Effect of Four Different Formulated Rations on Production Performance and Egg Quality Traits of Fayoumi Chickens
International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Volume 8, Issue 2, December 2020, Pages: 20-24
Received: Oct. 8, 2020;
Accepted: Nov. 26, 2020;
Published: Dec. 11, 2020
Views 80 Downloads 13
Tesfa Geleta, Oromiya Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Zeway, Ethiopia
Four experimental rations were formulated from locally available protein and energy source feed to study its effect on the production performance, on some egg quality traits for fayoumi chickens and to know the financially feasibility of such locally formulated rations for fayoumi layer chickens. Ninety six fayoumi chickens of 24 weeks of age were subjected to four formulated rations. Each of the four treatments were replicated three times with 8 birds (1 male: 7 females) per replicate. Each replicate feed was fed in group in feeding pens. Feed intake and egg production data were collected daily for each replicate. Dry matter feed intake was not significantly different (P >0.05) between treatments 1 and 3, and between treatments 2 and 4. Significantly higher (P<0.05) egg production and egg weight were observed in treatment 2 with no significant difference (P>0.05) among the other three treatments. Egg shell weight (g), shell thickness (mm) and Yolk color did not differ (P>0.05) significantly among the treatments. In the current study net profit of 47.2, 39.4, 21.41 and 15.3 Ethiopian Birr were obtained per bird on treatments 2, 3, 4 and 1 respectively within six months of feeding period. Locally available protein and energy source feed can be used for the formulation of nutritionally balanced and economically feasible diet for fayoumi layers chickens. Ration formulated from 0.5% limestone, 0.5% salt, 1% layers premixes, 28% wheat bran, 3.5% fish meal, 11.5% soybean, 32% maize and 23% noug cake was found to be financially feasible and recommendable in areas with similar climatic conditions to Adami Tulu area and in area where these feed ingredients are available.
Effect of Four Different Formulated Rations on Production Performance and Egg Quality Traits of Fayoumi Chickens, International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.
Vol. 8, No. 2,
2020, pp. 20-24.
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Evan J. (2010). Poultry breed facts. The way of chicken.com /index.php/2017/05/10. https://wordpress.org
Ann. (2017). The way of chicken.com /index.php/2017/05/10. https://wordpress.org
Hunduma Dinka, Regassa, Chala Fufa Dawo, Samson Leta, Endale Bekana. (2010). Socio- economic importance and management of village chicken production in rift valley of Oromia, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (11).
Branckaert, RDS, Guèye E. (2000). FAO’s Programme for support to family poultry production. http://www.husdry.kvl.dk/htm/tune99/24.branckaert.thm.
Solomon D. (2004). Egg production performance of local and White Leghorn hens under intensive and rural house hold conditions in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (2) 2004.
ESGPIP (Ethiopian sheep and goat productivity improvement program). (2008). Formulation of rations for sheep and goats. Technical Bulletin No. 16.
Gopalakrishnan CA, Mohanal M G.. (2004). Livestock and poultry Enterprises for rural development.
Richard O, Church D C. (1998). Livestock feeds and feeding. 4th ed. Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited, London.
Adugna T. (2007). Feed Resource for producing Export Quality meat and meat Livestock in Ethiopia. Examples from selected Woredas in Oromia and SNNP Regional states. December, 2007. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 46, 52, 75.
Smith J A. (2001). The tropical Agriculturalist. Poultry.
ATARC (Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center) (2019). Metrological.
SAS. (2001). SAS user`s Guide: statistics, Release 8.2. SAS Inst., carry. Nc.
CIMMT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An economics training manual. CIMMT, DF, Mexico.
Ehui S, Rey B. (1992). Partial budget analysis for on station and on-farm small ruminant Production systems research method and data requirements. In: proceeding of the first Biennial conference of the Africa small ruminant Research net work. ILRAD, Nirobi, Kenya 10-14 December, 1990.
AOAC (Association of official Analytical chemist). (1990). 15th ed. AOAC Arlington, vergina, USA.
Valkonen E, Venäläinen E, Rossow L, Valaja J. (2008). Effects of dietary energy content on the performance of laying hens in furnished and conventional cages. Poult Sci. 2008 May; 87 (5): 844-52. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00237.
Tesfa Geleta, Samson Leta, Endalew Bekana. (2013). Production performance of Fayoumi chickens under intensive management condition of Adami Tuluresearch center. International Journal of Livestock Product. Vol. 4 (10), pp. 172-176, December, 2013.
Khan, M. K. J, Khatun, M. J, Bhiyan, M. S. A, Sharmin R. (2006). Production performance of fayoumi chiken under intensive management. Pakistan Journal of Biological science 9 (2): 179-181, 2006.
Ribeiro PAP, Matos, Jr JB, Lara LJC, Araújo L F, Albuquerque R, Baião NC. (2014). Effect of dietary energy concentration on performance parameters and egg quality of white leghorn laying hens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. vol. 16 no. 4 Campinas Oct./Dec. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-635X1604381-388
Asghedom, G, Kjos, N. P, Austbo D. (2008). Effect of Fishmeal Supplementation on Egg Production of Rhode Island Red Layers in Eritrea. College of Agriculture and Aquatic Sciences, University of Asmara., In: Tanzania J. Agric. Sc. (2006) Vol. 7 No. 2, 77-86.
Tesfa Geleta, Samson Leta. (2015). Effect of dietary energy and protein combination on egg production performance of Fayoumi chickens. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review ISSN 2315-6880 Vol. 4 (3) pp. 089-093 March 2015.