Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna

Hayatu; Mohammed; Kutama A. S.; Auyo; M. I.; Umar S.; M. L. Umar

doi:doi:10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna

Hayatu, Mohammed, Kutama A. S., Auyo, M. I., Umar S., M. L. Umar

Published in Plant (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 12 December 2013 Accepted: Published: 20 March 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Rosette has been a constraint to the production of groundnut in the existing farming system which contributes to the poor productivity of this crop. This trial was conducted in the screen-house of IITA Kano station, Nigeria to screen some groundnut varieties to rosette disease. The following parameters were measured during the trial such as chlorophyll content, plant vigor, disease incidence,50% day to flower and grain yield. The result showed that chlorophyll content of the varieties 19BT and ICGV-IS-07825 showed no significant difference in their measurement at 7 days after infestation. At 14 days 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09011 measured low chlorophyll content and at 21 days after infestation the chlorophyll content of all the plants in the Trials measured slight difference. Slight difference was recorded in plant vigor for the spray Trial and the non-spray were almost the same 21 days after infestation. There was no disease incidence in the spray Trial. Four varieties 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825, ICGV-IS-08872 and ICGV-IS-09011 in the non-spray had highest disease incidence and ICGV-IS-09982 recorded least incidence. Number of first day and 50% day to flower was measured and the result showed that rosette does not have effect on flowering date of groundnut since the both Trial flowered at the same time. 19BT and ICGV-IS-08872 measured highest number in grains and pod weight. ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09982 measured least in number of grains and in pod weight in both Trials. It is concluded that resistance to groundnut rosette lutoevirus (GRVA) is not currently available in cultivated groundnut. More concerted effects are required where management packages can be put into proper practice.

Published in	Plant (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11
Page(s)	14-19
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Groundnut Varieties, Rosette, Screening, Sudan Savanna, Nigeria

References

[1]	A’Brook, J. (2007). The effect of planting date and spacing on the incidence of groundnut rosette disease and of the vector, Aphis craccivora Koch, at Mokwa, Northern Nigeria. Annals of Applied Biology 54:199-208
[2]	Ambang Z, Ndongo B, Bime, Ngoh D, Maho Y, Ntsomboh G (2008) Effect of mycorrhizal inoculum and urea fertilizer on diseases development and yield of groundnut crops (Arachis hypogaeaL.). African Journal of Biotechnology 7(16): 2823-2827.
[3]	Anon, Ann. Progr. Rep., SADC/ICRISAT Groundnut project, (1996) Chitedze Research Station, Malawi. Bock, K.R., Murant, A.F. and Rajeshwari, R. 1990. The nature of resistance in groundnut to rosette disease. Annals of Applied Biology 117:379-380
[4]	Bovey R, Baggiolini M, Bolay A, Trivelli G (1994) La défense des plantescultivées. 14è édition, MaisonRustique, Paris. p 866.
[5]	Blackman.R.L and V.F. Eastrop (1999) Aphids on the world trees. An identification and information Guide Wallingford: CAB international. ISBN 0-8519877-6.
[6]	Charles T. Munger(2003) Application of quantitative concepts and techniques in undergraduate Biology 2nd edition USA. Farrell, J.A.K. (2009). Effects of groundnut crop density on the population dynamics of Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera, Aphididae) in Malawi.Bulletin of Entomological Research 66:317-329.
[7]	Feruse .P. and M. Arkersivora., (2001). Variability of chlorophyll content under fluctuating environment. Act of technique zartech nica, Vol 4, 2001, special Number, in: the Proceedings of the international scientific conference on the occasion of the 55th Anniversary of the Salvat Agricultural University in Nitra.
[8]	Gibbons, R. W. (1997). Groundnut rosette virus. In: Diseases of Tropical Crops. Kranz, J., Schutter, J. and Koch, W., (Eds.), pp 19-21, Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.
[9]	ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics), (1992). The medium term plan, 1994-98, Vol I. Main Report. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru P.O., Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India.88 pp.
[10]	Lane, P.W. and Payne, R.W. (1996). GENSTAT for windows: an introductory course. Second Edition, Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK.
[11]	Ma,winbon (2011) How do plants fight disease. Riverside clue USA. Murant, A. F., Robinson, D. J. and Gibbs, M. J. (1995). Genus Umbra virus. In: Virus Taxonomy - Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. Sixth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses. Murphy, F.M., Fauquet, C.M., Bishop, D.H.L., Ghabrial, S.A., Jarvis, A.W., Martelli, G.P., Mayo, M.A. and Summers, M.D. (Eds.), pp 388-391, Springer-Verlag, Vienna.
[12]	Naidu, R.A., Kimmins, F.M., Deom, C.M., Subrahmanyam, P., Chiyembekeza, A.J. and vander Merwe, P.J.A. (1999). Groundnut rosette: a virus disease affecting groundnut production in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Disease 83:700-701.
[13]	Olorunju, P.E., Kuhn, C.W., Demski, J.W., Misari, S.M. and Ansa, O.A. (1991). Disease reactions and yield performance of peanut genotypes grown under groundnut rosette and rosette-free field environments. Plant Disease 75: 1269-1270.
[14]	D. Robinson, R.A. Naidu , and F.M. Kimmins, "Aspects of the epidemiology and control of groundnut rosette disease," International Working Group on legume virus diseases. Australia. August 1999.
[15]	P Subramanian, G.L.Hildebrand, , R.A.Naidu, , L.J.Reddy, and A.K.Singh, (1998). Sources of resistance to groundnut rosette disease in global groundnut germplasm.Annals of Applied Biology 132:473-474.
[16]	Talukder MT, Sarwar KS, Khan S (2002) viral diseases of groundnut in Brahmaputra alluvial soil of Bangladesh. Bulletin of the Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kyushu University 25:15-16
[17]	Umeh, V. C. ,Walyyar, F. , Traoré, S., Chaibou, I. M., Omar, B., Detognon J. (2001). Farmers' opinions and influence of cultural practices on soil pest damage to groundnut in West Africa. Insect Sci. Applic. Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 23-24.
[18]	Kutama, A. S., Binta, U. B., Umar, S. and Umar, M. L. (2013): Effects of Different Levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on the Growth and Disease Incidence of Groundnut Leaf Spot Caused by Cercospora arachidicola. International Journal of Applied Research and Technology. 2(8): 94 – 100.
[19]	Kutama, A.S., Umar, S., Binta, U.B. and Tijjani, A. (2013): Methods For The Screening Of Sorghum Germplasm Against Sorghum Head And Loose Smuts In Nigeria. Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science,2(9):246-251
[20]	Kutama, A.S., Hayatu, M., Umar, S. and M. L., Umar (2013) Evaluation of some Techniques used for the Screening of Some Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) Genotypes against Bacterial blight. Standard Res. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 1(3):41-46

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hayatu, Mohammed, Kutama A. S., Auyo, M. I., et al. (2014). Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna. Plant, 2(2), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hayatu; Mohammed; Kutama A. S.; Auyo; M. I., et al. Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna. Plant. 2014, 2(2), 14-19. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hayatu, Mohammed, Kutama A. S., Auyo, M. I., et al. Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna. Plant. 2014;2(2):14-19. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11,
  author = {Hayatu and Mohammed and Kutama A. S. and Auyo and M. I. and Umar S. and M. L. Umar},
  title = {Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna},
  journal = {Plant},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {14-19},
  doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20140202.11},
  abstract = {Rosette has been a constraint to the production of groundnut in the existing farming system which contributes to the poor productivity of this crop. This trial was conducted in the screen-house of IITA Kano station, Nigeria to screen some groundnut varieties to rosette disease. The following parameters were measured during the trial such as chlorophyll content, plant vigor, disease incidence,50% day to flower and grain yield. The result showed that chlorophyll content of the varieties 19BT and ICGV-IS-07825 showed no significant difference in their measurement at 7 days after infestation. At 14 days 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09011 measured low chlorophyll content and at 21 days after infestation the chlorophyll content of all the plants in the Trials measured slight difference. Slight difference was recorded in plant vigor for the spray Trial and the non-spray were almost the same 21 days after infestation. There was no disease incidence in the spray Trial. Four varieties 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825, ICGV-IS-08872 and ICGV-IS-09011 in the non-spray had highest disease incidence and ICGV-IS-09982 recorded least incidence. Number of first day and 50% day to flower was measured and the result showed that rosette does not have effect on flowering date of groundnut since the both Trial flowered at the same time. 19BT and ICGV-IS-08872 measured highest number in grains and pod weight. ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09982 measured least in number of grains and in pod weight in both Trials. It is concluded that resistance to groundnut rosette lutoevirus (GRVA) is not currently available in cultivated groundnut. More concerted effects are required where management packages can be put into proper practice.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna
AU - Hayatu
AU - Mohammed
AU - Kutama A. S.
AU - Auyo
AU - M. I.
AU - Umar S.
AU - M. L. Umar
Y1 - 2014/03/20
PY - 2014
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11
DO - 10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11
T2 - Plant
JF - Plant
JO - Plant
SP - 14
EP - 19
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2331-0677
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11
AB - Rosette has been a constraint to the production of groundnut in the existing farming system which contributes to the poor productivity of this crop. This trial was conducted in the screen-house of IITA Kano station, Nigeria to screen some groundnut varieties to rosette disease. The following parameters were measured during the trial such as chlorophyll content, plant vigor, disease incidence,50% day to flower and grain yield. The result showed that chlorophyll content of the varieties 19BT and ICGV-IS-07825 showed no significant difference in their measurement at 7 days after infestation. At 14 days 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09011 measured low chlorophyll content and at 21 days after infestation the chlorophyll content of all the plants in the Trials measured slight difference. Slight difference was recorded in plant vigor for the spray Trial and the non-spray were almost the same 21 days after infestation. There was no disease incidence in the spray Trial. Four varieties 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825, ICGV-IS-08872 and ICGV-IS-09011 in the non-spray had highest disease incidence and ICGV-IS-09982 recorded least incidence. Number of first day and 50% day to flower was measured and the result showed that rosette does not have effect on flowering date of groundnut since the both Trial flowered at the same time. 19BT and ICGV-IS-08872 measured highest number in grains and pod weight. ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09982 measured least in number of grains and in pod weight in both Trials. It is concluded that resistance to groundnut rosette lutoevirus (GRVA) is not currently available in cultivated groundnut. More concerted effects are required where management packages can be put into proper practice.
VL - 2
IS - 2
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Hayatu
Mohammed
Kutama A. S.

Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Federal University, Dutse, Jigawa state, Nigeria
Auyo
M. I.
Umar S.

Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts, Sciences and Remedial Studies, Kano
M. L. Umar

Department of Plant Science, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hayatu, Mohammed, Kutama A. S., Auyo, M. I., et al. (2014). Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna. Plant, 2(2), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hayatu; Mohammed; Kutama A. S.; Auyo; M. I., et al. Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna. Plant. 2014, 2(2), 14-19. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hayatu, Mohammed, Kutama A. S., Auyo, M. I., et al. Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna. Plant. 2014;2(2):14-19. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11,
  author = {Hayatu and Mohammed and Kutama A. S. and Auyo and M. I. and Umar S. and M. L. Umar},
  title = {Screening of Some Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Against Rosette Disease in Nigerian Sudan Savanna},
  journal = {Plant},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {14-19},
  doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20140202.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20140202.11},
  abstract = {Rosette has been a constraint to the production of groundnut in the existing farming system which contributes to the poor productivity of this crop. This trial was conducted in the screen-house of IITA Kano station, Nigeria to screen some groundnut varieties to rosette disease. The following parameters were measured during the trial such as chlorophyll content, plant vigor, disease incidence,50% day to flower and grain yield. The result showed that chlorophyll content of the varieties 19BT and ICGV-IS-07825 showed no significant difference in their measurement at 7 days after infestation. At 14 days 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09011 measured low chlorophyll content and at 21 days after infestation the chlorophyll content of all the plants in the Trials measured slight difference. Slight difference was recorded in plant vigor for the spray Trial and the non-spray were almost the same 21 days after infestation. There was no disease incidence in the spray Trial. Four varieties 19BT, ICGV-IS-07825, ICGV-IS-08872 and ICGV-IS-09011 in the non-spray had highest disease incidence and ICGV-IS-09982 recorded least incidence. Number of first day and 50% day to flower was measured and the result showed that rosette does not have effect on flowering date of groundnut since the both Trial flowered at the same time. 19BT and ICGV-IS-08872 measured highest number in grains and pod weight. ICGV-IS-07825 and ICGV-IS-09982 measured least in number of grains and in pod weight in both Trials. It is concluded that resistance to groundnut rosette lutoevirus (GRVA) is not currently available in cultivated groundnut. More concerted effects are required where management packages can be put into proper practice.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download