| Peer-Reviewed

Agricultural Innovation System: Case of Cassava Producers in Kajo-Keji, South Sudan

Received: 23 May 2017    Accepted: 2 June 2017    Published: 9 June 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the innovation system of cassava producers related to “Food, Agribusiness and Rural Markets” (FARM) project. Socioeconomic and farm characteristics and information systems of farmers covered by FARM project and farmers not covered by FARM project members were compared and the relations between these characteristics and the innovations score were analyzed. Farmers covered by FARM project and not covered had significant differences in land preparations information sources, seed information sources and fertilizers usefulness. The results indicated that the age of farmers, land preparation information score, agricultural experience, cassava yield, number of family household, number of labor in the farm, number of family workers and casual workers were positively correlated with innovation score. Innovativeness of farmers classified according to their innovation score to less innovative and innovative. The two groups were tested with age, agricultural experience, family household, family workers in the farm, access to agricultural information, access to market and marketing experience and found significant with their innovativeness. It shows that those factors were important to consider it to the innovativeness of cassava farmers in the Kajo-keji. Recommendations for further development of cassava and strong collaboration among the stakeholders, public and private institutions is needed to encourage conventional cassava farmers to adopt modern cassava farming innovations can be suggested.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13
Page(s) 94-101
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Agricultural Innovation System, Innovation Score, Stakeholders, Cassava, Kajo-Keji, South Sudan

References
[1] IITA: IITA 2015. Support to Agricultural Research for Development of Strategic Crops in Africa (SARD-SC) Project Farmers’ Guide to Cassava Cultivation. In: www.iita.org. (Accessed May 2015) Available at: HYPERLINK "http://docplayer.net/31031744-Farmers-guide-to-cassava-cultivation.html".
[2] Vasco M., C., Nico, V.: Input Diffusion and the Evolution of Production Networks. Cambridge and CEPR UCLA, NBER, and CEPR First Version (2014).
[3] Demiryurek, K.: gricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems and Social Communication Networks. Ondokuz Mayıs University. (2014).
[4] World Bank: Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. World Bank, Washington, DC (2006).
[5] Röling, N.: Extension Science: Information systems in agricultural development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988).
[6] Demiryurek K., E.: Agricultural information systems and communication networks: the case of dairy farmers in the Samsun province of Turkey. Information Research 13(2), 25 (2008).
[7] USAID: Food, Agriculture And Rural Markets (FARM) Project Mid - Term Evaluation Report. (2012).
[8] Ariza C. R., D.: Measuring Innovation in Agricultural Firms: A Methodological Approach. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 11(3), 185-198 (2013).
[9] Demiryurek et al, K.: Effect of Dairy Cattle Breeders’ Association (DCBA) Membership on Sustainability of Innovations in Samsun Province of Turkey. In: Conference: 2nd ICSAE 2015 İnternational Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, Turkey, Konya, pp.1-4 (2015).
[10] Demiryurek, K.: Agricultural Systems Volume 103, Issue 7, September 2010, Pages Cover image Analysis of information systems and communication networks for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in the Samsun province of TurkeyKursat Demiryurek, Show more https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.04.002. Agricultural Systems 103(7), 444–452 (September 2010).
[11] Amankwah K., K.: Diagnosing constraints to market participation of s mall ruminant producers in northern Ghana: an innovation systems analysis. Life Science 60(63), 37–47. (2012).
[12] Asogwa B. C., U.: Technical Efficiency Analysis of Nigerian Cassava Farmers: A guide for Food Security Policy. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Gold Coast, Australia (2006).
[13] Ani, J.: Relationship between socio-economic characteristics of rural women farmers and their adoption of farm technologies in southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria. nternational Journal of Agriculture & Biology 06(5), 802-805 (2010).
[14] Carlsson B., S.: On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Evol. Econ 1, 93-118 (1991).
[15] Chi T., Y.: Factors affecting farmers' adoption of technologies in farming system: A case study in OMon district, Can Tho province, Mekong Delta. Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, 99-100 (2002).
[16] Demiryurek, K.: Information systems and communication networks for agriculture and rural people. Agric. Econ 56(5), 209 (2010).
[17] Dusenbury, A.: Post-conflict returnee reintegration: a case study of South Sudan and the livelihood approach. (2013).
[18] FAO: Farmer Experimentation and Innovation. A case study of knowledge generation. (1996).
[19] FAO: Background paper for the Competitive Commercial Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (CCAA) Study Cassava: International market profile., 11 (2007).
[20] FAO: Development of Agriculture in South Sudan., FAO (2011).
[21] FAO: Crop Planting Assessment Mission to Western and Central Equatoria Republic of South Sudan April 2014 Report 1 in preparation for the Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission (CFSAM)., FAO, Rome (2011).
[22] FAO: Save and Grow: Cassava A guide to sustainable production intensification. (2013).
[23] FAO-WFP.: Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to South Sudan. (2014).
[24] Hall, A.: Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it. Journal of International Development, 17(5), 611–630 (2005).
[25] Hall, A.: Public-private sector partnerships in an agricultural system of innovation: Concepts and challenges. nternational Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 5(1), 3-20 (2006).
[26] IITA: Southern Sudan, Equatoria Region, Cassava Baseline Survey Technical Report. (2007).
[27] Kilelu, C., Klerkx, L.: Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation. Agricultural Systems(118), 65–77 (2013).
[28] Klerkx, L.: Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103 (2010).
[29] Klerkx, L.: Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(6), 849–860 (2009).
[30] Klerkx, L.: Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy 33(3), 260-276 (2008).
[31] UNMISS: Kajo-Keji, South Sudan: General Information., United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMISS) (2010).
[32] USAID: Food, Agriculture and Rural Markets (FARM) project. mid – term evaluation report, USAID (2013).
[33] World Bank: Agricultural Innovation Systems: An Investment Sourcebook. Elsevier, Washington, DC (2012).
[34] World Bank: Enhancing agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. World Bank, Washington, DC (2006).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    James Drfoun Amol Ajak, Kursat Demiryurek. (2017). Agricultural Innovation System: Case of Cassava Producers in Kajo-Keji, South Sudan. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 5(4), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    James Drfoun Amol Ajak; Kursat Demiryurek. Agricultural Innovation System: Case of Cassava Producers in Kajo-Keji, South Sudan. Am. J. Agric. For. 2017, 5(4), 94-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    James Drfoun Amol Ajak, Kursat Demiryurek. Agricultural Innovation System: Case of Cassava Producers in Kajo-Keji, South Sudan. Am J Agric For. 2017;5(4):94-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13,
      author = {James Drfoun Amol Ajak and Kursat Demiryurek},
      title = {Agricultural Innovation System: Case of Cassava Producers in Kajo-Keji, South Sudan},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {5},
      number = {4},
      pages = {94-101},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20170504.13},
      abstract = {The purpose of this paper was to analyze the innovation system of cassava producers related to “Food, Agribusiness and Rural Markets” (FARM) project. Socioeconomic and farm characteristics and information systems of farmers covered by FARM project and farmers not covered by FARM project members were compared and the relations between these characteristics and the innovations score were analyzed. Farmers covered by FARM project and not covered had significant differences in land preparations information sources, seed information sources and fertilizers usefulness. The results indicated that the age of farmers, land preparation information score, agricultural experience, cassava yield, number of family household, number of labor in the farm, number of family workers and casual workers were positively correlated with innovation score. Innovativeness of farmers classified according to their innovation score to less innovative and innovative. The two groups were tested with age, agricultural experience, family household, family workers in the farm, access to agricultural information, access to market and marketing experience and found significant with their innovativeness. It shows that those factors were important to consider it to the innovativeness of cassava farmers in the Kajo-keji. Recommendations for further development of cassava and strong collaboration among the stakeholders, public and private institutions is needed to encourage conventional cassava farmers to adopt modern cassava farming innovations can be suggested.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Agricultural Innovation System: Case of Cassava Producers in Kajo-Keji, South Sudan
    AU  - James Drfoun Amol Ajak
    AU  - Kursat Demiryurek
    Y1  - 2017/06/09
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 94
    EP  - 101
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170504.13
    AB  - The purpose of this paper was to analyze the innovation system of cassava producers related to “Food, Agribusiness and Rural Markets” (FARM) project. Socioeconomic and farm characteristics and information systems of farmers covered by FARM project and farmers not covered by FARM project members were compared and the relations between these characteristics and the innovations score were analyzed. Farmers covered by FARM project and not covered had significant differences in land preparations information sources, seed information sources and fertilizers usefulness. The results indicated that the age of farmers, land preparation information score, agricultural experience, cassava yield, number of family household, number of labor in the farm, number of family workers and casual workers were positively correlated with innovation score. Innovativeness of farmers classified according to their innovation score to less innovative and innovative. The two groups were tested with age, agricultural experience, family household, family workers in the farm, access to agricultural information, access to market and marketing experience and found significant with their innovativeness. It shows that those factors were important to consider it to the innovativeness of cassava farmers in the Kajo-keji. Recommendations for further development of cassava and strong collaboration among the stakeholders, public and private institutions is needed to encourage conventional cassava farmers to adopt modern cassava farming innovations can be suggested.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agricultural Economics, Upper Nile University, Juba, South Sudan

  • Department of Agricultural Economics, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

  • Sections