Please enter verification code
Confirm
Providing General Excerpt of Philosophy for the First Time Readers
Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 8, Issue 6, November 2020, Pages: 177-181
Received: Sep. 10, 2020; Accepted: Oct. 15, 2020; Published: Nov. 11, 2020
Views 35      Downloads 20
Author
Agenagn Kebede, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Woldia University, Woldia, Amhara, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The purpose of this writing was to provide general excerpt of philosophy for the first time readers. This general excerpt of philosophy will minimize fundamental misunderstanding of philosophy. As my observation and experience, most of the time, in my country, Ethiopia and in my continent, Africa, individuals who are not study and know philosophy as a discipline, have not idea of what philosophy means. Even if they have idea of philosophy, their idea is out of the truck. For them everything is philosophy. Poem, dance, conversation and etc… are philosophy. The poet, the dancer, the informer and the talkative are philosophers. However, philosophy is not talking of trash events. It does not mean ordinary dialogue rather it is hard science which typically has its own scientific procedure and scientific investigation. Philosophers are persons who deal with science of wisdom: wisdom of knowledge, reality, ethics, politics and beauty. Accordingly, for the purpose, I, roughly, melting together the different topics of philosophy in to different branches of philosophy. Further, the unforgotten point over here is that I did document analysis as a baseline to give general expert of philosophy.
Keywords
Excerpt, Miller, Philosophy
To cite this article
Agenagn Kebede, Providing General Excerpt of Philosophy for the First Time Readers, Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2020, pp. 177-181. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20200806.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Alvin Goldman. (1987). Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology, in Human Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
[2]
Annas, J., and J. Barnes. (1985). The Modes of Scepticism. U.K: Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Baldwin, A. and S. Hutton, eds. (1994), Platonism and the English Imagination. Cambridge.
[4]
Barker, E. (1918). The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. London.
[5]
Barnes, J. (1984) (Ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[6]
Bonner, G. (1986). St Augustine of Hippo: We and controversies. Norwich.
[7]
Bosanquet, Bernard. (1913). The Distinction between Mind and Its Objects.
[8]
Broad, C. D. (1952). Ethics and the History of Philosophy: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.
[9]
Carnap, R. (1956). Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago, Phoenix Books.
[10]
Clanchy, Michael and Abelard. (1997). A Medieval Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
[11]
Eaton, Marcia and Merit. (2000). Aesthetic and Ethical. New York: Oxford University Press.
[12]
Frederick Copleston, S. J. (1963). A History of Philosophy. London: Search Press.
[13]
Hume, David. (n.d.). Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. London.
[14]
J. S. McCelland. (1996). A History of Western Political Thought. London and New-York: Routledge.
[15]
J. W. H. Atkins. (1934). Literary Criticism in Antiquity. Cambridge, V. 1.
[16]
Joy E. Beatty, J. S. (2009). Philosophy and Education. Journal of Management.
[17]
Jonathan Barnes. (1984) (Ed). Nicomachean Ethics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle. NJ: Princeton University Press.
[18]
Le Blond, J. M. (1939). Logique et mothode chez Aristotle, Paris.
[19]
Kirk, G. S., and J. E. Raven. (1957). The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. U.K: Cambridge University Press, p. 143–162.
[20]
Long, A. A, and D. N. Sedley.(1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. U.K: Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Mill, John Stuart. (1859). On Liberty. Unlicensed Printing is the Life Blood of Literature.
[22]
Mill, John Stuart, and Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Edited by Alan Ryan. London: Penguin Books, 1987.
[23]
Miller. (1984). Question that Matter: An Invitation to Philosophy. McGraw-Hill.
[24]
Nik Rushdi Hassan, J. M. (2018). Philosophy and Information Systems? Where are We and Where Should We Go? European Journal of Information, 263-277.
[25]
Nobis, M. M. (2004). Truth in Ethics and Epistemology: A Defense of Normative Realism (Dissertation). New-York: University of Rochester.
[26]
Payne, R. (2015). An Introduction to Philosophy.
[27]
Ramiz, R. (2016). New Perspective for the Philosophy: Reconstruction and Definition of New Branches of Philosophy. Philosophy Study, 6 (6).
[28]
Simashenkov, P. D. (2019). Ideological Surpassing of Philosophy. Modern European Research, 4.
[29]
Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Studies, I. I. (Ed.). (2011). Paper for Conference on Rethinking Development: Ethics and Social Inclusion. Erasmus University.
[31]
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. England: Penguin.
[32]
Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London.
[33]
Woolf, Raphael. (2009). Pleasure and Desire. The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186