Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research

Wellington Amâncio da silva; Elilia Camargo Rodrigues

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research

Wellington Amâncio da silva, Elilia Camargo Rodrigues

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 2)

Received: 31 March 2014 Accepted: 16 April 2014 Published: 30 April 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This article discusses the relevance of qualitative and participatory methodologies in education, bearing in mind the principles etnopedagógicos in the construction of social research in the educational field. In circumstances of investigation the interactivity and participation are mediators in that process because it contributes to the identification and representation of subjectivation of the subjects researchers in insertions and engagement with the object of research. The identity is discussed as action and interaction of actors and IBM research. These theoretical, methodological components pertinent to symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, prioritize the subjectivity, the interaction and participation of the subjects in the polls from a micro vision to reach a understanding macro, proposed by etnométodos within the social research in contemporary times. Bibliographic search result, intends to consider the contemporary speech driven breaking traditional paradigms that force the neutrality as added value to the production of knowledge.

Published in	Social Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
Page(s)	53-58
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Ethnomethodology, Symbolic Interactionism, Interaction, Social Research, Research Methodology, Everydayness, Intersubjectivity

References

[1]	ASTI VERA, A. Metodologia da pesquisa científica. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Globo, 1979.
[2]	BERGER, P. L.; LUCKAMN, T. A construção social da realidade. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1985.
[3]	BOURDIEU, P.O poder simbólico. Tradução Fernando Tomaz. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2001.
[4]	CARDOSO, R.Aventuras de antropólogos em campo ou como escapar das armadilhas do método. In: ______ (Org.). A aventura antropológica: teoria e pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1986.
[5]	COULON, A.Etnometodologia e educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1995.
[6]	COULON, A.La etnometodologia. Madrid: Catedra, 1988.
[7]	DELGADO, Lucília A. N.História oral, memória, tempo e identidade. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2006.
[8]	FOUCAULT, M.Microfisica do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal, 1979.
[9]	GARFINKEL, Harold. Studies of Etnomethodology Social. 2ª ed. UK, Politicy Press: 1967.
[10]	GEERTZ, C.A interpretação das culturas. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1989.
[11]	GOFFMAN, E. A representação do eu na vida cotidiana. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1983.
[12]	HAGUETTE, M.T.Metodologias qualitativas na sociologia. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2005.
[13]	HALL, S. A identidade cultural na pós-modernidade. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 1999.
[14]	LAPASSADE, G. As microssociologias. Tradução de LucieDidio. Brasília, DF: Líber Livro, 2005.
[15]	Grupos organizações e instituições. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco. Alves, 1983.
[16]	LEVY-STRAUSS, C. Antropologia estrutural. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1985.
[17]	MAFFESOLI, M. O tempo das tribos: o declínio do individualismo nas sociedades de massa. Tradução Maria de Lourdes Menezes. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2006.
[18]	MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. Argonautas do pacífico ocidental: um relato do empreendimento e da aventura dos nativos nos arquipélagos da Nova Guiné Melanésia. 2. ed. São Paulo: Abril, 1978.
[19]	MINAYO, M.C. O desafio do conhecimento. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Hucitec-Abrasco, 1993.
[20]	SCHUTZ, Alfred. On Multiple Realities.International Phenomenological Society. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 5, No. 4 (Jun., 1945), pp. 533-576.
[21]	Sobre Fenomenologia e Relações Sociais. Ed. Vozes, Petrópolis: 2012.
[22]	SOUZA, E. C. de; SOUSA, C. P. de; CATANI, D. B.A pesquisa (auto)biográfica e a invenção de si no Brasil. Revista da FAEEBA – Educação e Contemporaneidade, Salvador, v. 17, n. 29, p. 31-42, jan. 2008.
[23]	TEIXEIRA, E. C. O local e o global: limites e desafios da participação cidadã. São Paulo: Cortez, 2001.
[24]	VELHO, G. Individualismo e cultura: notas para uma antropologia da sociedade contemporânea. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar, 1981.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wellington Amâncio da silva, Elilia Camargo Rodrigues. (2014). Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research. Social Sciences, 3(2), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wellington Amâncio da silva; Elilia Camargo Rodrigues. Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(2), 53-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wellington Amâncio da silva, Elilia Camargo Rodrigues. Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research. Soc Sci. 2014;3(2):53-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13,
  author = {Wellington Amâncio da silva and Elilia Camargo Rodrigues},
  title = {Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {53-58},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20140302.13},
  abstract = {This article discusses the relevance of qualitative and participatory methodologies in education, bearing in mind the principles etnopedagógicos in the construction of social research in the educational field. In circumstances of investigation the interactivity and participation are mediators in that process because it contributes to the identification and representation of subjectivation of the subjects researchers in insertions and engagement with the object of research. The identity is discussed as action and interaction of actors and IBM research. These theoretical, methodological components pertinent to symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, prioritize the subjectivity, the interaction and participation of the subjects in the polls from a micro vision to reach a understanding macro, proposed by etnométodos within the social research in contemporary times. Bibliographic search result, intends to consider the contemporary speech driven breaking traditional paradigms that force the neutrality as added value to the production of knowledge.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research
AU  - Wellington Amâncio da silva
AU  - Elilia Camargo Rodrigues
Y1  - 2014/04/30
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 53
EP  - 58
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
AB  - This article discusses the relevance of qualitative and participatory methodologies in education, bearing in mind the principles etnopedagógicos in the construction of social research in the educational field. In circumstances of investigation the interactivity and participation are mediators in that process because it contributes to the identification and representation of subjectivation of the subjects researchers in insertions and engagement with the object of research. The identity is discussed as action and interaction of actors and IBM research. These theoretical, methodological components pertinent to symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, prioritize the subjectivity, the interaction and participation of the subjects in the polls from a micro vision to reach a understanding macro, proposed by etnométodos within the social research in contemporary times. Bibliographic search result, intends to consider the contemporary speech driven breaking traditional paradigms that force the neutrality as added value to the production of knowledge.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wellington Amâncio da silva
Elilia Camargo Rodrigues

Universidade do Estado da Bahia– Campus VIII / Professor in the courses in Pedagogy, Biology and Mathematics, Brazil

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wellington Amâncio da silva, Elilia Camargo Rodrigues. (2014). Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research. Social Sciences, 3(2), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wellington Amâncio da silva; Elilia Camargo Rodrigues. Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(2), 53-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wellington Amâncio da silva, Elilia Camargo Rodrigues. Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research. Soc Sci. 2014;3(2):53-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13,
  author = {Wellington Amâncio da silva and Elilia Camargo Rodrigues},
  title = {Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {53-58},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20140302.13},
  abstract = {This article discusses the relevance of qualitative and participatory methodologies in education, bearing in mind the principles etnopedagógicos in the construction of social research in the educational field. In circumstances of investigation the interactivity and participation are mediators in that process because it contributes to the identification and representation of subjectivation of the subjects researchers in insertions and engagement with the object of research. The identity is discussed as action and interaction of actors and IBM research. These theoretical, methodological components pertinent to symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, prioritize the subjectivity, the interaction and participation of the subjects in the polls from a micro vision to reach a understanding macro, proposed by etnométodos within the social research in contemporary times. Bibliographic search result, intends to consider the contemporary speech driven breaking traditional paradigms that force the neutrality as added value to the production of knowledge.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as Methods of Valuation of Subjectivities in Social Research
AU  - Wellington Amâncio da silva
AU  - Elilia Camargo Rodrigues
Y1  - 2014/04/30
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 53
EP  - 58
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140302.13
AB  - This article discusses the relevance of qualitative and participatory methodologies in education, bearing in mind the principles etnopedagógicos in the construction of social research in the educational field. In circumstances of investigation the interactivity and participation are mediators in that process because it contributes to the identification and representation of subjectivation of the subjects researchers in insertions and engagement with the object of research. The identity is discussed as action and interaction of actors and IBM research. These theoretical, methodological components pertinent to symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, prioritize the subjectivity, the interaction and participation of the subjects in the polls from a micro vision to reach a understanding macro, proposed by etnométodos within the social research in contemporary times. Bibliographic search result, intends to consider the contemporary speech driven breaking traditional paradigms that force the neutrality as added value to the production of knowledge.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download