Journal of Plant Sciences
Volume 7, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages: 21-26
Received: Jan. 19, 2019;
Accepted: Mar. 4, 2019;
Published: Mar. 25, 2019
Views 308 Downloads 71
Andrew Abiodun Efisue, Department of Crop & Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
Ella Elizabeth Igoma, Department of Crop & Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
Background and Objective: The coastal region of Niger Delta of Nigeria is favourable for rice production because of the swampy nature, but rice productivity is very low due high level of salinity in the soil. The objectives of this study was to identify promising salt tolerant genotypes for the deployment into this salt stressed region and also for population improvement for salt breeding programme. Materials and Methods: Two potted experiments comprise the same twenty genotypes were established concurrently in coastal soil and controlled sterilized top soil in two replications in a randomized complete block design at the University of Port Harcourt teaching and research farm. Results: Most of the genotypes showed differential response to salinity stress, the protocol used for the screening could be effective as significant difference was observed based on t-test for the two experiments. Salinity scores showed significan negetative association with number of tillers and leaf area index (LAI). Principal component 1 contributed 44.21% and 38.44% of the total variation in the control and coastal soil experiments, respectively. Conclusion: Genotypes IR 84105-5-B-1-B-3 and IR 84105-5-B-1-B-2 maybe promising for deployment into this salinity stressed region. The leave area index and tillering ability of the rice crop are major yield components, their high weight and factor loading values indicate that they are purtative traits for salinity tolerant, which could be used for population development in salinity breeding programme.
Andrew Abiodun Efisue,
Ella Elizabeth Igoma,
Screening Oryza Sativa L. for Salinity Tolerance During Vegetative Stage for the Coastal Region of Niger-Delta Nigeria, Journal of Plant Sciences.
Vol. 7, No. 1,
2019, pp. 21-26.
Agricultural Transformation Agenda (ATA)(2012). Rice Value Chain report, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD), Nigeria.
Maas, E. V and Hoffman GJ (1997) Crop salt tolerancecurrent assessment. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 103, 115–134.
Mori, I. and T. Kinoshita .1987. Salt tolerance of rice callus clones. Rice Genet. Newsl. 4:112-113.
Kumar, K. , M. Kumar, S. R. Kim, H. Ryu, Y. G. Cho, Insights into genomics of salt stress response in rice, Rice 6 (2013) 27.
Efisue, A. A., Tongoona, P., Derera, J, & Ubi, B. E. (2009). Screening early generation progenies of interspecific rice genotypes for drought stress tolerance at vegetative phase. Journal of Crop Improvement 23(2): 174-1993.
Jampeetong, A. and H. Brix, 2009. Effects of NaC salinity on growth, morphology, photosynthesis and proline accumulation of Salvinia natans. Aquat. Bot., 91: 181-186.
Munns, R. and M. Tester, 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 59: 651-681.
Moradi, F. and A. M. Ismail, 2007. Responses of photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and ROSscavenging systems to salt stress during seedling and reproductive stages in rice. Ann. Bot., 99: 1161-1173.
Zeng, L., Shannon, M. C., Lesch, S. M. 2001. Timing of salinity stress affects rice growth and yield components. Agricultural Water Management 48: 191-206.
Nishimura, T., S. Cha-um, M. Takagaki and K. Ohyama, 2011. Survival percentage, photosynthetic abilities and growth characters of two indica rice (Oryza sativa L. spp. indica) cultivars in response to isosmotic stress. Span. J. Agric. Res., 9: 262-270.
Gregorio, G. B. , D. Senadhira, R. D. Mendoza, Screening rice for salinity tolerance, IRRI Discussion Paper Series no. 22, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines 1997, pp. 1–30.
Andrew A. Efisue , Bianca C. Umunna , and Joseph A. Orluchukwu (2014). Effects of yield components on yield potential of some lowland rice (Oyza sativa L.) in coastal region of southern Nigeria. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci.6(9): 119 – 127.
Flowers, T. J. and S. A. Flowers, 2005. Why does salinity pose such a difficult problem for plant breeders? Agr. Water Manage., 78: 15-24.
Zhong Hai Ren, Ji-Ping Gao, Le-Gong Li, Xiu-Ling Cai, Wei Huang, Dai-Yin Chao, Mei-Zhen Zhu, Zong-Yang Wang, Sheng Luan and Hong-Xuan Lin. 2005. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nature Genetics 37: 1141 – 1146.
Devitt D., Jarreli W. M. and Stevens K. L., 1981. SodiumPotassium ratios in soil solution and plant response under saline conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 80-86.
Epstein, E. 1980. Response of plants to saline environment. In : (Eds.) Rains, P. W., R. C.
Sankar P. D,. Arabi Mohamed Saleh M. A and C. Immanuel Selvaraj (2011). Rice breeding for salt tolerance, Research in Biotechnology, 2(2): 1-10.
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). 1996. Standard evaluation system for rice. Los Baanos, Philippines: IRRI.
Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. pp 269.
SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Emoghene, Achinike, Elsie Ihuakwu Hamadina and Andrew Efisue (2015). Response of Hybrid Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivar FARO44 to Salinity in Coastal Plain Sands of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Plant Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 2, 2015, pp. 106-110.doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.20.
Eynard, A., R. Lal and K. Wiebe, 2005. Crop response in salt-affected soils. J. Sustain. Agric., 27: 5-50.
Peng, S., G. S. Khush and K. G. Cassman, 1994. Evolution of the new plant ideotype for increased yield potential. Proceedings of a Workshop on Rice Yield Potential in Favorable Environments, November 29-December 4, 1993, International Rice Research Institute.
Iezzoni A. F., and Pritts M. P. (1991). Applications of Principal Component Analysis to Horticultural Research. Hortscience, Vol. 26(4) pp 334 – 338.