| Peer-Reviewed

Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Performance of Wheat Crop Through Application of Urea Stable and Conventional Urea in Vertisols of Ambo District

Published in Plant (Volume 8, Issue 3)
Received: 25 September 2020    Accepted: 13 October 2020    Published: 23 November 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Nitrogen is the most yield liming nutrient that can be highly soluble and lost through leaching, volatilization and denitrification. In this view an experiment was conducted to determine the effects of urea stable and convectional urea on nitrogen use efficiency and crop performance of wheat in Vertisols of Ambo District, west Shewa Zone. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments were different rate of urea stable and convectional urea applied at planting and in split: (Control, 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting, 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting). Agronomic use efficiency was significantly varied among applied urea stable and convectional urea during first year. Significantly higher (32.77 and 40.8 kg grain/ kg N applied) agronomic efficiency of wheat from farm one (1) and two (2) were recorded by application of 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split form. Mean grain yield, dry biomass, harvest index, plant height and spike length of wheat were significantly affected with application of urea stable and convectional urea. The highest mean spike length (6.6cm), plant height (80cm), harvest index (45%) and thousand seed weight (45g) were recorded from split application of 69 kg N ha-1 in the form of urea stable fertilizer. Wheat grain yield of 3623 kg ha-1 and dry biomass 8921 kg ha-1 were recorded from split application of 69 kg N ha-1 from conventional urea fertilizer. Statistically significant difference of yield and yield components of wheat were not observed by applying similar rate of urea stable and convectional urea. Therefore, urea stable and convectional urea could be used as alternatively for wheat production in study area.

Published in Plant (Volume 8, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14
Page(s) 72-79
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Urea Stable, Wheat, Nitrogen, Nutrient Use Efficiency

References
[1] Malhi, S. S., Grant, C. A., Johnston, A. M. and Gill, K. S. 2001. Nitrogen fertilization management for no-till cereal production in the Canadian Great Plains: a review. Soil and Tillage Research, 60: 101-122.
[2] Spiertz. J. H. J. 2010. Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30 (1): 43-55.
[3] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2008. Guidelines on Nitrogen Management in Agricultural Systems: Training course series No. 29, Austria.
[4] Dai, X., Ouyang, Z., Li, Y. and Wang H. 2013. Variation in Yield Gap Induced by Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer in North China Plain. PLos one, 8 (12): 1-8.
[5] Williamson. J. M. 2011. The Role of Information and Prices in the Nitrogen Fertilizer management Decision: New Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36 (3): 552-572.
[6] Xiangbei D., Min X. and Lingcong K. 2019. Split application of reduced nitrogen rate improves nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in sweet potato. Springer, 9: 14058 https: doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50532-2.
[7] Bouwman A. F., Boumans L. J. and Batjes N. H. 2002. Emissions of N2O and NO from fertilized fields: summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16 (4): 6–13.
[8] Finck, A. 1992. Fertilizers and their efficient use. In: World Fertilizer Use Manual. Halliday, D. J., Renkel, M. E. and Wichmann, W. (Eds). International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, France.
[9] Fresew, B., Nigussie, D., Adamu, M. and Tamado, T. 2018b. Effect of split application of different N rates on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agriculture and Food Security, 7 (92), doi: 10.1186/s40066-018-0242-9.
[10] Fresew, B., Nigussie, D., Adamu, M. and Tamado, T. 2018a. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties on the Vertisols of central highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Security, 7 (78): 1-12.
[11] Cantarella. H., Otto, R., Soares, J. R. and Silva, A. G. 2018. Agronomic efficiency of NBPT as a urease inhibitor: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 13: 19-27.
[12] Minot, N., Warner, J., Lemma, S., Kasa, L., Gashaw, A. and Rashid, S. 2015. The Wheat Supply Chain in Ethiopia: Patterns, trends, and policy options. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[13] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2018. Agricultural Sample Survey 2017/18 (2010 E. C) volume I: Technical Report on Area and Production for Major Crops. Statistical Bulletin No. 584. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[14] Zenabu, B., Heluf, G. and Wassie, H. 2018. Characterization of Soil Fertility for Wheat Production at Shiebench District in Bench Maji Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Agriculture Resource and Technology: Open Access Journal, 15 (4): 1-9.
[15] Kidane, G. 2015. Dryland Agriculture Production Systems in Ethiopia. National Publishers, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[16] Fageria, N. K. 2014. Nitrogen harvest index and its association with crop yields. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37: 795–810.
[17] Tadesse, D. and Bobe, B. 2016. Effect of Drain Depth of Vertisols, Nitrogen Source and Time of Application on Yield and Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Ambo, Western Ethiopia. International Journals of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences, 2 (6): 1-9.
[18] Dewis, J. and Freitas, F. 1984. Physical and chemical methods of soil and water analysis. FAO Soil Bulletin No. 10. FAO, Rome. 275 pp.
[19] Walkley, A. and Black, C. A. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and the proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sciences. 37: 29-38.
[20] Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, C. S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. pp. 595-624. In: Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. (Eds.), Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd edition, American Society of Agronomy. Madison, WI 53711, USA.
[21] Polemio, M. and Rhoades, J. D. 1977. Determining cation exchange capacity: A new procedure for calcareous and gypsiferous soils. Soil Science Society America Journal. 41: 524-528.
[22] Rhoades, J. D. 1982. Cation Exchange Capacity. In: Methods of Soil analysis. pp. 149-157. In: Page A. L, Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. (Eds), Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph no. 9. 2nd Edition. Agronomy society America-Soil Science Society America, 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA.
[23] Bray, H. R. and Kurtz, L. T. 1945. Determination of organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science. 9: 39-46.
[24] Jones, J. B. and Case, V. W. 1990. Sampling, Handling, and Analysing Plant Tissue Samples. pp. 389-427. In: Westermann, R. L. (Ed). Soil Testing and Plant Analysis Book Series no. 3. Soil Science Society of America, Madison WI.
[25] Cleemput, O. V., Zapata, F. and Vanlauwe, B. 2008. Use of tracer technology in mineral fertilizer management. In: Guidelines on Nitrogen Management in Agricultural Systems. International Atomic Energy Agency, Austria, Vienna, pp. 19-126.
[26] Azizian, A. and Sepaskhah, A. R. 2014. Maize response to different water, salinity and nitrogen levels: Agronomic behavior. International Journal of Plant Production. 8: 107-130.
[27] SAS. 2012. SAS/STAT Software Syntax, Version 9.4. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. USA.
[28] Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H. and Dicky, D. A. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, Inc. Book Co., New York, pp: 352-358.
[29] Tekalign, T. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis: Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa.
[30] Jones, J. B. 2003. Agronomic Handbook: Management of Crops, Soils, and their Fertility. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 482pp.
[31] Marcelo, C., Espindula,, V. S. R., Moacil, A. de S., Marcela. C. and Guilherme, de S. P. 2013. Rates of urea with or without urease inhibitor for topdressing wheat. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 73 (2): 160-167.
[32] Yohannes, E. and Nigussie, D. 2019. Effect of Rates and Time of Nitrogen Application on Growth, Yield, and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Eastern Hararghe, Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 9 (11): 1-15.
[33] Sofonyas, D., Lemma, W. and Selamyihun, K. 2018. Response of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Application of Slow Releasing Nitrogen Fertilizer in Tigray Ethiop. Journal of Agricultural Science, 28 (1): 111-126.
[34] Serret, M. D., Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Pardo, A. and Araus, J. L. 2008. The effects of urea fertilization and genotype on yield, nitrogen use efficiency, 15N and 13C in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology. 153: 243–257.
[35] Beyenesh, Z., Nigussie, D. and Fetien, A. 2017. Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency of Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) as Influenced by Time and Rate of Nitrogen Application in Enderta, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Open Agriculture. 2: 611-624.
[36] Alamzeb, M., Anwar, S., Iqbal, A., Parmar, B. and Iqbal, M. 2017. Organic sources, nitrogen and tillage systems improve wheat productivity and profitability under semiarid climates. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. SP1: 73-78.
[37] Amanuel, G. and Tanner, D. G. 1991. The effect of crop rotation in two wheat production zones of southeastern Ethiopia. pp. 491-496. In: Saunders, D. (Ed.), Wheat for the Non-traditional Warm Areas (July 29-August 3 1990, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil), CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.
[38] Amsal, T. and Tanner, D. G. 2001. Effects of fertilizer application on N and P uptake, recovery and use efficiency of bread wheat grown on two soil types in central Ethiopia, Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources, 3 (2): 219-244.
[39] Genene, G. 2003. Yield and quality response of bread wheat varieties to rate and time of nitrogen fertilizer application at Kulumsa, southern Ethiopia, M. Sc Thesis, Alemaya University, Alemaya, Ethiopia. 120 pp.
[40] Dobermann A. R. 2005. Nitrogen Use Efficiency State of the Art. Agronomy and Horticulture Faculty Publication, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Paper. 316.
[41] Dressa, H., Nigussie, D. and Amsalu, A. 2012. Nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat: Effects of nitrogen rate and time of application. Journal Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 12 (3): 389-409.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tolcha Tufa, Tolera Abera, Tesfaye Midega, Adane Adugna, Hirpa Legesse, et al. (2020). Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Performance of Wheat Crop Through Application of Urea Stable and Conventional Urea in Vertisols of Ambo District. Plant, 8(3), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tolcha Tufa; Tolera Abera; Tesfaye Midega; Adane Adugna; Hirpa Legesse, et al. Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Performance of Wheat Crop Through Application of Urea Stable and Conventional Urea in Vertisols of Ambo District. Plant. 2020, 8(3), 72-79. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tolcha Tufa, Tolera Abera, Tesfaye Midega, Adane Adugna, Hirpa Legesse, et al. Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Performance of Wheat Crop Through Application of Urea Stable and Conventional Urea in Vertisols of Ambo District. Plant. 2020;8(3):72-79. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14,
      author = {Tolcha Tufa and Tolera Abera and Tesfaye Midega and Adane Adugna and Hirpa Legesse and Bezuayehu Tola},
      title = {Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Performance of Wheat Crop Through Application of Urea Stable and Conventional Urea in Vertisols of Ambo District},
      journal = {Plant},
      volume = {8},
      number = {3},
      pages = {72-79},
      doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20200803.14},
      abstract = {Nitrogen is the most yield liming nutrient that can be highly soluble and lost through leaching, volatilization and denitrification. In this view an experiment was conducted to determine the effects of urea stable and convectional urea on nitrogen use efficiency and crop performance of wheat in Vertisols of Ambo District, west Shewa Zone. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments were different rate of urea stable and convectional urea applied at planting and in split: (Control, 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting, 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting). Agronomic use efficiency was significantly varied among applied urea stable and convectional urea during first year. Significantly higher (32.77 and 40.8 kg grain/ kg N applied) agronomic efficiency of wheat from farm one (1) and two (2) were recorded by application of 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split form. Mean grain yield, dry biomass, harvest index, plant height and spike length of wheat were significantly affected with application of urea stable and convectional urea. The highest mean spike length (6.6cm), plant height (80cm), harvest index (45%) and thousand seed weight (45g) were recorded from split application of 69 kg N ha-1 in the form of urea stable fertilizer. Wheat grain yield of 3623 kg ha-1 and dry biomass 8921 kg ha-1 were recorded from split application of 69 kg N ha-1 from conventional urea fertilizer. Statistically significant difference of yield and yield components of wheat were not observed by applying similar rate of urea stable and convectional urea. Therefore, urea stable and convectional urea could be used as alternatively for wheat production in study area.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Performance of Wheat Crop Through Application of Urea Stable and Conventional Urea in Vertisols of Ambo District
    AU  - Tolcha Tufa
    AU  - Tolera Abera
    AU  - Tesfaye Midega
    AU  - Adane Adugna
    AU  - Hirpa Legesse
    AU  - Bezuayehu Tola
    Y1  - 2020/11/23
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14
    T2  - Plant
    JF  - Plant
    JO  - Plant
    SP  - 72
    EP  - 79
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0677
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20200803.14
    AB  - Nitrogen is the most yield liming nutrient that can be highly soluble and lost through leaching, volatilization and denitrification. In this view an experiment was conducted to determine the effects of urea stable and convectional urea on nitrogen use efficiency and crop performance of wheat in Vertisols of Ambo District, west Shewa Zone. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments were different rate of urea stable and convectional urea applied at planting and in split: (Control, 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting, 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting, 46 kg N ha-1 from urea in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea in split application, 69 kg N ha-1 from urea stable applied once at planting). Agronomic use efficiency was significantly varied among applied urea stable and convectional urea during first year. Significantly higher (32.77 and 40.8 kg grain/ kg N applied) agronomic efficiency of wheat from farm one (1) and two (2) were recorded by application of 23 kg N ha-1 from urea stable in split form. Mean grain yield, dry biomass, harvest index, plant height and spike length of wheat were significantly affected with application of urea stable and convectional urea. The highest mean spike length (6.6cm), plant height (80cm), harvest index (45%) and thousand seed weight (45g) were recorded from split application of 69 kg N ha-1 in the form of urea stable fertilizer. Wheat grain yield of 3623 kg ha-1 and dry biomass 8921 kg ha-1 were recorded from split application of 69 kg N ha-1 from conventional urea fertilizer. Statistically significant difference of yield and yield components of wheat were not observed by applying similar rate of urea stable and convectional urea. Therefore, urea stable and convectional urea could be used as alternatively for wheat production in study area.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Natural Resources Management Research Process, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Natural Resources Management Research Process, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Natural Resources Management Research Process, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Natural Resources Management Research Process, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Natural Resources Management Research Process, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Natural Resources Management Research Process, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections