A Teacher and Researcher: A Scratch on the Science Community and Meaning of Evaluation with the Research Doctoral Programs Ranking
International Journal of Philosophy
Volume 3, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages: 34-46
Received: Aug. 21, 2015; Accepted: Aug. 31, 2015; Published: Sep. 8, 2015
Views 5203      Downloads 89
Kiyoung Kim, The Legal Research Institute, College of Law, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, South Korea
Hyun-Meong Ju, The Legal Research Institute, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, South Korea
Marium Khatun, The Legal Research Institute, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, South Korea
Article Tools
Follow on us
The epistemology and phenomenology of contemporary society tend to be deepened, and the philosophical challenges never are minimal that we may be called to face with the kind of post-modern chaos from the rapidly changing phenomena of the global community. The ballast held on the identity of faculty members as a teacher and researcher now turns due so as to be recast with our intrinsic of routine performance. I considered their quality as bent on the intellectual strife on the method and the kind of attitude, say, evaluation and consultation. In this paper, the authors have presented some thought and implications that triangulated the triad, i.e., research methodology, program evaluation and consulting illustration on the college research program rankings. The author is hoped that the discourse can help the academicians to share the attribute of different methods as well as the dimension of evaluation and consulting, perhaps essentially related with their work role in terms of teaching and researching.
Research Method, Qualitative Studies, Mixed Method, Program Evaluation, Theory and Philosophy, Program Rankings, Consulting, Journal Writing
To cite this article
Kiyoung Kim, Hyun-Meong Ju, Marium Khatun, A Teacher and Researcher: A Scratch on the Science Community and Meaning of Evaluation with the Research Doctoral Programs Ranking, International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015, pp. 34-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20150304.11
Baradaran, Shima (2014). Teaching Research Methods to Understand Business Crimes. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2014; University of Utah College of Law Research Paper, No. 81. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2442358 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2442358.
Babchuk, W. A. (2011). Grounded theory as a “family of methods”: A genealogical analysis to guide research. US-China Education Review, 8(2), 1548–1566.
Barbour, R. S. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the “evidence base” for clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6(2), 155–163.
Barritt, L. (1986). Human sciences and the human image. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 4(3), 14–22.
Bloland, H. G. (1995). Postmodernism and higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 521–559.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Clarkson, P. (1996). Researching the ‘therapeutic relationship’ in psychoanalysis, counselling psychology and psychotherapy—a qualitative inquiry. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 9(2), 143–163.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Vaile & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). New York: Oxford University Press.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
Creswell, J. W. (2009), Research design :Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approach, (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Dahnke, M. D., Dreher, H. M. (2010). Philosophy of science for nursing practice: concepts and application, New York. NY: Springer.
Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Ithaca, N Y: Cornell University Press.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hunt, E. F., Colander, D. C. (2015). Social Science: An Introduction to the Study of Society, New York. NY: Routledge.
Hurteau, M., Houle, S., & Mongiat, S. (2009). "How Legitimate and Justified are Judgments in Program Evaluation?". Evaluation 15 (3): 307–319. doi:10.1177/1356389009105883.
Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Kim, Kiyoung (2015). Concerning the Research and Science. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2592858 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2592858.
Kim, Kiyoung (2015). Some Temperance on the Doctoral Studies and On-Line Education, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2589531 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589531.
Kincheloe, J. L. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path of empowerment. London: Falmer Press.
Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 673–693.
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Research theory, design, and methods. Baltimore, MD: Author. "Doctoral Research : Social Change."
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2010e). Doctoral research: Preparing for qualitative research. Baltimore: Author.
Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
May, T., Malcolm, W. (1996). An introduction to the philosophy of social research, London. UK: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.
Mills, W. C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Cable & Telecommunications Association et al. v. Brand X Internet Services et al., 545 U.S. 967 (2005).
Neyman, V. L. (2011). Give my heart a voice: Reflections on self and others through the looking glass of pedagogy: An auto-ethnography. Doctoral dissertation, National-Louis University.
Reynold, P. D. (2007). A primer in theory construction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The phenomenological movement (3rd ed.). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stringer, E. T. (1993). Socially responsive educational research: Linking theory and practice. In D. J. Flinders & G. E. Mills (Eds.), Theory and concept in qualitative research: Perspectives from the field (pp. 141–162). New York: Teachers College Press.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186