Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship

Anika Wessel; Erich Kasten

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship

Anika Wessel, Erich Kasten

Published in American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 3, Issue 4)

Received: 16 July 2014 Accepted: 30 July 2014 Published: 10 August 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Goal was to examine the connection between piercings and self-mutilation and the practice of self-piercing. Participants (n=140) completed an anonymous online survey consisting of a 54-item questionnaire and a standardized personality test. All respondents were members of internet communities specialized on piercings. The majority of participants (77.1%) were female, 22.9% were male. The mean age of the group was 24.7 years (range: 16-57 years). Participants had an average of 8.9 piercings. More than half (57.9%) of participants were between 15 and 20 years old when they acquired their first piercing. The most common piercings reported were facial (in 82.9% of participants), ear cartilage (in 67.9% of participants), nipple (in 48.6% of participants) and genital piercings (in 45.0% of participants). Participants were asked to complete the NEO-FFI personality inventory, which is a tool used to measure the personality factors Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Extraversion, Openness and Neuroticism. Although all of the NEO-FFI results were within the average norm, significant differences between the participants with/without self-injury were found regarding the T-Scores for Neuroticism and Agreeableness. Thirty-one percent of the participants reported a history of self-mutilation. Those with a history of self-mutilation did not have more piercings than their peers. Half of these individuals described a decrease in auto-aggressive behavior since having acquired piercings, twenty-five percent claim to have ceased self-injurious behavior. The incidence of self-mutilation appears to be higher among pierced individuals than among the general public. Participants who had engaged in self-injury had significantly more often self-pierced. Piercings and self-piercings may serve as substitute behavior for self-mutilation in some individuals.

Published in	American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 3, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14
Page(s)	104-109
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Body Piercing, Self-Mutilation, Self-Piercing

References

[1]	Keller, A. et al. (2012). Nature Communications. New insights into the Tyrolean Iceman's origin and phenotype as inferred by whole-genome sequencing: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v3/n2/full/ncomms1701.html
[2]	Kasten, E. (2006). Body Modification: Psychological and medical aspects of piercing, tattoo, self-mutilation and other forms of body-modification (Body-Modification: Psychologische und medizinische Aspekte von Piercing, Tattoo, Selbstverletzung und anderen Körperveränderungen). München: Reinhardt.
[3]	Kasten, E. (2007). Genital body modification in women (Genitale Body-Modifications bei Frauen). Der Gynäkologe, 40(6): 489-500.
[4]	Forbes, G. B. (2001). College students with tattoos and piercing: motives, family experiences, personality factors and perception by others. Psychological Reports, 89(3): 774-786.
[5]	Wohlrab, A., Stahl, J., & Kappeler, P. (2007). Modifying the body: motivations for getting tattoed and pierced. Body Image, 4(1): 87-95.
[6]	De Mello, M. (2000). Bodies of inscription. A cultural history of the modern tattoo community. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[7]	Hewitt, K. (1997). Mutilating the body. Identity in blood and ink. Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
[8]	Stirn, A., & Hinz, A. (2008). Tattoos, body piercings, and self-injury: Is there a connection? Psychotherapy Research, 18(3): 326-333.
[9]	Bone, A., Ncube, F., Nichols, T., & Noah, N. (2008). Body piercing in England: a survey of piercing sites other than the earlobe. British Medical Journal, 336(7658): 1426-1428.
[10]	Stirn, A., Hinz, A., & Brähler, E. (2006). Prevalence of tattooing and body piercing in Germany and perception of health, mental disorder, and sensation seeking among the tattoed and body-pierced individuals. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(5): 531-534.
[11]	Klonsky, E., & Muehlenkamp, J. (2007). Self-Injury: a research review for the practitioner. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(11): 1045-1056.
[12]	Klonsky, E., Oltmanns, T., & Turkheimer, E. (2003). Deliberate self-harm in a nonclinical population: Prevalence and Psychological Correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(8): 1501-1508.
[13]	Hawton, K., Rodham, K., Evans, E., & Weatherall, R. (2002). Self-harm in adolescents: self-report survey in schools in England. British Medical Journal, 325(7374): 1207-1211.
[14]	D'Ambrosio, A., Casillo, N., & Martini, V. (2013). Piercings and tattoos: psychopathological aspects. Activitas Nervosa Superior Rediviva, 55(4):143-148.
[15]	Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) (NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI)) nach Costa und McCrae. Hogrefe.
[16]	Mahoney, M. (1977). Publication Prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(2): 161-175.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Anika Wessel, Erich Kasten. (2014). Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(4), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Anika Wessel; Erich Kasten. Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2014, 3(4), 104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Anika Wessel, Erich Kasten. Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship. Am J Appl Psychol. 2014;3(4):104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14,
  author = {Anika Wessel and Erich Kasten},
  title = {Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
  volume = {3},
  number = {4},
  pages = {104-109},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20140304.14},
  abstract = {Goal was to examine the connection between piercings and self-mutilation and the practice of self-piercing. Participants (n=140) completed an anonymous online survey consisting of a 54-item questionnaire and a standardized personality test. All respondents were members of internet communities specialized on piercings. The majority of participants (77.1%) were female, 22.9% were male. The mean age of the group was 24.7 years (range: 16-57 years). Participants had an average of 8.9 piercings. More than half (57.9%) of participants were between 15 and 20 years old when they acquired their first piercing. The most common piercings reported were facial (in 82.9% of participants), ear cartilage (in 67.9% of participants), nipple (in 48.6% of participants) and genital piercings (in 45.0% of participants). Participants were asked to complete the NEO-FFI personality inventory, which is a tool used to measure the personality factors Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Extraversion, Openness and Neuroticism. Although all of the NEO-FFI results were within the average norm, significant differences between the participants with/without self-injury were found regarding the T-Scores for Neuroticism and Agreeableness. Thirty-one percent of the participants reported a history of self-mutilation. Those with a history of self-mutilation did not have more piercings than their peers. Half of these individuals described a decrease in auto-aggressive behavior since having acquired piercings, twenty-five percent claim to have ceased self-injurious behavior. The incidence of self-mutilation appears to be higher among pierced individuals than among the general public. Participants who had engaged in self-injury had significantly more often self-pierced. Piercings and self-piercings may serve as substitute behavior for self-mutilation in some individuals.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship
AU - Anika Wessel
AU - Erich Kasten
Y1 - 2014/08/10
PY - 2014
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14
DO - 10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14
T2 - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JO - American Journal of Applied Psychology
SP - 104
EP - 109
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2328-5672
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14
AB - Goal was to examine the connection between piercings and self-mutilation and the practice of self-piercing. Participants (n=140) completed an anonymous online survey consisting of a 54-item questionnaire and a standardized personality test. All respondents were members of internet communities specialized on piercings. The majority of participants (77.1%) were female, 22.9% were male. The mean age of the group was 24.7 years (range: 16-57 years). Participants had an average of 8.9 piercings. More than half (57.9%) of participants were between 15 and 20 years old when they acquired their first piercing. The most common piercings reported were facial (in 82.9% of participants), ear cartilage (in 67.9% of participants), nipple (in 48.6% of participants) and genital piercings (in 45.0% of participants). Participants were asked to complete the NEO-FFI personality inventory, which is a tool used to measure the personality factors Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Extraversion, Openness and Neuroticism. Although all of the NEO-FFI results were within the average norm, significant differences between the participants with/without self-injury were found regarding the T-Scores for Neuroticism and Agreeableness. Thirty-one percent of the participants reported a history of self-mutilation. Those with a history of self-mutilation did not have more piercings than their peers. Half of these individuals described a decrease in auto-aggressive behavior since having acquired piercings, twenty-five percent claim to have ceased self-injurious behavior. The incidence of self-mutilation appears to be higher among pierced individuals than among the general public. Participants who had engaged in self-injury had significantly more often self-pierced. Piercings and self-piercings may serve as substitute behavior for self-mutilation in some individuals.
VL - 3
IS - 4
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Anika Wessel

Dept. of Internal Medicine, Johanniter Hospital Geesthacht, Geesthacht, Germany
Erich Kasten

Dept. of Neuropsychology, Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Anika Wessel, Erich Kasten. (2014). Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(4), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Anika Wessel; Erich Kasten. Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2014, 3(4), 104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Anika Wessel, Erich Kasten. Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship. Am J Appl Psychol. 2014;3(4):104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14,
  author = {Anika Wessel and Erich Kasten},
  title = {Body Piercing and Self-Mutilation: A Multifaceted Relationship},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
  volume = {3},
  number = {4},
  pages = {104-109},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20140304.14},
  abstract = {Goal was to examine the connection between piercings and self-mutilation and the practice of self-piercing. Participants (n=140) completed an anonymous online survey consisting of a 54-item questionnaire and a standardized personality test. All respondents were members of internet communities specialized on piercings. The majority of participants (77.1%) were female, 22.9% were male. The mean age of the group was 24.7 years (range: 16-57 years). Participants had an average of 8.9 piercings. More than half (57.9%) of participants were between 15 and 20 years old when they acquired their first piercing. The most common piercings reported were facial (in 82.9% of participants), ear cartilage (in 67.9% of participants), nipple (in 48.6% of participants) and genital piercings (in 45.0% of participants). Participants were asked to complete the NEO-FFI personality inventory, which is a tool used to measure the personality factors Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Extraversion, Openness and Neuroticism. Although all of the NEO-FFI results were within the average norm, significant differences between the participants with/without self-injury were found regarding the T-Scores for Neuroticism and Agreeableness. Thirty-one percent of the participants reported a history of self-mutilation. Those with a history of self-mutilation did not have more piercings than their peers. Half of these individuals described a decrease in auto-aggressive behavior since having acquired piercings, twenty-five percent claim to have ceased self-injurious behavior. The incidence of self-mutilation appears to be higher among pierced individuals than among the general public. Participants who had engaged in self-injury had significantly more often self-pierced. Piercings and self-piercings may serve as substitute behavior for self-mutilation in some individuals.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download