Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizers Types and Rates for Better Production of Wheat at Angecha Woreda
Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2019, Pages: 21-24
Received: Jul. 18, 2019;
Accepted: Aug. 12, 2019;
Published: Aug. 20, 2019
Views 363 Downloads 190
Yehuala Alemneh, Natural Resource Management Directorate, Southern Agricultural Research Institution, Areka Agricultural Research Center, Wolayta, Ethiopia
Tsadiku Bamud, Natural Resource Management Directorate, Southern Agricultural Research Institution, Areka Agricultural Research Center, Wolayta, Ethiopia
Follow on us
The field experiment was conducting during 2016/17 cropping season at angecha testing site of Areka Agricultural Research center, southern Ethiopia to evaluate the effect of blended fertilizer on yield of wheat with the treatments of seven replicated three times across farmers in RCBD design. An approximate geographical coordinates of the testing site is 7o 0’ N latitude and 38o 29’E longitude having an altitude of 2381meteres above sea level. The treatments were control (no fertilizer), three rates of NPS (46N, 54 P2O5, 10 S; 69N, 72 P2O5, 13 S and 92N, 90 P2O5, 17 S,) and three rates of NPSCu (T2 + Cu; T3 + Cu and T4 + Cu). The plot size was 4 m by 4 m (16m2) and the spacing between plots and blocks was 50 cm and 100 cm, respectively. The result of this experiment also has substantiated the importance application of on yield of wheat NPSCu (combination of Cu with macronutrients NPS) fertilizers in improving yield of wheat in Angecha woreda. Despite the need of verification in multi-locations and soil types for wider use, application of NPSCu can be recommended for wheat production in the study area.
Blended, Wheat, Fertilizer, Cereal
To cite this article
Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizers Types and Rates for Better Production of Wheat at Angecha Woreda, Plant.
Vol. 7, No. 2,
2019, pp. 21-24.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
AbiyeAstatke, Tekalign Mamo, Peden, D. and M. Diedhiou. 2003. Participatory On-farm conservation tillage trial in Ethiopian highland vertisols: The impact of potassium application on crop yield. Experimental Agriculture 40: 369-379.
Asgelil D, Taye B, Yesuf A (2007). The status of Micro-nutrients in Nitisols, Vertisois, Cambisols and Fluvisols in major Maize, Wheat, Teff and Citrus growing areas of Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of Agricultural Research Fund, pp 77-96.
EthioSIS (Ethiopian Soils Information System). 2013. Status of soil resources in Ethiopia and priorities for sustainable management, GSP for eastern and southern Africa Mar 25-27, 2013 Nairobi, Kenya.
Girma Workineh, Gobeze Lohaand Legese Hidoto, (2017). Response of Potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) to Nitrogen Fertilizer Application at Angecha, Southern Ethiopia, Journal of Natural Sciences Research.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. (1984) Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research—Hand Book. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Hussain MI and SH Shah. (2002). Growth, yield and quality response of three wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) varieties to different levels of N, P and K. Int. J. of Agri. and Bio. 4 (3): 362-364.
Iqtidar H, Muhammad AK and AK Ejaz. (2006). Bread wheat varieties as influenced by different nitrogen levels. J.; Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 7 (1): 70-78.
Sahlemedhin Sertsue and Taye Bekele, 2000. Procedures for soil and plant analysis. National Soil Research Center, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 110 p.
Wassie H and Shiferaw B (2011): Response of Irish potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) to the application of potassium at acidic soils of Chencha, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. & Biol. 13: 595–598.
Wortmann, C. S., and C. K. Kai zzi. 1998. Nutrient balances and expected elects of alternative practice s in farming systems of Uganda. Agric. Ecosyst. E nviron. 71: 115–129. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00135-2.