Complexity and Transformation of Education: The Transition from the Local to the Global
Social Sciences
Volume 9, Issue 5, October 2020, Pages: 146-154
Received: Jul. 29, 2020; Accepted: Aug. 24, 2020; Published: Sep. 8, 2020
Views 32      Downloads 20
Olga Cecilia Basora Gomez, General Direction of Quality Management, Autonomous University of Santo Domingo (UASD), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Article Tools
Follow on us
The relationship between the social, economic, and political systems with the educational system has always existed, but the observation of this correspondence through the gaze of complexity has only been carried out since recent times. Upon delving into it, an ever-growing dynamism is observed in that interdependence. To the extent that the development of the educational system is observed throughout history, the presence of the social, political, and economic system in it is more evident and vice versa. The complexity allows us to observe how the characteristic features of a long, centuries-long first stage, spurred on by the environment, are transformed into others and how they support the system that supports them. It is also observed how the traits belonging to the second stage are useless in these historical moments of social transformation, which is why a new transformation in education is taking place. What are the actions of the environment that can force an educational transformation to take place? What are those traits that characterize today's education? Where is education headed? Surprisingly, the center-periphery relationship emerges as the protagonist in the investigation of the relationship between these systems. This research tries not only to show the existence of this relationship but also the need to delve into it to glimpse the new trends in educational transformation.
Education, Complexity, Periphery, Global, Local, System
To cite this article
Olga Cecilia Basora Gomez, Complexity and Transformation of Education: The Transition from the Local to the Global, Social Sciences. Special Issue: Contributions to the Scientific Study of Complex-System Dynamics. Vol. 9, No. 5, 2020, pp. 146-154. doi: 10.11648/
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Aguerrondo, I. (1999). The New Paradigm of Education for the century. Retrieved on April 20, 2020, from OEI for Science and Culture. Reading Room:
Basora, O. (2017). Transdisciplinary Group of Complex Thought and Complexity Sciences (RD Complexity). Retrieved on June 20, 2020, from Morphogenesis and morphostasis of the educational system:
Bauman, Z. (2010). Time is short. Conversations with Citlali Rovirosa-Madrazo. Arcadia Editions. Barcelona.
Brower, J. (2010). Epistemological foundations for the outline of a complex pedagogy. Retrieved on April 2, 2020, from Polis. Latin American Magazine:
Carrillo, M., Delgado, J., López, M., González, M., Grinszpun, R., Quiroga, S., Marcos, V. (2020). Dystopian Consciousness and Society. Seville: Adaliz Ediciones.
Colodro, M. (2002). Reflections on the chaos. Santiago de Chile: University Editorial.
Damasio, A. (1996). Descartes's mistake. The reason for the emotion. Santiago de Chile: Andrés Bello.
Delors, J., et al. (1994). The education holds a treasure. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the 21st Century. Paris: UNESCO.
Gell-Mann, M. (1994). Complex adaptive systems. Complexity: Metaphors, Models and Reality, 17-45.
Gell-mann, M. (2003). The quark and the jaguar. Barcelona: Tusket editores.
Henao-Villa, C. F., García-Arango, D. A., Aguirre-Mesa, E. D., Henao, C; González, A.; Bracho, R.; Solorzano, J.; Arboleda, A.. (2017). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in training for engineering research. Lasallian Research Magazine, 179-197.
Leff, E. (2004). Environmental knowledge, sustainability, rationality, complexity and power (fourth ed.). Mexico: XXI century.
Sousa, M. (1993). Towards a group didactic. Buenos Aires: Miño and Dávila.
Maldonado, C. and Gómez, N. (2011). The World of Complexity Sciences. Rosario University. Recovered from:
Maturana, H. (1992). Emotions and language in education and politics. Development Education Center (CEO) (fifth ed.). Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Pedagógicas Chilenas S. A.
Morín, E. (1995). Introduction to complex thinking. Barcelona: Gedisa, S. A.
Morín, E. (2001): The seven knowledges necessary for the education of the future. Barcelona, Gedisa, Barcelona.
Nicolescu, B. (1990). Transdisciplinarity Manifesto. Du Rocher editions. Retrieved on October 20, 2017, from
Nicolescu, B.; Morin, E. (1994). De fritas Lima, Letter of transdisciplinarity. Portugal: Convent of Arrábida.
Núñez, J. (2003). Science and technology as social processes: what science education should not forget. Havana: Félix Varela.
Souto, M. (1997). Souto, M. (1998). The school class, "A Look from the didactics of the group." In the book by various authors. In A. e. Camiloni, Contemporary teaching currents (pp. 119-139). Buenos Aires: Paidos.
Tobón, S. (2006). Competences in higher education. Quality policies. Bogotá: ECOE Ediciones.
Tunnerman, C. (2003). The Latin American university facing the challenges of the XXI century. Mexico: Union of Universities of Latin America.
Vallaeys, F. (2010). Development learning community. Interculturality. Creation of a concept and development of an attitude. Peru. Retrieved on March 8, 2020, from http: // related: Fileticket = ckiklueaqym
Vessuri, H. (2006). University and scientific research. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186