Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, <i>Pyrenophora teres</i> in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia

Tekalign Zeleke

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia

Tekalign Zeleke

Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 1)

Received: 19 November 2016 Accepted: 6 December 2016 Published: 4 March 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The host reaction and yield performance of malt barley cultivars to net blotch, Pyrenophora teres disease was tested under natural infection of field at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) in Maher seasons of 2015. This study was designed to 12 commercial malt barley cultivars under field condition in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two replications. The significant differences in severity (%), Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC), grain yield (kg/ha), TKW (gm) and Days to Heading (DH) among the malt barley cultivars were observed. The HB-52 (4-68%), HB-1533 (12-54%) and Miscal-21 (4-68%) were scored the lowest ranges of severity index (%), where as IBON-174/03 (639.5%), HB-52 (611.4%) and HB-1533 (593.4%) were recorded the lowest means of AUDPC. The superior yield responses were obtained from HB-52 (1636kg/ha), Taveller (1647.5kg/ha), Miscal-21 (1775.5kg/ha) and Bekoji-1 (1752kg/ha) as compared to other cultivars. The disease severity % was gradually higher as the plant ages from seedling to maturity in all cultivars were tested to net blotch disease. Phonotypical scoring of net blotch on malt barley cultivar with yield performances were in to four categories; the yielder cultivar in the presence of net blotch disease pressure (Traveller, Bekoj-1 and Grace), both disease resistance and yielder cultivar (HB-52, Miscal-21), only net blotch resistance cultivar (HB-1533, IBON-174.03) and Cultivars (Beka, Sabini, Bahati, Fire Gebs and HB-120) were also identified as susceptibility to net blotch at natural infection in field with none yield advantage.

Published in	Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
Page(s)	43-47
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Net Blotch, AUDPC, Disease Severity, Host Reaction, Malt Barley, Cultivar

References

[1]	Adunga H. and Kemal A., 1986. A review of research on the control of insect pest of small cereal in Ethiopia. In Tsedeke Abate (ed.). A review of crop protection research in Ethiopia. Proceding of the first Ethiopia crop protection symposium, February 4-7, 1985. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp 57-75.
[2]	Agrios G. N., 2005. Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, London
[3]	Arabi M. I., Jawhar M., Al-Safadi B., MirAli N., 2004. Yield responses of barley to leaf stripe (Pyrenophora graminea) under experimental conditions in southern Syria. Journal of Phytopathology 152: 519-523.
[4]	Arabi M. I., Al-Safadi B. and Charbaji T., 2003. Pathogenic variation among isolates of Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch. J Phytopathol 151, 376–382.
[5]	Asenakech T. 2002. Relative importance and pathogenic variabilty of barley net and spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophorateres) in the northwest and central highlands of Ethiopia. M. Sc Thesis, Alemaya University. pp. 90.
[6]	Bekele H., Shambel K. and Abashamo L., 2001. Barley yield loss due to net blotch and leaf rust in Bale highlands. PestMgt. J. Eth. 5: 45-53.
[7]	Bekele H., 2005. Infection biology, epidemiology and resistance of barley land race lines to Pyrenophorateres. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Tropical Agriculture). Graduate School, Kasetsrat University, Thailand. pp. 156.
[8]	Campbell C. and Madden. L., 1990. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. John Wileey and Sons New York.
[9]	CSA (Central Statically Authority). 2014. Ethiopian Agricultural Sample enumerating. Report the preliminary result of area production and yield of temporary crops (Meher season, private peasant holding). Addis Ababa.
[10]	Eshetu B., 1985. Review of research on diseases on barley, tef and wheat in Ethiopia, pp 79-108. In A Tsedeke. (ed.). A review of crop protection research in Ethiopia, Proceedings of the first crop protection symposium 4-7. February, 1985, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[11]	Getachew L., Tolosa A. and Tesfaye Z., 2011. Unexploited opportunity in agro processing: the case of malt barley in Ethiopia. pp 339-350, inMulatu, B. and Grando, S. (eds). 2011. Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2^nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28-30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria. pp xiv + 39.
[12]	Gupta S., Loughman R., Platz G. J. and Lance R. C. M., 2003. Resistance in cultivated barleys to Pyrenophorateres f. teres and prospects of utilization in marker identification and breeding. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 54, 1379–1386.
[13]	HARC (Holetta Agricultural Research Center), 1998/2000. National Barley Progress Report.
[14]	Harrabi H., 1996. Breeding for resistance to the major fungal leaf pathogen of barley. In Symposium Régional sur les Maladies des Céréales et des Légumineuses Alimentaires ed. Ezzahiri, B., Lyamani, A., Raih, A. E. l. and Yamani, M. 11–14 Novembre, Rabat, Maroc, pp. 265–275.
[15]	Harrabi M. and Kamel A., 1990. Virulence spectrum to barley in some isolates of Pyrenophora teres from the Mediterranean region. Plant Dis 74, 230–232.
[16]	Horsley R. D. and Hochhalter M., 2004. Barley: agronomy. In: Wrigley, C., Corke, H. and Walker, C. E. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Grain Science. Vol. 1. Elsevier Academic Press. London. United Kingdom. pp. 38-46.
[17]	Jayasena K. W., van Burgel A., Tanaka K., Mejewski J. and Loughman R., 2007. Yield reduction in barley in relation to spot-type net blotch. Aust Plant Pathol 259, 429–433.
[18]	Jebbouj R. and El Yousfi B., 2010. An integrated multivariate approach to net blotch of barley: virulence quantification, pathotyping and a breeding strategy for disease resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol 127, 521–544.
[19]	Maaza K. and Lakech, 1996. Barley Utilization. In G, Hailu, J. vanLeur eds:, Past work and future prospects. Addis Ababa, EIAR/ICARDA. PP 167-170.
[20]	McDonald B. A. and Linde C., 2002. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 349–349.
[21]	SAS Institute, 2002. SAS user’s guide: Statistics Version 9. SAS Institute, Cary, New York.
[22]	Serenius M., 2006. Population Structure of Pyrenophora teres, the Causal Agent of Net Blotch of Barley, PhD Thesis. Finland: MTT Agrifood Research Finland.
[23]	Silvar C., Casas A. M., Kopahnke D., Habekub A., Schweizer G., Gracia M. P., Lasa J. M., Ciudad F. J., et al., 2009. Screening the Spanish Barley Core Collection for disease resistance. Plant Breed 129, 45–52.
[24]	Steffenson B. J., 1988. Investigation on Pyrenophorateresf. terres, the cause of the net blotch of barley; pathotypes, host resistance, yield loss, and comparable epidemiology to Rhynchosporiumsacalls by time series analysis. Ph.D Dissertation University of California, Davis, 221 pp.
[25]	Stewart R. B. and Y. Dagnachew., 1967. Index of plant disease in Ethiopia. Pp 67. College of agric. H. S. I. U. Expt. Bull. NO. 30.
[26]	Tekauz A., 1986. Effect of plant age and leaf position of barley to Pyrenophorateres. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 8, 380–386.
[27]	Tekauz A., 2000. Evaluation of barley cultivar resistance to Pyrenophorateres using combined seedling and adult-plant reactions. In: Proceedings of the 8^th International Barley Genetics Symposium, Vol II: Adelaide, pp. 182–183.
[28]	Teshome G., Chemeda F., Geremew B., 2008. Effects of Net Blotch (Pyrenophorateres) on Malt Barley Yield and Grain Quality at Holeta Central Ethiopia. East Africa Journal of Science. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 150-158.
[29]	Yitbarek S., Bekele H., Getaneh W. and Dereje T., 1996. Disease surveys and loss assessment studies on barley, pp 105-115. In HailuGebre and Joop van Leur (eds.). Barley Research in Ethiopia. Past work and future prospects. Proceedings of the First Barley Review Work Shop, 16-19 October 1993, Addis Ababa: IAR/ICARDA
[30]	Zemede A., 2002. The brley ofEethiopia. Pp 77-107. In Stephen, B. B (ed). Genes in the field. On-farm conservation of crop diversity. Lewis publisher, Boca Ra ton. Plant protection, 28 (2): 147-154.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tekalign Zeleke. (2017). Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tekalign Zeleke. Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 5(1), 43-47. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tekalign Zeleke. Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. J Plant Sci. 2017;5(1):43-47. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16,
  author = {Tekalign Zeleke},
  title = {Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia},
  journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {43-47},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20170501.16},
  abstract = {The host reaction and yield performance of malt barley cultivars to net blotch, Pyrenophora teres disease was tested under natural infection of field at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) in Maher seasons of 2015. This study was designed to 12 commercial malt barley cultivars under field condition in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two replications. The significant differences in severity (%), Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC), grain yield (kg/ha), TKW (gm) and Days to Heading (DH) among the malt barley cultivars were observed. The HB-52 (4-68%), HB-1533 (12-54%) and Miscal-21 (4-68%) were scored the lowest ranges of severity index (%), where as IBON-174/03 (639.5%), HB-52 (611.4%) and HB-1533 (593.4%) were recorded the lowest means of AUDPC. The superior yield responses were obtained from HB-52 (1636kg/ha), Taveller (1647.5kg/ha), Miscal-21 (1775.5kg/ha) and Bekoji-1 (1752kg/ha) as compared to other cultivars. The disease severity % was gradually higher as the plant ages from seedling to maturity in all cultivars were tested to net blotch disease. Phonotypical scoring of net blotch on malt barley cultivar with yield performances were in to four categories; the yielder cultivar in the presence of net blotch disease pressure (Traveller, Bekoj-1 and Grace), both disease resistance and yielder cultivar (HB-52, Miscal-21), only net blotch resistance cultivar (HB-1533, IBON-174.03) and Cultivars (Beka, Sabini, Bahati, Fire Gebs and HB-120) were also identified as susceptibility to net blotch at natural infection in field with none yield advantage.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia
AU  - Tekalign Zeleke
Y1  - 2017/03/04
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
SP  - 43
EP  - 47
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0731
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
AB  - The host reaction and yield performance of malt barley cultivars to net blotch, Pyrenophora teres disease was tested under natural infection of field at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) in Maher seasons of 2015. This study was designed to 12 commercial malt barley cultivars under field condition in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two replications. The significant differences in severity (%), Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC), grain yield (kg/ha), TKW (gm) and Days to Heading (DH) among the malt barley cultivars were observed. The HB-52 (4-68%), HB-1533 (12-54%) and Miscal-21 (4-68%) were scored the lowest ranges of severity index (%), where as IBON-174/03 (639.5%), HB-52 (611.4%) and HB-1533 (593.4%) were recorded the lowest means of AUDPC. The superior yield responses were obtained from HB-52 (1636kg/ha), Taveller (1647.5kg/ha), Miscal-21 (1775.5kg/ha) and Bekoji-1 (1752kg/ha) as compared to other cultivars. The disease severity % was gradually higher as the plant ages from seedling to maturity in all cultivars were tested to net blotch disease. Phonotypical scoring of net blotch on malt barley cultivar with yield performances were in to four categories; the yielder cultivar in the presence of net blotch disease pressure (Traveller, Bekoj-1 and Grace), both disease resistance and yielder cultivar (HB-52, Miscal-21), only net blotch resistance cultivar (HB-1533, IBON-174.03) and Cultivars (Beka, Sabini, Bahati, Fire Gebs and HB-120) were also identified as susceptibility to net blotch at natural infection in field with none yield advantage.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tekalign Zeleke

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Sinana Agricultural Research Centre, Bale-Robe, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tekalign Zeleke. (2017). Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tekalign Zeleke. Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 5(1), 43-47. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tekalign Zeleke. Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. J Plant Sci. 2017;5(1):43-47. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16,
  author = {Tekalign Zeleke},
  title = {Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia},
  journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {43-47},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20170501.16},
  abstract = {The host reaction and yield performance of malt barley cultivars to net blotch, Pyrenophora teres disease was tested under natural infection of field at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) in Maher seasons of 2015. This study was designed to 12 commercial malt barley cultivars under field condition in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two replications. The significant differences in severity (%), Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC), grain yield (kg/ha), TKW (gm) and Days to Heading (DH) among the malt barley cultivars were observed. The HB-52 (4-68%), HB-1533 (12-54%) and Miscal-21 (4-68%) were scored the lowest ranges of severity index (%), where as IBON-174/03 (639.5%), HB-52 (611.4%) and HB-1533 (593.4%) were recorded the lowest means of AUDPC. The superior yield responses were obtained from HB-52 (1636kg/ha), Taveller (1647.5kg/ha), Miscal-21 (1775.5kg/ha) and Bekoji-1 (1752kg/ha) as compared to other cultivars. The disease severity % was gradually higher as the plant ages from seedling to maturity in all cultivars were tested to net blotch disease. Phonotypical scoring of net blotch on malt barley cultivar with yield performances were in to four categories; the yielder cultivar in the presence of net blotch disease pressure (Traveller, Bekoj-1 and Grace), both disease resistance and yielder cultivar (HB-52, Miscal-21), only net blotch resistance cultivar (HB-1533, IBON-174.03) and Cultivars (Beka, Sabini, Bahati, Fire Gebs and HB-120) were also identified as susceptibility to net blotch at natural infection in field with none yield advantage.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Host Reaction and Yield Performance of Malt Barley Cultivars to Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia
AU  - Tekalign Zeleke
Y1  - 2017/03/04
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
SP  - 43
EP  - 47
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0731
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.16
AB  - The host reaction and yield performance of malt barley cultivars to net blotch, Pyrenophora teres disease was tested under natural infection of field at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) in Maher seasons of 2015. This study was designed to 12 commercial malt barley cultivars under field condition in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two replications. The significant differences in severity (%), Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC), grain yield (kg/ha), TKW (gm) and Days to Heading (DH) among the malt barley cultivars were observed. The HB-52 (4-68%), HB-1533 (12-54%) and Miscal-21 (4-68%) were scored the lowest ranges of severity index (%), where as IBON-174/03 (639.5%), HB-52 (611.4%) and HB-1533 (593.4%) were recorded the lowest means of AUDPC. The superior yield responses were obtained from HB-52 (1636kg/ha), Taveller (1647.5kg/ha), Miscal-21 (1775.5kg/ha) and Bekoji-1 (1752kg/ha) as compared to other cultivars. The disease severity % was gradually higher as the plant ages from seedling to maturity in all cultivars were tested to net blotch disease. Phonotypical scoring of net blotch on malt barley cultivar with yield performances were in to four categories; the yielder cultivar in the presence of net blotch disease pressure (Traveller, Bekoj-1 and Grace), both disease resistance and yielder cultivar (HB-52, Miscal-21), only net blotch resistance cultivar (HB-1533, IBON-174.03) and Cultivars (Beka, Sabini, Bahati, Fire Gebs and HB-120) were also identified as susceptibility to net blotch at natural infection in field with none yield advantage.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download