Evaluating The Effect of Temperature and Polymer Concentration on Properties of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Gravel Pack Fluid
American Journal of Chemical Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 3-1, May 2017, Pages: 21-27
Received: Mar. 29, 2017;
Accepted: Mar. 31, 2017;
Published: Apr. 15, 2017
Views 1976 Downloads 123
Anthony Okon John, World Bank African Centre of Excellence, Institute of Petroleum Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Ogbonna Joel, Centre for Petroleum Research and Training, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Franklin Chukwuma, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
The commercial success of petroleum wells depends greatly on the type of completion, especially the choice of gravel packing fluid system for wells with gravel pack completions. Currently several polymers are in use to viscosify gravel pack fluids. These polymers are expected to exhibit acceptable properties such as good solubility, viscosity yield, rheology, sand carrying capacity, thermal stability, break profile, low residue content and others, to match the job requirements, in order not to jeopardize the sand control process or cause hydrocarbon production impairment. Hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), one of the most commonly used polymers used in formulating gravel pack fluids has so many good qualities, such as very low solid residues and easy clean out. In this paper, gel break time was investigated for 40lbs/1000gal and 60lbs/1000gal HEC polymer concentrations at 140°F, 160°F and 180°F, using Sodium Persulfate as gel breaker at concentrations of 1.0lbs/1000gal, 5.0lbs/1000gal, 10.0lbs/1000gal and 20.0lbs/1000gal. The proppant carrying capacity at different temperatures was also investigated. Test results indicated that gel break is a function of temperature, breaker and polymer concentrations. At higher temperatures and higher breaker concentrations, gel break is faster, but slower for higher polymer concentration.
Anthony Okon John,
Evaluating The Effect of Temperature and Polymer Concentration on Properties of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Gravel Pack Fluid, American Journal of Chemical Engineering. Special Issue: Oil Field Chemicals and Petrochemicals.
Vol. 5, No. 3-1,
2017, pp. 21-27.
N. J. Adams, “Drilling Engineering – A complete well planning approach”, Pennwell Books, 227-234, 454-455 (1985).
L. W. Lake, J. D. Clegg and W. L. Penberthy, Petroleum Engineering Handbook – Sand Control, Chapter 5, Volume IV – Production Operations Engineering, SPE, 175-239 (2006).
H. H. Abass, J. M. Wilson, J. J. Vendhitto and R. E. Voss, Stimulating weak formation using new hydraulic fracturing and sand control approaches. SPE 25494, Oklahoma city, OK, U.S.A., March 21- 23, 1993.
L. G. Jones, C. S. Yeh, T. J. Yates, D. W. Bryant, M. Doolittle, J. C. Wand Healy (1991): Alternate path gravel packing. SPE 22796, Dallas, TX, October 6-9, 1991.
M. Tolan, R. J. Tibbles, J. Alexander, P. Wassouf, L. Schafer and M. Paiar, Gravel packing Long openhole intervals with viscous fluids utilizing high gravel concentrations: Toe-to-Heel without the need for alternate flow paths. SPE 121912, Jarkata, Indonesia, 4-6 August, 2009.
H. T. Nguyen and J. M. Lafontaine, Effect of various additives on the properties of the clarified XC polymer system. Paper SPE 19404-MS, Louisiana, February 22-23, 1990.
B. R. Reddy, Viscosification-on-Demand: Chemical Modification of Biopolymer to Control Their Activity by Triggers in Aqueous Solutions. Paper SPE 141007, Woodlands, TX, 11-13 April, 2011.
S. Jain, B. Gadiyar, B. Stamm, C. Abad, M. Parlar, and S. Shah, Friction Pressure Performance of Commonly used Viscous Gravel Packing Fluids. SPE 134386, Florence, Tuscany, Italy, 20-22 September, 2010.
F. El-Dhabi and R. Bulgachev, Gravel packing depleted reservoirs. Paper SPE 143929 Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 7-10 June, 2011.
R. C. Cole and S. A. Ali, A Comparative study of succinoglycan gravel pack gel properties to those of HEC. Paper SPE 28533, New Orleans, Louisiana, September, 25-28, 1994.
D. P. Vollmer and D. J. Alleman, HEC no longer the preferred polymer. Paper SPE 65398, Houston, Texas, February 13-16, 2001.
D. R. Underdown, A. L. Calvert and D. P. Newhouse, Comparison of HEC and XC Polymer Gravel Pack Fluids”. SPE 19751, San Antonio, Texas, October 8-11, 1989.
O. F. Joel, O. F. F. T. Ademiluyi and M. C. Iyalla, Modelling break time on gravel pack fluid at different breaker concentrations and temperatures. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 4, NO. 7, 33-40. ISBN 1819-6608 (2009).
C. Harris, “Fracturing fluid additives”. SPE Distinguished Author Series, Journal of Petroleum Technology, October, 1988. 1277-1279.
M. U. Sarwar, K. E. Cawiesel and H. A. Nasr-El-Din, Gel degradation studies of oxidative and enzyme breakers to optimize breaker type and concentration for effective break profile at low and medium temperature ranges. Paper SPE 140520, Woodlands, TX, 24-25 Jan., 2011.
A. R. Jennings Jr., Fracturing Fluids-Then and Now. SPE36166, Technology Today Series, JPT, 604-610 (1996).
Montgomery, C. (2013): Fracturing Fluids. Paper presented at International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fractioning. An ISRM Specialized Conference, Brisbane, Australia, May.
R. F. Sheuerman, A new look at gravel pack carrier fluid. SPE Production Engineering, January. 9-15, 1986.
G. A. Al-Muntashari, A critical review of hydraulic fracturing fluids over the last decade. SPE 169552 Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., 16-18 April, 2014.
Baroid, Manual of Drilling Fluids Technology - Fundamental characteristic of drilling fluid (1979).