International Journal of Philosophy

| Peer-Reviewed |

The Problem of the Sign in Philosophy of Postmodernism

Received: 8 July 2014    Accepted: 18 July 2014    Published: 10 August 2014
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Given article is devoted to the analysis of a problem of a sign essence in postmodernism philosophy on an example of Deleuze book "The logic of sense». Deleuze except the concepts accepted in a classical paradigm “denotation” and "meaning" enters one more concept of sense which does not merge with the proposition, nor with a state of affairs, designates which given offer. He leans on 4 element structure of a sign: expression, denotation, signification and sense. Deleuze uses this concept to challenge existing philosophical concepts of signification and to bypass the restrictions imposed by the representative theory of a sign.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11
Published in International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 2, Issue 3, June 2014)
Page(s) 31-35
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Expression, Denotation, Signification, Manifestation, Sense, Designation

References
[1] G. Deleuze. The Logic of Sense. - Columbia University Press, 1990.
[2] Russell B. On Denoting //The Philosophy of Language (3 edition), A. P. Martinich (ed.). - Oxford University Press, 1996. Р.112 – 126.
[3] The Frege Reader, ed. M. Beaney, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1997.
[4] Davidson D. Truth and Meaning. — Synthesis, 17 (1967). Pp. 304-323.
[5] Davidson D. Radical Interpretation. — Dialectica, 27 (1973). Pp. 313-327.
[6] Lewis D. Counterfactuals. Cambridge Mass., 1973
[7] Putnam H. Meaning and Reference. — Journal of Philosophy, 1973, v.70. P. 707.
[8] Putnam H. Representation and Reality. Cambridge Mass., 1988.
[9] Quine W. V. Word and Object. Cambridge Mass. — N.Y., 1960.
[10] Victor Novoselov. Sign and Reality, Social Sciences. Vol. 1, No.1,2012,pp.1-6 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/archive.aspx?journalid=202&issueid=2020101
[11] Victor Novoselov. The Problem of a Signs and World Objects Parity, International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, Vol 2 - No 12, 2013. pp. 1002-1007 : http://tijournals.com/index.php?action=showinpress&jid=6&pid=44
[12] Victor Novoselov. Meaning, Interpretation and Unlimited Semiosis. Social Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014, pp.5-8. http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo.aspx?journalid=202&doi=10.11648/j.ss.20140301.12
[13] Victor Novoselov. Meaning and Interpretation in a Context of Semiotics. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(3),149-151. http://www.sciepub.com/education/content/2/3#
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Victor Novoselov. (2014). The Problem of the Sign in Philosophy of Postmodernism. International Journal of Philosophy, 2(3), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Victor Novoselov. The Problem of the Sign in Philosophy of Postmodernism. Int. J. Philos. 2014, 2(3), 31-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Victor Novoselov. The Problem of the Sign in Philosophy of Postmodernism. Int J Philos. 2014;2(3):31-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11,
      author = {Victor Novoselov},
      title = {The Problem of the Sign in Philosophy of Postmodernism},
      journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {31-35},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20140203.11},
      abstract = {Given article is devoted to the analysis of a problem of a sign essence in postmodernism philosophy on an example of Deleuze book "The logic of sense». Deleuze except the concepts accepted in a classical paradigm “denotation” and "meaning" enters one more concept of sense which does not merge with the proposition, nor with a state of affairs, designates which given offer. He leans on 4 element structure of a sign: expression, denotation, signification and sense. Deleuze uses this concept to challenge existing philosophical concepts of signification and to bypass the restrictions imposed by the representative theory of a sign.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Problem of the Sign in Philosophy of Postmodernism
    AU  - Victor Novoselov
    Y1  - 2014/08/10
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11
    T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
    JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
    JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
    SP  - 31
    EP  - 35
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7455
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20140203.11
    AB  - Given article is devoted to the analysis of a problem of a sign essence in postmodernism philosophy on an example of Deleuze book "The logic of sense». Deleuze except the concepts accepted in a classical paradigm “denotation” and "meaning" enters one more concept of sense which does not merge with the proposition, nor with a state of affairs, designates which given offer. He leans on 4 element structure of a sign: expression, denotation, signification and sense. Deleuze uses this concept to challenge existing philosophical concepts of signification and to bypass the restrictions imposed by the representative theory of a sign.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Philosophy, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia

  • Sections