Performance of Cassava (Manihot esculanta. Crantz) Varieties at Different Areas of South Omo, Southern Ethiopia
Journal of Plant Sciences
Volume 8, Issue 3, June 2020, Pages: 67-70
Received: Jun. 2, 2020; Accepted: Jun. 24, 2020; Published: Jul. 28, 2020
Views 27      Downloads 18
Mohammed Awel, Jinka Agricultural Research Center Department of Crop Science Research Case Team, Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Jinka, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
A field experiment involving four improved cassava (manihot esculanta, crantz) varieties and one local check was carried out at four different locations of South Omo zone (Kurea, Jinka on station, Geza and Shepi Kebelles) during the 2018 to 2019 cropping seasons under rain fed conditions to identify the best performing variety/ies to the target areas of South Omo zone. The cassava varieties included in the field experiment were four improved (Kelo, Qulle, Hawassa-04, Chancho) and a local check. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Growth, yield and yield components were studied. The result showed that plant height was significantly affected by variety while number of primary and secondary branch was not significantly influenced by variety. Total root number per plant, tuber weight and total yield per hectare also showed a significance difference among varieties. The highest total root yield per hectare (24.77 t/ha) was recorded from Hawassa-04 where as Chancho, Kelo, Qule and local check show no significance difference among each other. Therefore, it can be concluded that use of the improved cassava varieties such as Hawassa-04 is advisable and could be appropriate for cassava production in the test area even though further testing is required to put the recommendation on a strong basis.
Root Yield, Growth Parameters, Cassava Variety, Yield Components
To cite this article
Mohammed Awel, Performance of Cassava (Manihot esculanta. Crantz) Varieties at Different Areas of South Omo, Southern Ethiopia, Journal of Plant Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 3, 2020, pp. 67-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20200803.13
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Save and Grow: Cassava, A guide to sustainable production and intensification. Rome (2013).
Droppelmann K., et al. “Cassava, the 21st century crop for smallholders? Exploring innovations along the livelihood value chain nexus in Malawi”. Centre for Rural Development (SLE) Berlin, SLE Publication Series (2018): S 274.
Allem, A. C. 2002. “The origins and taxonomy of cassava”. In R. J. Hillocks, J. M. Thresh & A. C. Bellotti, eds. Cassava: Biology, production and utilization Wallingford, UK, CAB International. 1-16.
Nassar NMA. “Conservation of the genetic resources of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): determination of wild species location with emphasis on probable origin”. Economic Botany 32.3 (1978): 311-320.
Nassar N. M. A., & Ortiz, R. (2007). Cassava improvement: challenges and Impacts. Journal Agricultural Science, 145, 163-171.
Nkweke, F. I., Spencer, D. S. C., & Lynam, J. K. (2002). The Cassava Transformation: Africa’s Best-kept Secret. East Lansing, USA: Michigan State University Press.
Hershey, C. (2010). Cassava breeding: theory and practice. A publication by Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), In Press.
Tesfaye T., Atnafua B., Engida T., Getachew W., Tewodros M., Wubshet B. and Mesele G. (2016). Performance of cassva (Manihot esculenta crantz) clones in potential and low moisture stressed areas of Ethiopia.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Statistical Database, Statistical Division. Rome (2019).
Tesfaye T, Getahun D, Ermias S, Shiferaw M, Temesgene A, Birhanu Y (2013). Current status, Potentials and challenges of Cassava production, processing, marketing and utilization: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. Greener J. Agric. Sci. 3 (4): 262-270.
SNNPR BoA (Southern Nationalities and Peoples Region, Bureau of Agriculture) (2014). Basic Agricultural Information Planning and programming Service, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Unpublished row data.
Anshebo T, Tofu, Tsegaye E, Kifle A, Dagne Y (2004). New cassava varieties for tropical semi arid climate of Ethiopia. In: A proceedings of the 9th ISTRC-AB symposium 2004 Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 526-530.
SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis Systems SAS/STAT user’s guide Version 9.0 Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc. USA.
Ntawuruhunga P, Dixon A (2010). Quantitative variation and interrelationship between factors influencing cassava yield. J. Appl. Biosci. 26: 594-1602.
Kenneth VAR (2011). Evaluation of three cassava varieties for tuber quality and yield. Gladstone road Agricultural Centre Crop Research Report 4: 12.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186