| Peer-Reviewed

A remote sensing approach to understanding the archaeological potential: the case study of some Roman evidence in Umbria (Italy)

Received: 21 November 2014    Accepted: 24 November 2014    Published: 31 December 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In Umbria, the transformation from Roman pagan building to church seems to be frequent during the beginning of the Middle Age thanks to Longobards and Byzantines. The rural church of San Lorenzo in Nifili (close to Montecastrilli - TR) is a very good example of this. The aim of this work is to understand the evolution of the ancient landscape around this church, from Roman to modern period, using data coming from both the subsurface and the space, using the GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) method and the satellite imageries, respectively. Particular data processing to define the evolution of this ancient landscape in southern Umbria is described in this paper. The results not only represent an effective and non-destructive methodology for discovering, recovering and understanding archaeological data, but also give the possibility to obtain archaeological potential values of different areas in order to better plan future researches in this area.

Published in International Journal of Archaeology (Volume 3, Issue 1-1)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Archaeological Sciences

DOI 10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15
Page(s) 37-44
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Remote Sensing, NDT, GPR, Satellite Imagery Analysis, Roman Empire, San Lorenzo, Umbria

References
[1] S. Carpinelli, and S. Chianella, “La chiesa di San Lorenzo in Nifili nella Parrocchia di Farnetta”, in M. Corradi, M. (ed) Castrum Farnectae,le famiglie la storia le cronache di un castello umbro. Del Gallo, Spoleto, 2005.
[2] R. Almagià, “Monumenta Cartographica Vaticana, II, Carte geografiche a stampa di particolare pregio o rarità dei secoli XVI e XVII esistenti nella Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana”, Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1948.
[3] F. Ronca, and A. Volpini, “Alla ricerca dei confini. L’Umbria nella cartografia storica dal XVI all’unità d’Italia”, Terni, Arti grafiche, 2011.
[4] R. Volpi, “Le regioni introvabili. Centralizzazione e regionalizzazione dello Stato Pontificio”, Bologna, il Mulino, 1983.
[5] L. Desibio, “Territory and Borders in Southern Umbria and the Christianization of pagan sanctuaries” in Proceedings of the Frontiers of the European Iron Age Conference, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 11-12.
[6] G. Pavan, “Il tempio d’Augusto di Pola, Istituto Giuliano di Storia, Cultura e Documentazione”, Collana di Architettura 2, Trieste-Gorizia, 2000.
[7] P. Zanker, “The Power of images in the Age of August”, University of Michigan Press, 1990.
[8] L. Bonomi Ponzi, and C. Giontella, “L' Umbria meridionale dalla protostoria all'alto Medioevo”, Interamna. Quaderni di Storia dell’Arte, Terni, 1995.
[9] Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, XI, 4662.
[10] S. Sisani, “Fenomenologia della conquista: la romanizzazione dell'Umbria tra il IV sec. a.C. e la Guerra Sociale”, Roma, Quasar, 2007.
[11] S. Diebner, “Cippi Carsulani”, Archeologia Classica, 38, pp. 35-66.
[12] S.H. Parcak, “Satellite Remote Sensing for archaeology”, Routledge, 2009.
[13] C. S. Arvind, Ashoka Vanjare, S. N. Omkar, J. Senthilnath, V. Mani, P. G. Diwakar, “Multi-temporal Satellite Image Analysis Using Unsupervised Techniques”, in Advances in Computing and Information Technology, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Volume 177, 2013, pp. 757-765. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31552-7_77
[14] S. Brutzer, B. Höferlin, and G. Heidemann, “Evaluation of Background Subtraction Techniques for Video Surveillance”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, 2011, pp. 1937-1944. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995508
[15] K. Saheb, R. Farah, Bassel S., and Ben-Ahmed M., “Toward a Multi-Temporal Approach for Satellite Image Interpretation”, The International Arab Journal of Information and Technology, 5, 3, 2008, pp. 281-287.
[16] L. Bruzzone, “Current scenario and challenges in the analysis of multitemporal remote sensing images”, GRSS-IEEE, 2010.
[17] S. Herrero, and J. Bescòs, “Background subtraction techniques: Systematic evaluation and comparative analysis”, in Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems, Springer, 2009, pp. 33-42. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04697-1_4
[18] L. Orlando, and E. Slob, “Using multicomponent GPR to monitor cracks in a historical building”, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67, 2009, pp. 327-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.003
[19] V. Perez-Gracia, J.O. Caselles, J. Clapes, G. Martinez, and R. Osorio, “Non-destructive analysis in cultural heritage buildings: Evaluating the Mallorca cathedral supporting structures”. NDT & E International, 59, 2013, pp. 40-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.04.014
[20] E. Pettinelli, P.M. Barone, A. Di Matteo, E. Mattei, and S.E. Lauro, “Radio waves technique for non-destructive archaeological investigations”, Contemporary Physics, 52, 2, 2011, pp. 121 – 130. DOI: 10.1080/00107514.2010.545208
[21] E. Pettinelli, P.M. Barone, E. Mattei, A. Di Matteo, and F. Soldovieri, “Archaeology and Cultural Heritage”, in A.S. Turk, A.K. Hocaoglu, and A.A. Vertiy (eds.), Subsurface Sensing, Wiley, 2011, pp. 644-667.
[22] E. Pettinelli, P.M. Barone, A. Di Matteo, E. Mattei, and S.E. Lauro, Mapping the undiscovered ruins of Pompeii (Naples, Italy) using Ground-penetrating Radar, Archaeometry, 54, 1, 2012, pp. 203-212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00599.x
[23] P.M. Barone, A. Di Matteo, F. Graziano, E. Mattei, and E. Pettinelli, “GPR application to historical buildings structural control”, Near Surface Geophysics, 8, 5, 2010, pp. 407-413: DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2010017
[24] P.M. Barone, S.E. Lauro, E. Mattei, and E. Pettinelli, “Non-destructive technique to investigate an archaeological structure: a GPR survey in the Domus Aurea (Rome, Italy)”, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Lecce, GPR 2010, IEEE, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/ICGPR.2010.5550087
[25] P.M. Barone, T. Bellomo, E. Mattei, S.E. Lauro, and E. Pettinelli, “Ground-penetrating Radar in the Regio III (Pompeii, Italy): Archaeological Evidence”, Archaeological Prospection, 18, 3, 2011, pp. 187-194. DOI: 10.1002/arp.405
[26] P.M. Barone, C. Ferrara, and E. Pettinelli, “How could Archeo-Geophysics help garbage disposal? A fortuitous discovery in Central Italy”, Antiqua, 2, 1, 2012, pp. e3. DOI: 10.4081/antiqua.2012.e3
[27] P.M. Barone, C. Ferrara, and E. Pettinelli, “Advanced ground penetrating radar applied to landscape archaeology and cultural heritage”, in Vermeulen F. and Corsi C. (eds.), Non-destructive approaches to complex archaeological sites in Europe: a round-up, Ghent University, 2013. ISBN 978-94-6197-109-8
[28] P.M. Barone, E. Mattei, and E. Pettinelli, “Non-invasive archaeological exploration in stratigraphically complex rural settings: an example from Ferento (Viterbo, Italy)”, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 5, 3, 2013, pp. 267-273. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-013-0138-3
[29] P.M. Barone, and E. Pettinelli, Non-destructive techniques in archaeology: recent GPR investigations in Crustumerium, in Attema P.A.J., Di Gennaro F. and Jarva E. (eds.), Crustumerium. Ricerche internazionali in un centro latino. Archaeology and identity of a Latin settlement near Rome, vol. 1, 2013, pp. 45-53.
[30] A.P. Annan, “Ground Penetrating Radar: principles, procedures & applications”, Sensors & Software, Inc, 2004, Technical paper.
[31] H. Jol, “Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications”, Elsevier, 2009.
[32] D. Scortecci, “Trasformazione degli edifici pagani in edifici di culto cristiano”, in Umbria cristiana. Dalla diffusione del culto al culto dei santi (secc. IV-X), Atti del 15° Congresso internazionale di studi sull’Alto Medioevo, Spoleto 23-28 ottobre 2000, Spoleto, Centro italiano di studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 2001, pp. 367-92.
[33] C. Orton, “A Bayesian approach to a problem of archaeological site evaluation”, in K. Lockyear, T.J.T. Sly, and V. Mihailescu-Birliba (eds.), CAA96, Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, BAR International Series 845, archaeopress, Oxford, 2000.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Pier Matteo Barone, Luca Desibio. (2014). A remote sensing approach to understanding the archaeological potential: the case study of some Roman evidence in Umbria (Italy). International Journal of Archaeology, 3(1-1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Pier Matteo Barone; Luca Desibio. A remote sensing approach to understanding the archaeological potential: the case study of some Roman evidence in Umbria (Italy). Int. J. Archaeol. 2014, 3(1-1), 37-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Pier Matteo Barone, Luca Desibio. A remote sensing approach to understanding the archaeological potential: the case study of some Roman evidence in Umbria (Italy). Int J Archaeol. 2014;3(1-1):37-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15,
      author = {Pier Matteo Barone and Luca Desibio},
      title = {A remote sensing approach to understanding the archaeological potential: the case study of some Roman evidence in Umbria (Italy)},
      journal = {International Journal of Archaeology},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1-1},
      pages = {37-44},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ija.s.2015030101.15},
      abstract = {In Umbria, the transformation from Roman pagan building to church seems to be frequent during the beginning of the Middle Age thanks to Longobards and Byzantines. The rural church of San Lorenzo in Nifili (close to Montecastrilli - TR) is a very good example of this. The aim of this work is to understand the evolution of the ancient landscape around this church, from Roman to modern period, using data coming from both the subsurface and the space, using the GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) method and the satellite imageries, respectively. Particular data processing to define the evolution of this ancient landscape in southern Umbria is described in this paper. The results not only represent an effective and non-destructive methodology for discovering, recovering and understanding archaeological data, but also give the possibility to obtain archaeological potential values of different areas in order to better plan future researches in this area.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A remote sensing approach to understanding the archaeological potential: the case study of some Roman evidence in Umbria (Italy)
    AU  - Pier Matteo Barone
    AU  - Luca Desibio
    Y1  - 2014/12/31
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15
    T2  - International Journal of Archaeology
    JF  - International Journal of Archaeology
    JO  - International Journal of Archaeology
    SP  - 37
    EP  - 44
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7595
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.s.2015030101.15
    AB  - In Umbria, the transformation from Roman pagan building to church seems to be frequent during the beginning of the Middle Age thanks to Longobards and Byzantines. The rural church of San Lorenzo in Nifili (close to Montecastrilli - TR) is a very good example of this. The aim of this work is to understand the evolution of the ancient landscape around this church, from Roman to modern period, using data coming from both the subsurface and the space, using the GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) method and the satellite imageries, respectively. Particular data processing to define the evolution of this ancient landscape in southern Umbria is described in this paper. The results not only represent an effective and non-destructive methodology for discovering, recovering and understanding archaeological data, but also give the possibility to obtain archaeological potential values of different areas in order to better plan future researches in this area.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 1-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Archaeology and Classics Program, The American University of Rome, Via P. Roselli, 4 – 00153 Rome, Italy

  • Freelance Archaeologist, Rome, Italy

  • Sections