Bibliometric Study of Welding Scientific Publications by Big Data Analysis
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
Volume 3, Issue 5, October 2015, Pages: 94-102
Received: Jul. 11, 2015; Accepted: Aug. 28, 2015; Published: Sep. 14, 2015
Views 4024      Downloads 105
Authors
Pavel Layus, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Skinnarilankatu, Lappeenranta, Finland
Paul Kah, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Skinnarilankatu, Lappeenranta, Finland
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Researchers are nowadays overloaded with scientific information, and it is often difficult to obtain a clear overview of existing topical research in some particular field. Big data tools and instruments can be utilized to define trending research topics by analyzing recent publications. This paper analyses 12000 articles related to arc welding from the Scopus database for the period 2001-2012 using VOS viewer and Microsoft Excel. The most commonly occurring keywords are presented statically and as a time series. The results of this paper provide an overall landscape of scientific research in the field of arc welding and help indicate trends of emerging topics in welding research. This work is of value to both industry and academia as an indicator of changes in the field and areas of current interest. Some guidelines for potential future research on the subject are provided.
Keywords
Bibliometrics, Scopus, Keywords, VOS Viewer, Big Data, Research Trends, Welding
To cite this article
Pavel Layus, Paul Kah, Bibliometric Study of Welding Scientific Publications by Big Data Analysis, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2015, pp. 94-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20150305.13
References
[1]
A. K. Sheela, Global Welding Products Market is Expected to Reach USD 23.78 billion by 2020, Transparency Market Research, 2015, http://www. Transparency market research. com/pressrelease/welding-products-market. htm.
[2]
T. Zhang, Z. Li, F. Young, H. Jin Kim, H. Li, H. Jing, W. Tillmann, Global progress on welding consumables for HSLA steel, ISIJ International, 54 (7), 2014, pp. 1472-1484, DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.1472, 2014.
[3]
A. Kawamoto, Newly arc welding equipment, Keikinzoku Yosetsu/Journal of Light Metal Welding and Construction, 51 (6), 2013, pp. 5-9.
[4]
A. Haelsig, M. Kusch, P. Mayer, New findings on the efficiency of gas shielded arc welding, Welding in the World, 56 (11-12), 2012, pp. 98-104, DOI: 10.1007/BF03321400.
[5]
P. Kah, H. Latifi, R. Suoranta, J. Martikainen, M. Pirinen, Usability of arc types in industrial welding, International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 9 (1), 2014, 12 p., DOI: 10.1186/s40712-014-0015-6.
[6]
S. Hiroyuki, Materials and processes for arc welding, Yosetsu Gakkai Shi/Journal of the Japan Welding Society, 80 (8), 2011, pp. 21-30.
[7]
R. E. Gliner, Welding of advanced high-strength sheet steels, Welding International, 25 (5), 2011, pp. 389-396, DOI: 10.1080/09507116.2011.554234.
[8]
L. F. Jeffus, Welding: Principles and Applications, Cengage Learning, 2004, 904 p.
[9]
R. Singh, Applied Welding Engineering: Processes, Codes, and Standards, Elsevier, 2011, 349 p.
[10]
L. Bornmann and R. Mutz, Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, DOI: 10.1002/asi.23329 [in press, available online only].
[11]
X. Jin, B. W. Wah, X. Cheng, Y. Wang, Significance and Challenges of Big Data Research, Big Data Research, ISSN 2214-5796, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.006 [in press, available online only].
[12]
F. W. Fosso, S. Akter, A. Edwards, G. Chopin, D. Gnanzou, How ‘big data’ can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study, International Journal of Production Economics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031 [in press, available online only].
[13]
A. Vera-Baquero, R. Colomo-Palacios, O. Molloy, Towards a Process to Guide Big Data Based Decision Support Systems for Business Processes, Procedia Technology, vol. 16, 2014, pp. 11-21, ISSN 2212-0173, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.063.
[14]
R.K. Perrons, J.W. Jensen, Data as an asset: What the oil and gas sector can learn from other industries about “Big Data”, Energy Policy, vol. 81, June 2015, pp. 117-121, ISSN 0301-4215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.020.
[15]
A. Gandomi, M. Haider, Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics, International Journal of Information Management, vol 35 (2), April 2015, pp. 137-144, ISSN 0268-4012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007.
[16]
W. Li, Y. Zhao, Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 50, January 2015, pp. 158-166, ISSN 0195-9255, http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. eiar.2014. 09. 012.
[17]
M. Y. Han, X. Sui, Z.L. Huang, X.D. Wu, X.H. Xia, T. Hayat, A. Alsaedi, Biblio-metric indicators for sustainable hydropower development, Ecological Indicators, vol 47, December 2014, pp. 231-238, ISSN 1470-160X, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.035.
[18]
D. Boanares, C. Schetini de Azevedo, The use of nucleation techniques to restore the environment: a bibliometric analysis, Natureza & Conservação, vol 12 (2), July–December 2014, pp. 93-98, ISSN 1679-0073, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2014.09.002.
[19]
Q. Wang, Z. Yang, Y. Yang, C. Long, H. Li, A bibliometric analysis of research on the risk of engineering nanomaterials during 1999–2012, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 473–474, 1 March 2014, pp. 483-489, ISSN 0048-9697, http://dx. doi. org/10.1016/j. scitotenv. 2013. 12. 066,
[20]
J. Young, R. Chi, Intercultural relations: A bibliometric survey, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, vol. 37 (2), March 2013, pp. 133-145, ISSN 0147-1767, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.11.005.
[21]
VOS viewer software, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands, 2015, http://www.vosviewer.com/.
[22]
J. I. Granda-Orive, A. Alonso-Arroyo, F. Roig-Vázquez, Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS, Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition), vol. 47, issue 4, 2011, p. 213, ISSN 1579-2129,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1579-2129(11)70049-0.
[23]
Ulrichsweb, ProQuest. Avaliable at http://www. proquest. com/products-services/Ulrichsweb. html, [accessed on 5.08. 2015].
[24]
A. Paul-Hus and P. Mongeon, The journal coverage of bibliometric databases: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science, Proceeding of METRICS 2014 workshop at ASIS & T, 5 November 2014, Seattle, USA. 1751-1577, http://dx. doi. org/10.1016/j. joi. 2015. 05. 002.
[25]
L-E. Svensson, Control of Microstructures and Properties in Steel Arc Welds, CRC Press, 1993, p. 256.
[26]
S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p. 480.
[27]
H. Bhadeshia, R. Honeycombe, Steels – Microstructure and Properties, Elsevier, 2006, p. 354.
[28]
J. C. Valderrama-Zurián, R. Aguilar-Moya, D. Melero-Fuentes, R. Aleixandre-Benavent, A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus, Journal of Informetrics, vol. 9, issue 3, July 2015, pp. 570-576, ISSN.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931