| Peer-Reviewed

Fracture Toughness Testing and Prediction for Ceramic Materials Using in Large-Flow-Rate Emulsion Pumps

Received: 20 April 2019    Accepted: 28 May 2019    Published: 12 June 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Fracture toughness (KIC) tests have been carried out on single edge precracked beam specimens with dimensions in accordance with ISO15732 requirements for two types of zirconia and one type of alumina, i.e. ZrO2 -1, ZrO2 -2 and Al2O3. Experimental determinations of KIC for the two zirconia and one alumina materials are 12.18 MPa•m1/2, 16.35 MPa•m1/2 and 4.99 MPa•m1/2, respectively. The median rank method is used to calculate the probability of fracture, F(KIC) of the three cermaic materials for representing the experimental results. The SEM analysis on fracture surfaces of ZrO2-1 materials is carried out, which indicates the fracture in ZrO2 -1 material occurred at the interior of the grain associated with interior stress distribution with principal components of ZrO2 and SiO2. Th extended finite element method (XFEM), based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics in conjuciton with a bilinear traction-separation damage law, is used to simulate the progressive crack growth process in the SEPB specimens. The XFEM predicted KIC results are compared with the corresponding experimental data. The XFEM approach overpredicts the KIC values, from 10.4% to 25.6%, for the three ceramic materials. The possible reasons, in the aspect of loading conditions and contact assumptions, for the difference between the predicted and tested results are also discussed.

Published in International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12
Page(s) 46-53
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Fracture Toughness, Single Edge Precracked Beam, Zirconia, Alumina, XFEM

References
[1] Wang Guofa, Pang Yihui, Xu Yajun, et al. Longwall mining technology and equipment system integration [M]. Beijing: Coal Industry Press, 2016.
[2] Li Ran, Wang Wei, Su Zhe. Numerical study on thermohydrodynamic performance of journal bearing in high-pressure and large-flow-rate emulsion pump [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39 (S2): 576-582.
[3] ISO15732-2003 [S]. Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics) — Test method for fracture toughness of monolithic ceramics at room temperature by single edge precracked beam (SEPB) method, International Organization Standardization, 2003.
[4] Warren P D. Determining the fracture toughness of brittle materials by hertzian indentation. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 1995, 15 (3): 201-207.
[5] Quinn G D, Swab J J, Hill M D. Fracture toughness by the surface crack in flexure (SCF) method: new test results. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures-B: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. Cocoa Beach: AcerS, 1994, 18 (4).
[6] Yan J, Clifton K B, Jr M J, et al. Fracture toughness of manatee rib and bovine femur using a chevron-notched beam test. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39 (6): 1066-1074.
[7] Wang B L and Wang K F. Effect of surface residual stress on the fracture of double cantilever beam fracture toughness specimen. Journal of Applied Physics 2013, 113 (15): 83.
[8] Moes N, Dolbow, J and Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 46 (1): 131-150.
[9] Nagamani J B, Vikram J and Sanjay K B. A new method for fracture toughness determination of graded (pt,ni)al bond coats by microbeam bend tests. Philosophical Magazine, 2012, 92 (25-27): 3326-3345.
[10] Eftekhari M, Ardakani S H and Mohammadi S. An XFEM multiscale approach for fracture analysis of carbon nanotube reinforced concrete. Theoretical & Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72 (1): 64-75.
[11] Goel S, Kumar N, Fuloria D, et al. Evaluating fracture toughness of rolled zircaloy-2 at different temperatures using XFEM. Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance, 2016, 25 (9): 1-13.
[12] Rickhey F, Jin H L, Lee H. XFEM investigation on knoop indentation cracking: fracture toughness and aspect-ratio of radial-median cracks. Materials & Design 2016, 107: 393-405.
[13] Marimuthu K P, Rickhey F, Jin H L, et al. Spherical indentation for brittle fracture toughness evaluation by considering kinked-cone-crack. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 2017, 37 (1): 381-391.
[14] Wallin K, Saario T and Törrönen K. Theoretical Scatter in Brittle Fracture Toughness Results Described by the Weibull Distribution. Application of Fracture Mechanics to Materials and Structures. Springer Netherlands, 1984: 511-518.
[15] Moes N, Dolbow J and Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999, 46 (1): 131-150.
[16] Xu S L and Reinhardt H W. A Simplified method for determining double-K fracture parameters for three point bending tests [J]. International Journal of Fracture 2000, 104 (2): 181-200.
[17] Barenblatt G I. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech, 1959, 23 (3): 622-636.
[18] Oliveira F. Crack modelling with the extended finite element method. Lisboa: Instituto Superior Técnico, 2013
[19] ABAQUS, Inc. ABAQUS 6.14 standard user manual. Providence, RI: ABAQUS, Inc., 2014.
[20] Mohammadi T, Wan B and Harries K. Intermediate Crack Debonding Model of FRP-Strengthened Concrete Beams Using XFEM. Simulia Community Conference 2013.
[21] Jiang L, Wang C Y, Zheng S N, et al. Effect of Fe2O3 on optical properties of zirconia dental ceramic. Chinese Journal of Dental Research, 2015, 18 (1): 35-40.
[22] Schierano G, Mussano F, Faga MG, et al. An alumina toughened zirconia composite for dental implant application: in vivo animal results. BioMed Research International, 2015, 5: 157360.
[23] Nojima T, Tsuyoshi H. Effect of initial crack length and specimen geometry on fracture toughness of rate sensitive ceramics. Journal of the Society of Materials Science Japan, 1995, 44 (499): 445-450.
[24] Harada K, Shinya A, Yokoyama D, et al. Effect of loading conditions on the fracture toughness of zirconia. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2013, 57 (2): 82-87.
[25] Trunec M and Chlup Z. Higher fracture toughness of tetragonal zirconia ceramics through nanocrystalline structure. Scripta Materialia, 2009, 61 (1): 56-59.
[26] Mueller M G, Pejchal V, Agar G, et al. Fracture toughness testing of nanocrystalline alumina and fused quartz using chevron-notched microbeams. Acta Materialia, 2015, 86: 385-395.
[27] Deng Z Y, She J, Inagaki Y, et al. Reinforcement by crack-tip blunting in porous ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2004, 24 (7): 2055-2059.
[28] Simpson L A. Use of the notched-beam test for evaluation of fracture energies of ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1974, 57: 151-154.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ran Li, Wenshu Wei, Shoubin Li, Yinshui Liu, Hao Liu, et al. (2019). Fracture Toughness Testing and Prediction for Ceramic Materials Using in Large-Flow-Rate Emulsion Pumps. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications, 7(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ran Li; Wenshu Wei; Shoubin Li; Yinshui Liu; Hao Liu, et al. Fracture Toughness Testing and Prediction for Ceramic Materials Using in Large-Flow-Rate Emulsion Pumps. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Appl. 2019, 7(2), 46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ran Li, Wenshu Wei, Shoubin Li, Yinshui Liu, Hao Liu, et al. Fracture Toughness Testing and Prediction for Ceramic Materials Using in Large-Flow-Rate Emulsion Pumps. Int J Mech Eng Appl. 2019;7(2):46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12,
      author = {Ran Li and Wenshu Wei and Shoubin Li and Yinshui Liu and Hao Liu and Huigang Wu and Wei Wang and Jian Ye and Chenjin Tian and Dalong Wang and Mengyu Wu and Jiankai Zhang},
      title = {Fracture Toughness Testing and Prediction for Ceramic Materials Using in Large-Flow-Rate Emulsion Pumps},
      journal = {International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {46-53},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmea.20190702.12},
      abstract = {Fracture toughness (KIC) tests have been carried out on single edge precracked beam specimens with dimensions in accordance with ISO15732 requirements for two types of zirconia and one type of alumina, i.e. ZrO2 -1, ZrO2 -2 and Al2O3. Experimental determinations of KIC for the two zirconia and one alumina materials are 12.18 MPa•m1/2, 16.35 MPa•m1/2 and 4.99 MPa•m1/2, respectively. The median rank method is used to calculate the probability of fracture, F(KIC) of the three cermaic materials for representing the experimental results. The SEM analysis on fracture surfaces of ZrO2-1 materials is carried out, which indicates the fracture in ZrO2 -1 material occurred at the interior of the grain associated with interior stress distribution with principal components of ZrO2 and SiO2. Th extended finite element method (XFEM), based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics in conjuciton with a bilinear traction-separation damage law, is used to simulate the progressive crack growth process in the SEPB specimens. The XFEM predicted KIC results are compared with the corresponding experimental data. The XFEM approach overpredicts the KIC values, from 10.4% to 25.6%, for the three ceramic materials. The possible reasons, in the aspect of loading conditions and contact assumptions, for the difference between the predicted and tested results are also discussed.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Fracture Toughness Testing and Prediction for Ceramic Materials Using in Large-Flow-Rate Emulsion Pumps
    AU  - Ran Li
    AU  - Wenshu Wei
    AU  - Shoubin Li
    AU  - Yinshui Liu
    AU  - Hao Liu
    AU  - Huigang Wu
    AU  - Wei Wang
    AU  - Jian Ye
    AU  - Chenjin Tian
    AU  - Dalong Wang
    AU  - Mengyu Wu
    AU  - Jiankai Zhang
    Y1  - 2019/06/12
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12
    T2  - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
    JF  - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
    JO  - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
    SP  - 46
    EP  - 53
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0248
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20190702.12
    AB  - Fracture toughness (KIC) tests have been carried out on single edge precracked beam specimens with dimensions in accordance with ISO15732 requirements for two types of zirconia and one type of alumina, i.e. ZrO2 -1, ZrO2 -2 and Al2O3. Experimental determinations of KIC for the two zirconia and one alumina materials are 12.18 MPa•m1/2, 16.35 MPa•m1/2 and 4.99 MPa•m1/2, respectively. The median rank method is used to calculate the probability of fracture, F(KIC) of the three cermaic materials for representing the experimental results. The SEM analysis on fracture surfaces of ZrO2-1 materials is carried out, which indicates the fracture in ZrO2 -1 material occurred at the interior of the grain associated with interior stress distribution with principal components of ZrO2 and SiO2. Th extended finite element method (XFEM), based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics in conjuciton with a bilinear traction-separation damage law, is used to simulate the progressive crack growth process in the SEPB specimens. The XFEM predicted KIC results are compared with the corresponding experimental data. The XFEM approach overpredicts the KIC values, from 10.4% to 25.6%, for the three ceramic materials. The possible reasons, in the aspect of loading conditions and contact assumptions, for the difference between the predicted and tested results are also discussed.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Tiandi-Marco Electronic-Hydraulic Control System Company Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing, China

  • Sections