| Peer-Reviewed

Species Richness and Nutritive Values of Fodder and Their Relationship with Soil Characteristics in Ugandan Rangelands

Received: 18 July 2017    Accepted: 31 July 2017    Published: 18 May 2018
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the species richness and nutritive values of fodder and their relationship with soil characteristics in the Ugandan rangelands. The aim of the study was to determine the current status and nutritive values of fodder species and their relationship with soil characteristics. Four fodder species Panicum maximum - Guinea grass, Spartinaalterniflora - Cord grass, Hyperreniarufa -Jaragua/thatching grass and Acacia spp were selected for the study. The species were counted to determine their richness in their rangelands and also tested to establish their nutritive values. The focus on nutritive values was on CP, NDF, Ca, P and K. The research also determined the soil characteristics pH, OM, N, P and K. Results of the study show that the fodder species were below the recommended levels of species richness in the rangelands. Spartinaalterniflora (Cord grass) had the largest coverage of 109.1Km2 (22.4%) out of 486Km2 in the rangelands while Acacia had the lowest coverage of 10.2 Km2 (2.1%). All the soil characteristics were below the minimum concertration levels apart from P and there was a significant difference in soil characteristics across the different locations (P<0.05). Average pH was 6.63, OM was 0.5%, and P was 74.09ppm while K was 17cmoles/kg. The most nutritious fodder species was Panicum maximum (Guinea grass). However all the fodder species were below the recommended nutrient levels. The mean concentration level of CP in all the fodder species was8.95%, Ca was 1.29%, P was 0.4%, K was 1.59% while NDF was 29%. There was no significant difference in level of concentration across all the fodder species (P>0.05). Reduction of overstocking; growing of Panicum maximum (Guinea grass) at farm level; and rotation of animals are recommended.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11
Page(s) 38-43
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rangeland, Fodder Species, Soil Characteristics, Species Richness

References
[1] M. Maharjan, “Soil Carbon and Nutrient status of rangeland in upper Mustang,” Institute of Forestry Pokhara, Nepal, Tribhuvan University, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Watershed Management, 2010.
[2] N. O. J. Abel, and P. M Blaikie, “Land degradation, stocking rates and conservation policies in the communal rangelands of Botswana and Zimbabwe”. Land Degradation & Development, Vol. 1, No.2, 2006, 101–123.
[3] N. L. Kapu, “Assessment of Rangeland Condition and Evaluation of the Nutritional Value of Common Grass and Browse Species at the Neudamm Experimental Farm, Namibia”. MSc. Thesis University of Namibia, 2012
[4] A. Egeru, O. Wasonga, J. Mburu, E. Yazan, M. G. Majaliwa, L. MacOpiyo and Y. Bamutaze,“Drivers of forage availability: An integration of remote sensing and traditional ecological knowledge in Karamoja sub-region,” Uganda. Pastoralism, Vol. 5, No. 20151, 1-18.
[5] P. J. Skerman and F. Riveros, “Tropical Grasses. FAO Publications”, 1990. Available: http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Gbase/Data/Pf000259.htm (Accessed: May 20, 2016).
[6] Food Agricultural Organisation (FAO), “Panicum maximum, guinea grass, colonial grass, Tanganyika grass,” 2003, http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/AFRIS/DATA/11 8.HTM.
[7] A. D. Inselman, “Environmental degradation and conflict in Karamoja, Uganda: the decline of a pastoral society. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues Issue: Vol. 3, No. 2, 2003, 168 – 187
[8] S. A. Nalule, “Social management of rangelands and settlement in Karamoja.” Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala – Uganda, 2010 in Eilu, G., Hafashimana, D. L. N., &Kasenene, J. M., 2004. Density and species diversity of trees in four tropical forests of the Albertine rift, western Uganda. Diversity and Distributions 10, 303 312.
[9] E. M. Kennedy, J. P. McEvoy and O. M. Murphy, “Effect of restricted access time to pasture on dairy cow milk production, grazing behaviour, and dry matter intake”. 2013, 169-179.
[10] A. Nimusiima, C. P. K. Basalirwa, J. G. M Majaliwa, W, Otim-Nape, J. Okello-Onen, C Rubaire-Akiiki, Konde-Lule. J and S Ogwal-Byenek, “Nature and dynamics of climate variability in the Uganda cattle corridor.” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 8, 2013, 770-782.
[11] J. R. Okalebo, K. W. Gathua and P. L. Woomer, “Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working manual, 2nd Edition. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED Africa, Nairobi, Kenya, 1992.
[12] M. Smet, and D. Ward, “A comparison of the effects of different rangeland management systems on plant species composition, diversity and vegetation structure in a semi-arid savanna.” African Journal of Range and Forage Science. Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 59-71.
[13] T. B. Solomon, “Rangeland dynamics in southern Ethiopia: Botanical composition of grasses and soil characteristics in relation to land-use and distance from water in semi-arid Borana rangelands”. Journal of Environmental Management Vol. 85, 2007, 429-442
[14] I. C. Okoli, C. S. Ebere, M. C. Uchegbu, C. A. Udah and I. I. Ibeawuchi, “A survey of the diversity of plants utilized for small ruminant feeding in south-eastern Nigeria.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Vol. 96, 2009, 147-154.
[15] G. Tilahun, “Soil fertility status as influenced by different land uses in Maybar areas of South Wello Zone, North Ethiopia.” A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Plant Sciences, School of Graduate Studies Haramaya University, 2007.
[16] E. J. Mtengeti and A. Mhelela, Screening of potential indigenous browse species in semi-arid central Tanzania. A case of Gairo division. Livestock Research for Rural development Vol. 18, No. 9, 2006.
[17] NSW, “Soil management for dairy and beef cattle grazing,” (NSW Agriculture, Grafton), 2004.
[18] P. J. Van Soest, “Nutritional ecology of the ruminant”: Cornell University Press, 1990
[19] P. J. Van Soest, J. Robertson and B. Lewis,“Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.”Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 74 No. 10, 1991 3583-3597.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Christine Kyoshabire, Sarah Kizza, Karumuna Rollanda. (2018). Species Richness and Nutritive Values of Fodder and Their Relationship with Soil Characteristics in Ugandan Rangelands. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 6(3), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Christine Kyoshabire; Sarah Kizza; Karumuna Rollanda. Species Richness and Nutritive Values of Fodder and Their Relationship with Soil Characteristics in Ugandan Rangelands. Am. J. Agric. For. 2018, 6(3), 38-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Christine Kyoshabire, Sarah Kizza, Karumuna Rollanda. Species Richness and Nutritive Values of Fodder and Their Relationship with Soil Characteristics in Ugandan Rangelands. Am J Agric For. 2018;6(3):38-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11,
      author = {Christine Kyoshabire and Sarah Kizza and Karumuna Rollanda},
      title = {Species Richness and Nutritive Values of Fodder and Their Relationship with Soil Characteristics in Ugandan Rangelands},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {38-43},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20180603.11},
      abstract = {A study was conducted to determine the species richness and nutritive values of fodder and their relationship with soil characteristics in the Ugandan rangelands. The aim of the study was to determine the current status and nutritive values of fodder species and their relationship with soil characteristics. Four fodder species Panicum maximum - Guinea grass, Spartinaalterniflora - Cord grass, Hyperreniarufa -Jaragua/thatching grass and Acacia spp were selected for the study. The species were counted to determine their richness in their rangelands and also tested to establish their nutritive values. The focus on nutritive values was on CP, NDF, Ca, P and K. The research also determined the soil characteristics pH, OM, N, P and K. Results of the study show that the fodder species were below the recommended levels of species richness in the rangelands. Spartinaalterniflora (Cord grass) had the largest coverage of 109.1Km2 (22.4%) out of 486Km2 in the rangelands while Acacia had the lowest coverage of 10.2 Km2 (2.1%). All the soil characteristics were below the minimum concertration levels apart from P and there was a significant difference in soil characteristics across the different locations (PPanicum maximum (Guinea grass). However all the fodder species were below the recommended nutrient levels. The mean concentration level of CP in all the fodder species was8.95%, Ca was 1.29%, P was 0.4%, K was 1.59% while NDF was 29%. There was no significant difference in level of concentration across all the fodder species (P>0.05). Reduction of overstocking; growing of Panicum maximum (Guinea grass) at farm level; and rotation of animals are recommended.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Species Richness and Nutritive Values of Fodder and Their Relationship with Soil Characteristics in Ugandan Rangelands
    AU  - Christine Kyoshabire
    AU  - Sarah Kizza
    AU  - Karumuna Rollanda
    Y1  - 2018/05/18
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 38
    EP  - 43
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20180603.11
    AB  - A study was conducted to determine the species richness and nutritive values of fodder and their relationship with soil characteristics in the Ugandan rangelands. The aim of the study was to determine the current status and nutritive values of fodder species and their relationship with soil characteristics. Four fodder species Panicum maximum - Guinea grass, Spartinaalterniflora - Cord grass, Hyperreniarufa -Jaragua/thatching grass and Acacia spp were selected for the study. The species were counted to determine their richness in their rangelands and also tested to establish their nutritive values. The focus on nutritive values was on CP, NDF, Ca, P and K. The research also determined the soil characteristics pH, OM, N, P and K. Results of the study show that the fodder species were below the recommended levels of species richness in the rangelands. Spartinaalterniflora (Cord grass) had the largest coverage of 109.1Km2 (22.4%) out of 486Km2 in the rangelands while Acacia had the lowest coverage of 10.2 Km2 (2.1%). All the soil characteristics were below the minimum concertration levels apart from P and there was a significant difference in soil characteristics across the different locations (PPanicum maximum (Guinea grass). However all the fodder species were below the recommended nutrient levels. The mean concentration level of CP in all the fodder species was8.95%, Ca was 1.29%, P was 0.4%, K was 1.59% while NDF was 29%. There was no significant difference in level of concentration across all the fodder species (P>0.05). Reduction of overstocking; growing of Panicum maximum (Guinea grass) at farm level; and rotation of animals are recommended.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ministry of Water and Environment, Department of Environment Affairs, Kampala, Uganda

  • Department of Engineering and Environment, Uganda Christian University, Mukono, Uganda

  • Health and Environment Research International (HERI), Kampala, Uganda

  • Sections