Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila

Suhasini L. Kudupali; Shivanna N.

doi:doi:10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila

Suhasini L. Kudupali, Shivanna N.

Published in American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 1, Issue 1)

Received: 26 December 2012 Accepted: Published: 20 February 2013

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The fitness parameter has been studied in Drosophila melanogaster, D. bipectinata，D. malerkotliana and D. ananassae. 7 day aged virgin flies were used for mating experiment, it revealed that, mating latency is more in D. malerkotliana and less in D. melanogaster. Mating time of D. melanogaster is more and it is less in D. ananassae D. bipectinata takes more time to remate and D. melanogaster takes less time to remate. Mating time, fecundity, productivity and viability of virgin is more than mated male in all the species except, D. melanogaster. Even though D. melanogaster has more percentage of viability it takes more time in mating. The mating time is less in D. ananassae whereas, fecundity, productivity and percentage of viability is more than other species.

Published in	American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
Page(s)	1-6
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Drosophila, Fitness Parameters, Mating Time, Fecundity, Productivity

References

[1]	A. J. Bateman, "Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila". Heredity, vol. 2, pp. 349-368. 1948.
[2]	R. L. Trivers, "Parental investment and Sexual Selection" .In: Campbell. B. (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. pp.136- 179. 1972.
[3]	M. Andersson, "Sexual selection. Princeton", NJ: princeton University Press. 1994.
[4]	S. R. Singh, B. N. Singh and H. F. Hoenigsberg, "Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila". Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 1(3), pp. 178-215. 2002.
[5]	S. R. Singh and B. N. Singh, "Female remating in Drosophila: comparison of duration of copulation between first and second mating in six species". Current Scince, vol. 86(3) pp. 465-470. 2004.
[6]	S. Pavkovic-lucic and V. Kekic, "Influence of mating Experience on mating latency and copulation duration in Drosophila melanogaster females". Russian Journal of Genetics, vol. 45(7) pp. 875–877. 2009.
[7]	E. B. Spiess, "Mating Propensity and Its Genetic Basis in Drosophila, Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, Hecht, M. K. and Sreere, W .C ., Eds., Amsterdam". pp. 315-379. 1970.
[8]	S. R. Singh and B. N. Singh, "Male remating in Drosophila ananassae: Evidence for interstrain variation in remating time and shorter duration of copulation during second mating". Zoological Science, vol.17, pp. 389-393. 2000.
[9]	L. Partridge, K. Flower, S, Trevitt and W. Sharp, "An examination of the effects of males on the survival and egg- production rates of Drosophila melanogaster". J. Insect Physiol. vol.32, pp. 925-929. 1986.
[10]	R. Bonduriansky, "The evolution of male mate choice in insect: a synthesis of ideas and evidence". Biological reviews of the cambridge philosophical society. vol 76, pp. 305-339. 2001.
[11]	C. Gillott, "Male accessory gland secretions: Modulators of Female Reproductive Physiology and Behavior". Annu. Rev. Entomol. vol. 48, pp.163-184. 2003.
[12]	S. Roopashree, K. Ravi Ram, and S. R. Ramesh, "Genotype environment interaction and fecundity in Drosophila". Drosophila information service. vol. 84, pp. 93-95. 2001.
[13]	M. S. Krishna, and S. N. Hegde, "Reproductive success of large and small flies in Drosophila bipectinata complex". Curr. Sci. vol. 72, pp.742- 750. 1997.
[14]	D. D. Sameoto and R. S. Miller, "Factors controlling the productivity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. Simulans". Ecology. vol. 47, pp. 695-704. 1966.
[15]	R. B. Hiremani and N. Shivanna, "Accessory gland secretory proteins in relation to fitness parameters of Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila varians". Entomological research, vol. 40, pp. 251- 258. 2010.
[16]	M. E. Turner and W. A. Anderson, "Multiple mating and female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster". Evolution, vol. 37, pp. 714-723. 1983.
[17]	D. E. L. Promislow, C. F. Jung and M. L. Arnold, "Age-specific fitness components in hybrid female of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis", The American Genetic Association, vol. 92, pp. 30-37. 2001.
[18]	G. Ribo, J. Ocana, and A. Prevosti, "Effect of larval crowding on adult mating behaviour in D. melanogaster". Heredity. vol. 63, pp. 195-202. 1989.
[19]	S. Koref- Santibanez, "Effects of age and experience on mating activity in the sibling species Drosophila pavani and Drosophila gaucha". Behavior Genetics, vol. 31, pp.287-297. 2001.
[20]	L. Levine, M. Asmussen, O. Olvera, J. R. Powell, M. E. Delarosa, V. M. Salceeda, M. I. Gaso, J. Gujman, and W. W. Anderson, "Population genetics of Mexican Drosophila. V. A. high rate of multiple inseminations in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura". Am. Nat. vol. 116, pp. 493-503. 1980.
[21]	L. Partridge, and M. Farquhar, "Sexual activity reduces lifespan of male fruit flies". Nature, vol. 294, pp. 580-582. 1981.
[22]	K. P. Nicholas, F. G. Laura and A. Deborah, Roach. "Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster". The American naturalist, vol. 171, pp. 10-21. 2008.
[23]	T. A. Markow, M. Quaid, S. Kerr, "Male mating experience and competitive courtship success in D. melanogaster". Nature. vol. 276, pp.821-822. 1978.
[24]	N. Shivanna, G. S. Siddalingamurthy, and S. R. Ramesh, "Larval pupation site preference and its relationship to the glue proteins in a few species of Drosophila". Genome, vol. 39, pp. 105-111. 1996.
[25]	Y. Fuyama, "Genetic evidence that ovulation reduces sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females". Behaviour Genetics, vol. 25, pp. 581-587. 1995.
[26]	U. Tram, and M. F. Wolfner, "Seminal fluid regulation of female sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster". Proceedings of National Academy Science, vol. 95, pp. 4051-4054. 1998.
[27]	D. A. Gailey, F. R. Jackson, and R. Siegel, "Male courtship in Drosophila: The Conditioned response to immature males and its genetic control". Genetics, vol. 102, pp. 771-782. 1982.
[28]	S. P. McRobert and L. Tompkins, "Two consequences of homosexual courtship performed by Drosophila affinis males". Evolution, vol. 42, pp. 1093-1097. 1988.
[29]	M. A. F. Noor, "Environmental effects on male courtship intensity in Drosophila pseudoobscura (Diptera:Drosophila)". Journal of Insect behaviour, vol.10, pp. 305-312. 1997.
[30]	M. Prathibha and M. S. Krishna, "Greater mating success of middle- agd females of D. ananassae". Zoological Studies, vol. 49(6), pp. 806-815. 2010.
[31]	M. Nazari and S.N. Hegde, "Effect of fluoxetine on the courtship latency, mating latency and copulation duration of Drosophila melanogaster". J.Postgrade. Med. Inst. vol. 20, pp. 58-63. 2006.
[32]	S. Pavkovic-lucic and V. Kekic, "Is body size a sexually- selected trait in Drosophila hydei males?". Archives of Biological sciences, vol. 59, pp. 21-22. 2007.
[33]	A. Hoikkala, and P. Welbergen, "Signal and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtship in three Hawaiian lek mating Drosophila species". Anim. Behav. vol. 50, pp. 177-190. 1995.
[34]	A. Hoikkala, S. Crossley and C. Castillo-Melendez. "Copulatory courtship in Drosophila birchii and Drosophila serrata, species recognition and sexual selection". J. Insect Behav. vol.13, pp. 361-373. 2000.
[35]	A. S. Gilchrist, and L. Partridge, "Why it is difficult to model sperm displacement in Drosophila melanogaster: The relation between sperm transfer and copulation duration". Evolution. vol. 54, pp. 534-542. 2000.
[36]	Kazuhiko-Kosuda. "The aging effect on male mating activity in Drosophila melanogaster". Behavior genetics, vol. 15(3), pp. 297-303. 1985.
[37]	E. L. Cruz, A. M. Therese and Peter Yaeger. "Relative male age, fertility, and competitive mating success in Drosophila melanogaster". Behavior genetics. vol. 10(2), pp. 163-170. 1980.
[38]	J. Grossfield, and R. F. Rockwell. "Courtship behaviour of endemic Australian Drosophila. Scaoptodrosophila - the lativitata and fumida groups". Am. Midl. Natur. vol. 101, pp. 257- 268. 1979.
[39]	H. Spieth. "Mating behavior with the genus Drosophila". Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. vol. 99, pp. 401-474. 1952.
[40]	S. Pitnick. "Male size influences mate fecundity and remating interval in Drosophila melanogaster". Animal Behaviour. vol. 41(5), pp.735-745. 1991.
[41]	A. Lefranc, and J. Bundgaard. "The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster". Hereditas. vol. 132, pp. 243-247. 2001.
[42]	V. N. Novoseltsev, J. A. Novoseltseva and A. I. Yashin, "What does a fly’s individual fecundity pattern look like? The dynamics of resource allocation in reproduction and ageing". Mech. Age. Develop. vol.124, pp. 605 – 617. 2003.
[43]	O. Stromnaes and I. Kvelland. "Sexual activity of Drosophila melanogaster males", Hereditas. vol. 48 pp. 442-470. 1962.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Suhasini L. Kudupali, Shivanna N. (2013). Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Suhasini L. Kudupali; Shivanna N. Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila. Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2013, 1(1), 1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Suhasini L. Kudupali, Shivanna N. Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila. Am J BioSci Bioeng. 2013;1(1):1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11,
  author = {Suhasini L. Kudupali and Shivanna N.},
  title = {Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila},
  journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-6},
  doi = {10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.20130101.11},
  abstract = {The fitness parameter has been studied in Drosophila melanogaster, D. bipectinata，D. malerkotliana and D. ananassae. 7 day aged virgin flies were used for mating experiment, it revealed that, mating latency is more in D. malerkotliana and less in D. melanogaster. Mating time of D. melanogaster is more and it is less in D. ananassae  D. bipectinata takes more time to remate and D. melanogaster takes less time to remate. Mating time, fecundity, productivity and viability of virgin is more than mated male in all the species except, D. melanogaster. Even though D. melanogaster has more percentage of viability it takes more time in mating. The mating time is less in D. ananassae whereas, fecundity, productivity and percentage of viability is more than other species.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila
AU  - Suhasini L. Kudupali
AU  - Shivanna N.
Y1  - 2013/02/20
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
T2  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
JF  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
JO  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
SP  - 1
EP  - 6
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5893
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
AB  - The fitness parameter has been studied in Drosophila melanogaster, D. bipectinata，D. malerkotliana and D. ananassae. 7 day aged virgin flies were used for mating experiment, it revealed that, mating latency is more in D. malerkotliana and less in D. melanogaster. Mating time of D. melanogaster is more and it is less in D. ananassae  D. bipectinata takes more time to remate and D. melanogaster takes less time to remate. Mating time, fecundity, productivity and viability of virgin is more than mated male in all the species except, D. melanogaster. Even though D. melanogaster has more percentage of viability it takes more time in mating. The mating time is less in D. ananassae whereas, fecundity, productivity and percentage of viability is more than other species.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Suhasini L. Kudupali

Department of Zoology. Karnatak University, Dharwad, INDIA
Shivanna N.

Department of Applied Genetics, Karnatak University, Dharwad, INDIA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Suhasini L. Kudupali, Shivanna N. (2013). Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Suhasini L. Kudupali; Shivanna N. Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila. Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2013, 1(1), 1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Suhasini L. Kudupali, Shivanna N. Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila. Am J BioSci Bioeng. 2013;1(1):1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11,
  author = {Suhasini L. Kudupali and Shivanna N.},
  title = {Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila},
  journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-6},
  doi = {10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.20130101.11},
  abstract = {The fitness parameter has been studied in Drosophila melanogaster, D. bipectinata，D. malerkotliana and D. ananassae. 7 day aged virgin flies were used for mating experiment, it revealed that, mating latency is more in D. malerkotliana and less in D. melanogaster. Mating time of D. melanogaster is more and it is less in D. ananassae  D. bipectinata takes more time to remate and D. melanogaster takes less time to remate. Mating time, fecundity, productivity and viability of virgin is more than mated male in all the species except, D. melanogaster. Even though D. melanogaster has more percentage of viability it takes more time in mating. The mating time is less in D. ananassae whereas, fecundity, productivity and percentage of viability is more than other species.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Fitness Parameters in Different Species of Drosophila
AU  - Suhasini L. Kudupali
AU  - Shivanna N.
Y1  - 2013/02/20
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
T2  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
JF  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
JO  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
SP  - 1
EP  - 6
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5893
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20130101.11
AB  - The fitness parameter has been studied in Drosophila melanogaster, D. bipectinata，D. malerkotliana and D. ananassae. 7 day aged virgin flies were used for mating experiment, it revealed that, mating latency is more in D. malerkotliana and less in D. melanogaster. Mating time of D. melanogaster is more and it is less in D. ananassae  D. bipectinata takes more time to remate and D. melanogaster takes less time to remate. Mating time, fecundity, productivity and viability of virgin is more than mated male in all the species except, D. melanogaster. Even though D. melanogaster has more percentage of viability it takes more time in mating. The mating time is less in D. ananassae whereas, fecundity, productivity and percentage of viability is more than other species.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download