Cathode current efficiency (CCE) of Zn/SiO2 composite electrodeposition bath was investigated. Influence of current density, particle loading, bath agitation, deposition time and bath additive were given particular attention. It was revealed that CCE and particle content in the deposit were inversely proportional to one another with increase in particle loading up to 80g/l, beyond which both decreased. Influence of time on CCE for different particle loadings shows that CCE was significantly higher for baths with lower amount of particles than those with higher amount of particles. However, CCE shows an increasing trend with bath agitation for both 13g/l and 26g/l particle loading with that of 26g/l being higher for all amplitudes investigated. Also, addition of NaNO3 additive into the bath was found to improve the CCE of the bath. Influence of current density was investigated for a bath with 104g/l of SiO2. The results show a sharp decrease in CCE from current density of 15A/dm2 and were constant for higher current densities up to 30A/dm2. Morphological changes accompanied changes in CCE.
| Published in | International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications (Volume 1, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11 |
| Page(s) | 93-99 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Zinc, Composite electrodeposition, Morphology, Cathode current efficiency, SiO2
| [1] | X. Bin-shi, W. Hai-dou, D. Shi-yun, J. Bin and T. Wei-yi, Electrodepositing Nickel Silica Nano-Composites Coatings, Electrochemistry Communications 7, pp 572-575 (2005) |
| [2] | T. J. Tuaweri and G. D. Wilcox, Influence of SiO₂ Particles on Zinc-nickel Electrodeposition, Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing, 85, pp 245-253 (2007) |
| [3] | A. Afshar, M. Ghorbani and M. Mazaheri, Electrodeposition of Graphite-Bronze Coatings and Study Of Electroplating Characteristics, Surface & Coating Technology, 187, pp 293-299 (2004) |
| [4] | R. Balaji, M. Pushpavanam, K. Yogesh and K, Kumar, Subramanian, Electrodeposition of bronze-PTFE composite coatings and study of their tribological characteristics, Surface & Coating Technology, 201, pp 3205-3211 (2006) |
| [5] | M. R Vaezi, S.K Sadrnezhaad and L. Nikzad, Electrodeposition of Ni-Sic Nano-Composite Coatings and Evaluation of Wear And Corrosion Resistance and Electroplating Characteristics, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 315, pp 176-182, (2008) |
| [6] | G. Yu, X. Huang, C. Zou, L. Chen, B. Hu, L. Ye, Preparation of graphite@Cu powders from ultrasonic powdering technique, Advance Powder Technology, 23, pp16-21 (2012) |
| [7] | R. Manu, S. Priya, Implication of electrodeposition parameters on the architecture behaviour of MWCNT-incorporated metal matrix. Applied Surface Science 284, pp 270-277 (2013). |
| [8] | Y. Yang, Y. F. Cheng, Fabrication of Ni-Co-SiC composite coatings by pulse electrodeposition- Effects of duty cycle and pulse frequency, Surface and Coating Technology, 216, 282-288 (2013) |
| [9] | R. P. Socha, P. Nowak, K. Laajalehto, and J. Vayrynen, Particle-Electrode Surface Interaction During Nickel Electrodeposition from Suspensions Containing SiC and SiO2 Particles", Colloids and Surfaces A, 235, pp 45-55 (2004) |
| [10] | F.A. Lowenheim, Modern Electroplating, 3rd ed. John Wiley, USA, 7 (1974) |
| [11] | R.K. Saha and T.I. Khan, Effect of applied current on the electrodeposited Ni-Al2O3 composite coatings, Surface & Coating Technology, 205, pp 890-895 (2010) |
| [12] | M. Ghorbani, M. Mazaheri, K. Khangoli and Y. Kharazi, Electrodeposition of graphite-brass composite coatings and characterization of the tribological properties, Surface & Coating Technology, 148, pp 71 (2001) |
| [13] | M Abe, Y Shiohara, T Adaniya and H Naemura, Composite Zinc-Silica Electro-Galvanized Steel Sheet Excellent in Corrosion Resistance - US Patent 4,839,241, (1989) |
| [14] | P. Nowak, R.P. Socha, M. Kaisheva, J. Fransaer, J.P. Celis and Z. Stoinov, Electrochemical Investigation of The Codeposition of SiC And SiO2 Particles With Nickel, J. Appl. Electrochem., 30, Issue 4, pp 429-437 (2000) |
| [15] | D. Aslandis, J. Fransaer, and J.P Celis, J. Electrochem. Soc., 144 (7), pp 2352 (1997) |
| [16] | H.B Muralidhara and Y. A. Naik, Electrochemical Deposition Of Nanocrystalline Zinc On Steel Substrate From Acid Zincate Bath, Surface & Coating Technology, 202 pp 3403-3412 (2008) |
| [17] | T. J. Tuaweri and G. D. Wilcox, Behaviour of Zn-SiO₂ Electrodeposition in the Presence of N,N-dimethyldodecylamine, Surface & Coating Technology, 200, pp5921-5930 (2006) |
| [18] | A. Takahashi, Y. Miyoshi and T. Hada, Surf. Technol., 44, pp 977 (1993) |
| [19] | B. Sharifi, M. Mojtahedi, M. Goodarzi and J.V. Khaki, Effect of Alkaline Electrolysis Conditions on Current Efficiency and Morphology Of Zinc Powder, Hydrometallurgy 99, pp 72 (2009) |
| [20] | W. Huang, M. Wang, H. Wang, N. Ma and X. Li, The Electrodeposition of Aluminium on Tib2/A356 Composite from Ionic Liquid as Protective Coating, Surface & Coatings Technology, 213, pp 264-270 (2012) |
| [21] | N. Guglielmi, Kinetics of the Deposition of Inert Particles from Electrolytic Baths, J. Electrochem. Soc. 119, pp 1009 (1972) |
| [22] | K. Kurozaki, J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 10 (1979) |
| [23] | M. Mouanga, L. Ricq, G. Douglade, J. Douglade and P. Bercot, Influence of coumarin on zinc electrodeposition, Surface & Coating Technology 201, pp 762-767 (2006) |
| [24] | M. Abe, S. Yukimitsu, A. Takeshi and N. Hiroshi, United States Patent, 4,839,241 June, (1989) |
| [25] | T. J. Tuaweri, Zinc and zinc alloy composite coatings for corrosion protection and wear resistance, P.hD Thesis Loughborough Univ. pp 135 (2006) |
| [26] | A. Ciszewski, Posluszny, G. Milczarek and M. Baraniak, Effects of saccharin and quaternary ammonium chlorides on the electrodeposition of nickel from a Watts-type electrolyte, Surface & Coatings Technology, 183, pp. 127-133 (2004) |
APA Style
Tolumoye Johnnie Tuaweri, Emmanuel Munakurogha Adigio, Pressy Proctor Jombo. (2013). Influence of Process Parameters on the Cathode Current Efficiency of Zn/SiO2 Electrodeposition. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications, 1(5), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11
ACS Style
Tolumoye Johnnie Tuaweri; Emmanuel Munakurogha Adigio; Pressy Proctor Jombo. Influence of Process Parameters on the Cathode Current Efficiency of Zn/SiO2 Electrodeposition. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Appl. 2013, 1(5), 93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11
AMA Style
Tolumoye Johnnie Tuaweri, Emmanuel Munakurogha Adigio, Pressy Proctor Jombo. Influence of Process Parameters on the Cathode Current Efficiency of Zn/SiO2 Electrodeposition. Int J Mech Eng Appl. 2013;1(5):93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11,
author = {Tolumoye Johnnie Tuaweri and Emmanuel Munakurogha Adigio and Pressy Proctor Jombo},
title = {Influence of Process Parameters on the Cathode Current Efficiency of Zn/SiO2 Electrodeposition},
journal = {International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications},
volume = {1},
number = {5},
pages = {93-99},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmea.20130105.11},
abstract = {Cathode current efficiency (CCE) of Zn/SiO2 composite electrodeposition bath was investigated. Influence of current density, particle loading, bath agitation, deposition time and bath additive were given particular attention. It was revealed that CCE and particle content in the deposit were inversely proportional to one another with increase in particle loading up to 80g/l, beyond which both decreased. Influence of time on CCE for different particle loadings shows that CCE was significantly higher for baths with lower amount of particles than those with higher amount of particles. However, CCE shows an increasing trend with bath agitation for both 13g/l and 26g/l particle loading with that of 26g/l being higher for all amplitudes investigated. Also, addition of NaNO3 additive into the bath was found to improve the CCE of the bath. Influence of current density was investigated for a bath with 104g/l of SiO2. The results show a sharp decrease in CCE from current density of 15A/dm2 and were constant for higher current densities up to 30A/dm2. Morphological changes accompanied changes in CCE.},
year = {2013}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Influence of Process Parameters on the Cathode Current Efficiency of Zn/SiO2 Electrodeposition AU - Tolumoye Johnnie Tuaweri AU - Emmanuel Munakurogha Adigio AU - Pressy Proctor Jombo Y1 - 2013/11/30 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11 T2 - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications JF - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications JO - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications SP - 93 EP - 99 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0248 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20130105.11 AB - Cathode current efficiency (CCE) of Zn/SiO2 composite electrodeposition bath was investigated. Influence of current density, particle loading, bath agitation, deposition time and bath additive were given particular attention. It was revealed that CCE and particle content in the deposit were inversely proportional to one another with increase in particle loading up to 80g/l, beyond which both decreased. Influence of time on CCE for different particle loadings shows that CCE was significantly higher for baths with lower amount of particles than those with higher amount of particles. However, CCE shows an increasing trend with bath agitation for both 13g/l and 26g/l particle loading with that of 26g/l being higher for all amplitudes investigated. Also, addition of NaNO3 additive into the bath was found to improve the CCE of the bath. Influence of current density was investigated for a bath with 104g/l of SiO2. The results show a sharp decrease in CCE from current density of 15A/dm2 and were constant for higher current densities up to 30A/dm2. Morphological changes accompanied changes in CCE. VL - 1 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: