This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of the impact of crop biodiversity on poverty reduction and to evaluate the biodiversity of cropping system and its effects on ecological sustainability in rural Sudan. It is based mainly on primary data collected from the household survey. The study focuses on the problem of rural farmers from a broader perspective, among agricultural farming systems in rural Sudan, named as traditional rainfed, irrigated and mechanized rainfed farming system. Poverty line and indicators were analyzed using the Foster Greer and Thorbecke method. The results of the study reveal that the poverty in rural Sudan had been more wide spread and deep in traditional and mechanized farms in contrast with the irrigated farms. In the irrigated farms the farm size is small and the framers are governed by government towards cropping systems and types of crops cultivated. In the mechanized and traditional farms the land size was large, so no rule of what types of crop cultivated. Biodiversity of the three farming systems is differed and concentrated in crop and livestock practices, no aquatic fisheries was practices in farms. The crop diversity is more practices by the non- poor farmers. Results also proved a significant correlation between crop biodiversity indicators with ecological sustainability in the cropping systems. The cultivation of the forage legume is a highly significantly affecting the sustainability in farms. Crop residues management has significantly a positive effect on the water use in the farms. Efficiency and sustainability of crops production would help poor farmers rise out of poverty.
| Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 1, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12 |
| Page(s) | 55-62 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biodiversity, Crops, Sustainability Indictors, Poverty
| [1] | Anthony, V.(2011). Crop Biodiversity Definitions, importance and threats. Syngenta Foundation 10th Anniversary Symposium |
| [2] | Bell, S. and Morse, S. (1999) Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable. London: Earthscan. |
| [3] | Brush, S., J.E. Taylor and M.R. Bellon. )1992(. Biological diversity and technology adoption in Andean potato agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 39:365-387. |
| [4] | Caballero, R. (1993). An experts’ survey on the role of forage legumes in arable cropping systems of the Mediterranean area. J. Sust. Agric., 3: 133-154. |
| [5] | Callicott, J.B., Crowder, L.B. and Mumford, M.R. (1999). Current normative concepts in conservation. Conservation Biology 13: 22–35. |
| [6] | Cassman, K. G., S. Wood, P. S. Choo, C. Cooper, C. Devendra, J. Dixon, J. Gaskell, S. Khan, R. Lal, L. Lipper, J. Pretty, J. Primavera, N. Ramankutty, E. Viglizzo, K. Weibe, S. Kadungure, N. Kanbar, Z. Khan, R. Leakey, S. Porter, K. Sebastian, and R. Tharme. )2005(. Cultivated Systems. In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Condition Working Group Report. Washington D.C.: Island Press. |
| [7] | Cromwell, E. Kambewa, P; Mwanza, R. and Chirwa R. with Kwera Development Centre, (2000). Impact Assessment Using Participatory Approaches: ‘Starter Pack’ And Sustainable Agriculture In Malawi. The Agricultural Research and Extension Network. Department for International Development (DFID). London, UK. |
| [8] | Cromwell, E.; Cooper, D. and Mulvany, P. (1997a). Agriculture, biodiversity and Livelihoods: Issues and Entry Points For Development Agencies. The Agricultural Research and Extension Network. Department for International Development (DFID). London, UK. |
| [9] | Cromwell, E; Cooper, D. and Mulvany, P. (1997). Agriculture, Biodiversity and Livelihoods: Issues And Entry Points For Development Agencies. Overseas Development Institute, Westminster Bridge Road. London |
| [10] | Damghani, A. M; Koocheki, A. and Moghaddam, P.R. and M.N. Mohallati (2007). Evaluation of Agrobiodiversity and its Effects on the Sustainability of a Wheat-Cotton Cropping System in Khorassan. Department of Agroecology, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University |
| [11] | Di Falco, S., Perrings C.(2003). Crop Genetic Diversity, Productivity and Stability of Agro-ecosystems: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol.50. no..2. |
| [12] | Elsheikh, S. and Siwar, C. (2004): Tenant Households and Poverty in the Gezira Irrigated Area, Sudan: Analysis and Implications. Faculty of Economics, University Kebangsaan, Selangor, Malaysia |
| [13] | Elzaki, R.M (2005). The feasibility of integration of livestock production in irrigated agriculture in Sudan. Gezira scheme. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Khartoum. Sudan. |
| [14] | FAO (2005). Integrating environmental and economic accounting at the farm level. Accounting for changes in the fertility of cultivated land. Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. Rome, 2005 |
| [15] | Foster, J., Greer, J. and E. Thorbecke, (1984). A New Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrical, vol. 51, no. 1. |
| [16] | Huhtala, A. and Sipiläinen, T. (2009). Do the opportunity costs of providing crop diversity differ between organic and conventional farms? The case of Finnish agriculture. MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Latokartanonkaari Helsinki, Finland. |
| [17] | Kontoleon, A., Pascual, U. and Smale, M. (2009) ‘Agrobiodiversity for economic development: what do we know?’, in A. Kontoleon, U. Pascual and M. Smale (eds). Agro-biodiversity Conservation and Economic Development, Routledge, London and New York, pp1–24. |
| [18] | Meng, E. )1997(. Land allocation decisions and in situ conservation of crop genetic resources: the case of wheat landraces in Turkey. Doctoral dissertation. University of California-Davis, Davis. |
| [19] | Mubarik, A. (1999). Evaluation of green manure Technology in tropical lowland rice systems. Field Crop Res., 61: 61-78. |
| [20] | Nankya, R. (2012). The Conservation of Diversity versus the Conservation of Poverty. Programe of Crop diversity to reduce pest and diseases. Kampala, Uganda. |
| [21] | Pender, J. (1999). Rural Population Growth, Agricultural Change and Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries: A review of Hypotheses and some Evidence from Honduras. Environment and Production Technology Division. International Food Policy Research Institute,Washington, U.S.A. |
| [22] | Qualset, C.O., McGuire, P.E. and Warburton, M.L. )1995(. ‘Agrobiodiversity’: key to agricultural productivity. California Agriculture 49(6). |
| [23] | Redford, K and Agrawal, A (2006) Poverty, Development, And Biodiversity Conservation: Shooting in the Dark? Working Paper No. 26 March 2006 |
| [24] | Smale, M., E. Meng, J.P. Brennan, Ruifa Hu, )2003a(. Determinants of spatial diversity in modern wheat: examples from Australia and China. Agricultural Economics, 28. |
| [25] | Smale, M., E. Meng, J.P. Brennan, Ruifa Hu, )2003(. Determinants of spatial diversity in modern wheat: examples from Australia and China. Agricultural Economics, 28. |
| [26] | Smale, M., Hartell, J., Heisey, P.W., Senauer, B., )1998(. The contribution of genetic resources and diversity to wheat production in the Punjab of Pakistan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80. |
| [27] | Smale, M., M. Bellon, and A. Aguirre. )2001(. Maize diversity, variety attributes, and Farmers’ choices in Southeastern Guanajuato, Mexico. Economic Development and Cultural Change 50(1):201-225. |
| [28] | Tilman.D. (2000) Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature Insight 405 (No. 6783, 11 May) 208-211. |
| [29] | Torknezhad, A., D. Mazaheri, H. Heydari Sharifabad and A. Ghalavand (1999). Evaluation of annual medics’ efficiency on fixing biological nitrogen and its implications in sustainable agricultural systems. Pajouhesh-va-sazandegi, 43: 22-25. |
| [30] | UNDP, (2005). Sudan - Details. Status and Trends of Biodiversity Overview. http://www.cbd.int/countries/profile.shtml?country=sd#status |
| [31] | USAID. 2004. Biodiversity. http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/environment/biodiversity/ |
| [32] | Walcott, J. (2004). Agriculture and biodiversity: connections for sustainable development. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. |
| [33] | Wale,E.; Drucker, A. G. and Zander, K.K.(2011). The Economics of Managing Crop Diversity On-farm. Case studies from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative. Earthscan Ltd, Dunstan House, London, UK. |
| [34] | Widawsky, D., and S. Rozelle, )1998(. Varietal diversity and yield variability in Chinese rice production, in M. Smale ed., Farmers, Gene Banks, and Crop Breeding, Kluwer, Boston. |
| [35] | Wood, D. and Lenné, J.M. (eds) )1999(. Agrobiodiversity: characterization, utilization and management. CABI, Wallingford. |
APA Style
Raga Mohamed Elzaki, Azharia Abdelbaghi Elbushra, Ali Musa Eissa, Shams Eldein Hassab Alla Ahmed. (2013). Crop Biodiversity: Potential of Sustainability Indicators and Poverty Reduction in Farming Systems in Sudan. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 1(4), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12
ACS Style
Raga Mohamed Elzaki; Azharia Abdelbaghi Elbushra; Ali Musa Eissa; Shams Eldein Hassab Alla Ahmed. Crop Biodiversity: Potential of Sustainability Indicators and Poverty Reduction in Farming Systems in Sudan. Am. J. Agric. For. 2013, 1(4), 55-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12
AMA Style
Raga Mohamed Elzaki, Azharia Abdelbaghi Elbushra, Ali Musa Eissa, Shams Eldein Hassab Alla Ahmed. Crop Biodiversity: Potential of Sustainability Indicators and Poverty Reduction in Farming Systems in Sudan. Am J Agric For. 2013;1(4):55-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12,
author = {Raga Mohamed Elzaki and Azharia Abdelbaghi Elbushra and Ali Musa Eissa and Shams Eldein Hassab Alla Ahmed},
title = {Crop Biodiversity: Potential of Sustainability Indicators and Poverty Reduction in Farming Systems in Sudan},
journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
volume = {1},
number = {4},
pages = {55-62},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20130104.12},
abstract = {This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of the impact of crop biodiversity on poverty reduction and to evaluate the biodiversity of cropping system and its effects on ecological sustainability in rural Sudan. It is based mainly on primary data collected from the household survey. The study focuses on the problem of rural farmers from a broader perspective, among agricultural farming systems in rural Sudan, named as traditional rainfed, irrigated and mechanized rainfed farming system. Poverty line and indicators were analyzed using the Foster Greer and Thorbecke method. The results of the study reveal that the poverty in rural Sudan had been more wide spread and deep in traditional and mechanized farms in contrast with the irrigated farms. In the irrigated farms the farm size is small and the framers are governed by government towards cropping systems and types of crops cultivated. In the mechanized and traditional farms the land size was large, so no rule of what types of crop cultivated. Biodiversity of the three farming systems is differed and concentrated in crop and livestock practices, no aquatic fisheries was practices in farms. The crop diversity is more practices by the non- poor farmers. Results also proved a significant correlation between crop biodiversity indicators with ecological sustainability in the cropping systems. The cultivation of the forage legume is a highly significantly affecting the sustainability in farms. Crop residues management has significantly a positive effect on the water use in the farms. Efficiency and sustainability of crops production would help poor farmers rise out of poverty.},
year = {2013}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Crop Biodiversity: Potential of Sustainability Indicators and Poverty Reduction in Farming Systems in Sudan AU - Raga Mohamed Elzaki AU - Azharia Abdelbaghi Elbushra AU - Ali Musa Eissa AU - Shams Eldein Hassab Alla Ahmed Y1 - 2013/10/30 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 55 EP - 62 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20130104.12 AB - This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of the impact of crop biodiversity on poverty reduction and to evaluate the biodiversity of cropping system and its effects on ecological sustainability in rural Sudan. It is based mainly on primary data collected from the household survey. The study focuses on the problem of rural farmers from a broader perspective, among agricultural farming systems in rural Sudan, named as traditional rainfed, irrigated and mechanized rainfed farming system. Poverty line and indicators were analyzed using the Foster Greer and Thorbecke method. The results of the study reveal that the poverty in rural Sudan had been more wide spread and deep in traditional and mechanized farms in contrast with the irrigated farms. In the irrigated farms the farm size is small and the framers are governed by government towards cropping systems and types of crops cultivated. In the mechanized and traditional farms the land size was large, so no rule of what types of crop cultivated. Biodiversity of the three farming systems is differed and concentrated in crop and livestock practices, no aquatic fisheries was practices in farms. The crop diversity is more practices by the non- poor farmers. Results also proved a significant correlation between crop biodiversity indicators with ecological sustainability in the cropping systems. The cultivation of the forage legume is a highly significantly affecting the sustainability in farms. Crop residues management has significantly a positive effect on the water use in the farms. Efficiency and sustainability of crops production would help poor farmers rise out of poverty. VL - 1 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: