| Peer-Reviewed

Study on Resistant Action of Environmental Mass Incidents

Received: 5 December 2017    Accepted:     Published: 6 December 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Environment and resources have become the obvious problems with the rapid development of China, as a result, the resistant action of the public in environmental events becomes increasingly frequent. The mechanism of public collective action in environmental events is investigated in this paper through the qualitative comparative analysis on 13 public resistances against environmental issues during 2010-2014. The study finds that politics, scientific cognition, rumor, appeal, media, actio and disposal of pointing person are the key factors for the resistant action of environmental mass incidents. The risk perception and scientific cognition of mass against environmental projects are affected by information imbalance, in which rumors may aggravate the development of events and trigger violence among the public. In the Internet era, network public opinion can bring more attention to events, and reports from the central media reflect political "metaphor". It is an effective path to avoid environmental mass incidents for government to share the decision-making power with the public in managing environmental projects based on information dissemination and communication.

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14
Page(s) 215-221
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Environmental Events, Resistant Action, Case Study, Qualitative Comparative Study

References
[1] Zhang Ping, Yang Zuchan. Brief analysis on the characteristics of environmental mass incidents in China over the past ten years [J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, (02): 53-61.
[2] Zhang Youfu. Discussion on the main causes of environmental mass incidents and solutions [J]. Inheritance, 2010 (11).
[3] Liu Xiliang, Liu Xiuxiu. Analysis on the causes and countermeasures for environmental mass incidents based on the credibility of government [J]. Chinese Management Science, 2013, (S1): 153-158.
[4] Cheng Yuyan. Characteristics, causes and legal countermeasures of environmental mass incidents [J]. Journal of Guangdong Administrative College, 2007, (02): 46-49+81.
[5] Zheng Xutao. Analysis on the causes of preventive environmental mass incidents---- taking Shifang, Qidong and Ningbo cases as examples, [J]., Southeast academic, 2013, (03): 23-29.
[6] Rong Ting, Xie Yungeng. Occurrence, spread and respond of environmental mass incidents -- based on the empirical analysis of 150 major environmental mass incidents in China in 2003 ~ 2014 [J]. News Reporter, 2015, (06): 72-79.
[7] Dong Youhong. The theory of "NIMBY conflict" and its enlightenment on the governance of NIMBY mass incidents [J]. Journal of Shanghai Administrative College, 2013, (02): 21-30.
[8] Li Deying. NIMBY conflict and environmental contradictions in China -- based on the analysis on the causes of environmental conflicts and the differences between urban and rural areas [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, (01): 89-98+126.
[9] Li Chunlei, Ling Guoqing. Study on mobilization mechanism of micro-communities in environmental mass incidents -- based on the field investigation of Kunming PX incident [J]. Modern communication(Journal of Communication University of China), 2015, (06): 61-66.
[10] Li Yu, He Haibing. The study logic and application of qualitative comparative analysis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Administration College, 2015, (05): 92-100.
[11] Huang Ronggui, Zheng Wen, Gui Yong. Multi-channel strong intervention, framework and resistance results. Qualitative comparative analysis on fuzzy sets of 40 demolition resistance cases. [J]. sociological research, 2015, (05): 90-114+244.
[12] He Junzhi. Fuzzy set method in comparative political analysis [J]. Social Sciences, 2013, (05): 30-38.
[13] Guo Qingguang. Course of communication [M]. Beijing: Renmin University of China press, 2012., 84-88.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Delong Gao, Li Wang. (2017). Study on Resistant Action of Environmental Mass Incidents. Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(6), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Delong Gao; Li Wang. Study on Resistant Action of Environmental Mass Incidents. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2017, 5(6), 215-221. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Delong Gao, Li Wang. Study on Resistant Action of Environmental Mass Incidents. Humanit Soc Sci. 2017;5(6):215-221. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14,
      author = {Delong Gao and Li Wang},
      title = {Study on Resistant Action of Environmental Mass Incidents},
      journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
      volume = {5},
      number = {6},
      pages = {215-221},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20170506.14},
      abstract = {Environment and resources have become the obvious problems with the rapid development of China, as a result, the resistant action of the public in environmental events becomes increasingly frequent. The mechanism of public collective action in environmental events is investigated in this paper through the qualitative comparative analysis on 13 public resistances against environmental issues during 2010-2014. The study finds that politics, scientific cognition, rumor, appeal, media, actio and disposal of pointing person are the key factors for the resistant action of environmental mass incidents. The risk perception and scientific cognition of mass against environmental projects are affected by information imbalance, in which rumors may aggravate the development of events and trigger violence among the public. In the Internet era, network public opinion can bring more attention to events, and reports from the central media reflect political "metaphor". It is an effective path to avoid environmental mass incidents for government to share the decision-making power with the public in managing environmental projects based on information dissemination and communication.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Study on Resistant Action of Environmental Mass Incidents
    AU  - Delong Gao
    AU  - Li Wang
    Y1  - 2017/12/06
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14
    T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    SP  - 215
    EP  - 221
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8184
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170506.14
    AB  - Environment and resources have become the obvious problems with the rapid development of China, as a result, the resistant action of the public in environmental events becomes increasingly frequent. The mechanism of public collective action in environmental events is investigated in this paper through the qualitative comparative analysis on 13 public resistances against environmental issues during 2010-2014. The study finds that politics, scientific cognition, rumor, appeal, media, actio and disposal of pointing person are the key factors for the resistant action of environmental mass incidents. The risk perception and scientific cognition of mass against environmental projects are affected by information imbalance, in which rumors may aggravate the development of events and trigger violence among the public. In the Internet era, network public opinion can bring more attention to events, and reports from the central media reflect political "metaphor". It is an effective path to avoid environmental mass incidents for government to share the decision-making power with the public in managing environmental projects based on information dissemination and communication.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Center for Digitalized Culture and Media, School of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

  • School of Political Science and Public Administration, Center for Digitalized Culture and Media, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

  • Sections