Male mating a second female after first mate (male remating) is a common feature in Drosophila, particularly in mass culture. On the other hand, female remating is not as frequent as that of male remating because the sperms introduced along with the semen into the spermatheca are stored there. However, the phenomena of female remating have been reported in few species. During sexual activity, the males and females are involved an elaborate courtship at the end of which the male mounts on to the female followed by mating. During each mating, the mounted male through its ejaculate, transmits the sperms into the females' genital tract where it is stored. The sperms are stored in the spermatheca. Usually, with one mount maximum sperms are transferred to female hence second mounting does not occur. In most Drosophila, when a male mounts a female after an elaborate courtship, the pairs remain in cupola for a fixed period then dismounts. No more courtship or mounting is performed by the male towards the same female. In D.jambulina, D.nagarholensis and D.gangotrii remounting occurs two or three times immediately after the first mount. The reason for remounting has been analyzed in the present study through measuring the width of the female reproductive tract and sperm count after each mount. The female reproductive tract was dissected out and width of uterus was measured. The result showed significant difference in the width after each mount. The sperm count of these species after each mount also showed significant variation. Remounting perhaps enhances the fitness of the mating pairs.
| DOI | 10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11 |
| Published in | American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 2, Issue 3, June 2014) |
| Page(s) | 37-43 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Width of Uterus, Sperm Count, Male Remounting, Montium Subgroup
| [1] | Bernasconi, G. and Keller, L, “Female polyandry affects their son’s reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum”. J. Evol. Biol, 14: 186-193. 2001 |
| [2] | Hoenigsberg, H. F, “Sexual behavior” a discussion. Evolution. 14. 527-528. 1960 |
| [3] | Singh, S.R. and Singh, B. N, “Male remating in Drosophila ananassae. Evidence for inter – strain variation in remating time and shorter duration of copulation during second mating”. Zool. SEI. 17: 389-393. 2000. |
| [4] | Bastock, M, “A gene mutation that changes a behaviour pattern”. Evolution. 10. 421-439. 1956. |
| [5] | Petit, C., Bourgeron, P. and Mercot, H, “Multiple matings, effective population size and sexual selection in D. melanogaster”. Heredity, 45. 281-292. 1980. |
| [6] | Reynolds, J. D. and Gross, M. R, “Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulate”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 250. 57–62. 1992. |
| [7] | Tregenza, T. and Wedell, N, “Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus”. Evolution, 52. 1726–1730. 1998. |
| [8] | Newcomer, S. D., Zeh, J. A. and Zeh, D. W. “Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 96. 10236–10241. 1999. |
| [9] | Evans, J. P., and Magurran, A. E, “Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 97. 10074–10076. 2000. |
| [10] | Konior, M., Radwan, J. and Kolodziejczyk, M, “Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite”. Evolution. 55. 1893–1896. 2001. |
| [11] | Tregenza, T., Wedell, N., Hosken, D. J. and Ward, P. I, “Maternal effects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in yellow dung flies”. Evolution. 57. 297–304. 2003. |
| [12] | Schmoll, T., Dietrich, V., Winkel, W., Epplen, J. T., Schurr, F. and Lubjuhn, T, “Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extra pair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine”. Evolution. 59. 645–657. 2005. |
| [13] | Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. F., Wolfner, M. F. and Partridge, L, “Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products”. Nature. 373. 241–244. 1995. |
| [14] | Wolfner, M. F. “The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila”. Heredity. 88. 85–93. 2002. |
| [15] | Ram, K. R., Ji, S. and Wolfner, M. F, “Fates and targets of male accessory gland proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster”. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 35. 1059–1071. 2005. |
| [16] | Priest, N. K., Roach, D. A. and Galloway, L. F, “Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid”. Biology Letters, forthcoming, doi:10.1098/rsbl.0473. 2007. |
| [17] | Wheeler, M. R, “The insemination reaction in intraspecific mating of Drosophila”. Univ. of Texas Public. 4720. 78-115. 1947. |
| [18] | Manning, A, “A sperm factor affecting the receptivity of Drosophila melanogaster females”. Nature. 194. 252-253. 1962. |
| [19] | Tram, U. and Wolfner, M. F, “Seminal fluid regulation of female sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster”. Proceedings of National Academy Science. 95. 4051-4054. 1998. |
| [20] | Tompkins, L., Gross, A.C., Hall, J. C., Gailey, D.A. and. Siegel, R.W. “The role of female movement in the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster”. Behav. Genet. 12: 295-307. 1982. |
| [21] | Fuyama, Y, “Genetic evidence that ovulation reduces sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females”. Behaviour Genetics. 25. 581-587. 1995. |
| [22] | Ringo, J, Sexual receptivity in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 41. 473-494. 1996 |
| [23] | Heifetz, Y., Tram, U. and Wolfner, M. F, “Male contributions to egg production the role of accessory gland products and sperm in Drosophila melanogaster”. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 268. 175-180. 2001. |
| [24] | Gromko, M. H., Gilbert, D. G. and Richmond, R. C, “Sperm transfer and use in the multiple mating system of Drosophila”. In: Sperm competition and the evolution of Animal Mating Systems. Academic Press, New York. 372-427. 1984. |
| [25] | Sgro, C. M. and Partridge, L, “A delayed wave of death from reproduction in Drosophila”. Science. 286. 2521-2524. 1999. |
| [26] | Wolfner, M. F, “Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products”. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 27. 179–192. 1997. |
| [27] | Neubaum, D. M. and Wolfner, M. F, “Mated Drosophila melanogaster females require a seminal fluid protein, Acp36DE, to store sperm efficiently”. Genetics. 153:845–857. 1999. |
| [28] | Scott, D, “The timing of the sperm effect on female Drosophila melanogaster receptivity”. Anim. Behav. 35. 142-149. 1987. |
| [29] | Sowmya, M. L. and Hegde, S.N, “Studies on the biodiversity and Sexual behavior of few species of Drosophila collected from Manasagangotri Mysore. Mysore” Dissertation submitted to university of Mysore. Mysore. 2009 |
| [30] | Halliday, T. and Arnold, S. J, “Multiple mating by females: a perspective form quantitative genetics”. Anim. Behav. 35. 939-941. 1987. |
| [31] | Gibson, R. M. and Jewell, P. A, “Semen quality, female choice and multiple mating in domestic sheep: A test of Trivers Sexual competence hypothesis”. Behaviour. 90. 9-31. 1982. |
| [32] | Walker, W. F, “Sperm utilization strategies in non-social insects”. Am. Nat. 115. 780-799. 1980. |
| [33] | Hedge, S. N. and Naseerulla, M. K, “Correlative studies on mating speed and metric traits in Drosophila malerkotiliana”. Ind. J. Expt. Biol. 30. 334-338. 1992. |
| [34] | Maynard Smith, J, “Fertility, mating behavior and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura”. J. Genet. 54. 261-279. 1956. |
| [35] | Singh, B. N. and Chatterjee, S, “Variation in mating propensity and fertility in isofemale strains of Drosophila ananassae”. Genetica. 73. 237-242. 1987. |
| [36] | Fulker, D. W. “Mating speed in male Drosophila melanogaster”: A psychogenetic analysis. Science. 153. 203-205. 1966. |
| [37] | Levine, L., Asmussen, M., Olvera, O., Powell, J. R., Delarosa, M. E., Salceeda, V. M., Gaso, M. I., Gujman, J. and Anderson, W. W, “Population genetics of Mexican Drosophila. A high rate of multiple inseminations in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura”. Am. Nat. 116. 493-503. 1980 |
| [38] | Pyle, D. W. and Gromko, M. H, “Repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster: the adaptive importance and fecundity in insects”. Bio Rev. 63. 509-549. 1978. |
| [39] | Stone, W. S. and. Patterson, J.T, “Fertilizations in multiple matings between species of the virilis group”. Univ. Texas Publ. 5422. 38-45. 1954. |
| [40] | Gromko, M. H. and Pyle, D.W, “Sperm competition, male fitness and repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster”. Evolution. 32. 588-593. 1978. |
| [41] | Newport, M. E. A. and Gromko, M. H, “The effect of experimental design on female receptivity to remating and its impact on reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster”. Evolution. 38. 1261-1272. 1984. |
| [42] | Gromko, M. H. and Gerhart, P. D, “Increased density does not increase remating frequency in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster”. Evolution. 38. 451-455. 1984. |
| [43] | Harshman, L. G., Hoffman, A. A. and Prout, T, “Environmental effects on remating in Drosophila melanogaster”. Evolution. 42. 312-321. 1988. |
| [44] | Trevitt, S., Fowler, K. and Partridge, L, “An effect of egg deposition on the subsequent fertility and remating frequency of female Drosophila melanogaster”. J. Insect Physiol. 34. 821-828. 1998. |
| [45] | Chapman, T., Trevitt, S. and Partridge, L, “Remating and male derived nutrients in Drosophila melanogaster”. J. Evol. Biol. 7. 51-69. 1994. |
| [46] | Beckenbach, A. T, “The “sex-ratio” trait in Drosophila Pseudoobscura: fertility relation of males and meiotic drive”. Amer. Nature. 112. 97-117. 1978. |
| [47] | Turner, M. E. and Anderson, W.W, “Multiple mating and female fitness in Drosophila Pseudobscura”. Evolution. 37. 714-723. . 1983. |
| [48] | Prakash, S, “Association between Mating speed and Fertility in Drosophila robusta”. Genetics. 57. 655-663. 1967. |
| [49] | Parsons, P. A, “Behavioural and ecological genetics: A study in Drosophila” (Oxford: Clarenden Press). 1973. |
| [50] | Friberg, U, “Male perception of female mating status: its effect on copulation duration, sperm defence and female fitness. Animal Behaviour”. 72. 1259–1268. 2006. |
| [51] | Chapman, T., Arnquist, G., Bangham, J. and Rowe, L. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18. 41-47. 2003. |
| [52] | Liu, H. and Kubli, E, “Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster”. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A., 100(17). 9929-33. 2003. |
| [53] | Moshitzky, P., Fleischmann, I., Chaimov, N., Saudan, P., Klauser, S., Kubli, E. and Applebaum, S. W, “Sex-peptide activates juvenile hormone biosynthesis in the Drosophila melanogaster corpus allatum”. Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol. 32(3-4). 363-74. 1996. |
| [54] | Soller, M., Bownes M, and Kubli, E, “Control of oocytes maturation in sexually mature Drosophila females”. Dev. Biol. 20. 337-51. 1999. |
| [55] | Dubrovskaya, V. A., Dubrovsky, E. B. and Berger, E. M, “Juvenile hormone signalling during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster”. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 32(11). 1555-65. 2002. |
| [56] | Santhosh, H. T. and Krishna, M. S, “Relationship between male age, accessory gland, sperm transferred, and fitness traits in Drosophila bipectinata”. Journal of Insect Science. 13:159. 2013 |
| [57] | Markow, T.A. and Ankey, P. F, “Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in a multiple species”. Science. 224. 302-303. 1984. |
| [58] | Pitnick, S, “Male size influences mate fecundity and remating interval in Drosophila melanogaster”. Animal Behaviour. 41. 735-745. 1991. |
| [59] | Markow, T. A, “A comparative investigation of the mating system of Drosophila hydei” Anim. Behav. 33. 775-781. 1985. |
| [60] | Singh, S. R. and Singh, B. N, “Female remating in Drosophila: comparison of duration of copulation between first and second mating in six species”. Current Science, 86. 465-470. 2004. |
| [61] | Sowmya, M. L. and Hegde, S. N, “Unusual male remounting and its fitness benefit in few species of montium subgroup of Drosophila”. International Journal of Current Research. Vol. 6. 5642-5646. 2014. |
| [62] | Peng, J., Chen, S., Busser, S., Liu, H. F., Honegger, T. and Kubli, E, “Gradual release of sperm bound sex peptide controls female postmating behavior in Drosophila”. Curr Biol., 15. 207-213. 2005. |
| [63] | Ravi Ram K. and Wolfner, M.F, “Seminal influences: Drosophila Acps and the molecular interplay between males and females during reproduction”. Integer Comp Biol., 47. 427–445. 2007. |
| [64] | Heifetz, Y., Lung, O., Frongillo, E. A. and Wolfner, M. F, The Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp26Aa stimulates release of oocytes by the ovary. Curr. Biol., 10. 99–102. 2000. |
| [65] | Gilbert, D. G., Richmond, R. C. and. Sheehan, K. B, “Studies of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Progeny production and sperm use in females inseminated by males having active or null alleles”. Evolution. 35. 21–37. 1981. |
| [66] | Marks, R. W., Seager, R. D. and Barr, L. G, “Local ecology and multiple mating in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster”. Am. Nat., 131. 918-923. 1988. |
APA Style
Sowmya M. L., S. N. Hegde. (2014). An Evidence of Enhanced Fitness by Male Remounting during the Courtship in three Species of Montium Subgroup of Drosophila. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2(3), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11
ACS Style
Sowmya M. L.; S. N. Hegde. An Evidence of Enhanced Fitness by Male Remounting during the Courtship in three Species of Montium Subgroup of Drosophila. Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2014, 2(3), 37-43. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11
AMA Style
Sowmya M. L., S. N. Hegde. An Evidence of Enhanced Fitness by Male Remounting during the Courtship in three Species of Montium Subgroup of Drosophila. Am J BioSci Bioeng. 2014;2(3):37-43. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11,
author = {Sowmya M. L. and S. N. Hegde},
title = {An Evidence of Enhanced Fitness by Male Remounting during the Courtship in three Species of Montium Subgroup of Drosophila},
journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering},
volume = {2},
number = {3},
pages = {37-43},
doi = {10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.20140203.11},
abstract = {Male mating a second female after first mate (male remating) is a common feature in Drosophila, particularly in mass culture. On the other hand, female remating is not as frequent as that of male remating because the sperms introduced along with the semen into the spermatheca are stored there. However, the phenomena of female remating have been reported in few species. During sexual activity, the males and females are involved an elaborate courtship at the end of which the male mounts on to the female followed by mating. During each mating, the mounted male through its ejaculate, transmits the sperms into the females' genital tract where it is stored. The sperms are stored in the spermatheca. Usually, with one mount maximum sperms are transferred to female hence second mounting does not occur. In most Drosophila, when a male mounts a female after an elaborate courtship, the pairs remain in cupola for a fixed period then dismounts. No more courtship or mounting is performed by the male towards the same female. In D.jambulina, D.nagarholensis and D.gangotrii remounting occurs two or three times immediately after the first mount. The reason for remounting has been analyzed in the present study through measuring the width of the female reproductive tract and sperm count after each mount. The female reproductive tract was dissected out and width of uterus was measured. The result showed significant difference in the width after each mount. The sperm count of these species after each mount also showed significant variation. Remounting perhaps enhances the fitness of the mating pairs.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - An Evidence of Enhanced Fitness by Male Remounting during the Courtship in three Species of Montium Subgroup of Drosophila AU - Sowmya M. L. AU - S. N. Hegde Y1 - 2014/08/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11 DO - 10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11 T2 - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering JF - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering JO - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering SP - 37 EP - 43 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5893 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20140203.11 AB - Male mating a second female after first mate (male remating) is a common feature in Drosophila, particularly in mass culture. On the other hand, female remating is not as frequent as that of male remating because the sperms introduced along with the semen into the spermatheca are stored there. However, the phenomena of female remating have been reported in few species. During sexual activity, the males and females are involved an elaborate courtship at the end of which the male mounts on to the female followed by mating. During each mating, the mounted male through its ejaculate, transmits the sperms into the females' genital tract where it is stored. The sperms are stored in the spermatheca. Usually, with one mount maximum sperms are transferred to female hence second mounting does not occur. In most Drosophila, when a male mounts a female after an elaborate courtship, the pairs remain in cupola for a fixed period then dismounts. No more courtship or mounting is performed by the male towards the same female. In D.jambulina, D.nagarholensis and D.gangotrii remounting occurs two or three times immediately after the first mount. The reason for remounting has been analyzed in the present study through measuring the width of the female reproductive tract and sperm count after each mount. The female reproductive tract was dissected out and width of uterus was measured. The result showed significant difference in the width after each mount. The sperm count of these species after each mount also showed significant variation. Remounting perhaps enhances the fitness of the mating pairs. VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: