Considerations on the Use of Lumina-Porous® Biomaterial in Maxillary Sinus Floor
International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Volume 3, Issue 1, February 2015, Pages: 1-4
Received: Jan. 30, 2015; Accepted: Feb. 13, 2015; Published: Feb. 25, 2015
Views 2799      Downloads 228
Authors
Douglas Rangel Goulart, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
Luciana Asprino, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
Márcio de Moraes, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
Claudio Ferreira Nóia, Dentistry Department, University of Araras, Araras, Brazil
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure, aka sinus floor lift surgery, stand out within the universe of bone reconstruction given that the maxillary sinus is a closed cavity with favorable nutrition, which enables the use of biomaterials alone. Therefore, this study aimed to report and discuss the technical and biological peculiarities of Lumina-Porous® biomaterial alone in the maxillary sinus by describing a sinus lift case which presented with little remaining bone. After the graft incorporation period two implants were installed in the grafted area to provide proper patient rehabilitation.
Keywords
Bone Graft, Biomaterial, Predictability
To cite this article
Douglas Rangel Goulart, Luciana Asprino, Márcio de Moraes, Claudio Ferreira Nóia, Considerations on the Use of Lumina-Porous® Biomaterial in Maxillary Sinus Floor, International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbmr.20150301.12
References
[1]
Nóia CF, Ferreira-Nóia C, Marques TR, Pinto JMV, Ortega-Lopes R. Influência do gênero e da idade no processo de reparo ósseo. Estudo radiográfico prospectivo em 30 pacientes. Implantnews. 2012; 9(6a-PBA):189-94.
[2]
Kuhl S, Gotz H, Brochhausen C, Jakse N, Filippi A, d’Hoedt B, et al. The influence of substitute materials on bone density after maxilarry sinus augmentation. A microcomputed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 2012; 27(6):1541-6.
[3]
Kuhl S, Brochhausen C, Gotz H,FilippiA,Payer M, d’Hoedt B, et al. The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation. A microcomputed tomography study. Cli Oral Investig. 2013; 17(2):543-51.
[4]
Richart D, Slater JJ, Meijer HJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary sinus lift with solely autogenous bone compared to a combination of autogenous bone and growth factors or (solely) bone substitutes. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(2):160-7.
[5]
Maiorana C, Beretta M, Batista Grossi G, Santoro F, Scott Herford A, Nagurski H, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone coverage to reduce autogenous grafts resorption: preliminary results. Open Dent J. 2011; 25(5):71-8.
[6]
Stabile GAV. Avaliação retrospectiva de oito anos dos procedimentos implantodônticos associados ou não a procedimentos reconstrutivos realizados na Área de Cirurgia Buco-Maxilo-Facial da Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba. [dissertação]. Piracicaba (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2006.
[7]
Pereira-Filho VA, Hochuli-Vieira E, Gabrielli MAC, Queiroz TP, Chávez OFM. Distração osteogênica mandibular para instalação de implantes: Relato de caso. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2007; 7(1):51-58.
[8]
Rodríguez-Chessa JG. Tratamento de maxilas atróficas por meio de fixações zigomáticas. Análise retrospectiva de 03 anos, [tese]. Piracicaba (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2009.
[9]
Nóia CF. Avaliação radiográfica prospectiva de alterações estéticas em pacientes submetidos à remoção de enxerto de mento [dissertação]. Piracicaba (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2011.
[10]
Nóia CF, de Oliveira NK, Ferreira-Nóia C, Ortega-Lopes R, Mazzonetto R. Utilização da crista ilíaca nas reconstruções ósseas da cavidade oral: Relato de Caso. Rev Dental Press Periodontia Implantol. 2011; 5(2):74-82.
[11]
Acocella A, Bertolai R, Nissan J, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometri cevaluation of the healing of mandibular ramus bone block grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation before implant placement. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg. 2010; 38(2); 22-30.
[12]
Ortega-Lopes R, Nóia CF, Chaves Neto HDM, Andrade VC, Cidade CPV, Mazzonetto R. Otimização em reconstrução total de maxila através da modificação estrutural do enxerto e diminuição do intervalo cirúrgico. Implantnews. 2012; 9(3):383-92.
[13]
Monje A, Monje F, Hernandes-Alfaro F, González-Garcia R, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, et al. Horizontal bone augmentation using autogenous block brafts and particulate xenograft in the severe atrophic maxillary anterior ridges. J Oral Implantol. 2014; no prelo.
[14]
Cosso MG, de Brito RB Jr, Piattelli A, Shibli JA, Zenóbio EG. Volumetric dimensional changes of autogenous bone and the mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone graft in humans maxillary sinus augmentation. A multislice tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014:25(11):1251-5.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186