1992, 95–102, and in Yu 1996, 159–164.
Kang, Jae-eun and Lee, Suzanne. The Land of Scholars: Two Thousand Years of Korean Confucianism (Paramus, New Jersey: Homa&Sekey, 2003).
Ken Tamai, Jonghwan Lee, Confucianism as Cultural Constraint: A Comparison of Confucian Values of Japanese and Korean University Students., International Education Journal, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2002, p. 35.
Daniel A. Bell, Hahm Chaibong, Confucianism for the Modern World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 34. 42.
Wieslaw Kotañski, W krêgushintoizmu [In the circle of Shinto], Warszawa: Wyd. Dialog, 1995, p. 73. 85. Robert Bellah, Tokugawa Religion: The Cultural Roots of Modern Japan, New York The Free.
Press, 1985, p. 23. 30; Martin Collcutt, The Confucian Legacy in Japan., in The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, Gilbert Rozman (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
Kato Shuishi, Réevaluation du Confucianisme, Cahiers d. Extrême-Asie, Vol. 6, 1991, p. 211. Ken Tamai, Jonghwan Lee, J., Confucianism as Cultural Constraint.
A Comparison of Confucian Values of Japanese and Korean University Students. International Education Journal, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2002, p. 33. 49. Arranged marriages are serve to maintain group harmony. Olga Barbasiewicz.
Rediscovering Confucianism, a Major Philosophy of Life in East Asia, Folkestone: Global Oriental Media, 2006, p. 98.
The Japanese Family System from the Meiji Restoration until the 21st Century, Acta.
Asiatica Varsoviensia, No. 22, 2009, p. 8. Lodén, Rediscovering Confucianism, p. 143.
Tu Wei Ming, Confucian Traditions. p. 208.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186