American Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2015, Pages: 26-30
Received: Jan. 23, 2015;
Accepted: Feb. 9, 2015;
Published: Mar. 2, 2015
Views 3381 Downloads 545
Md. Akhtar Hossain, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Md. Shakhawat Hossain, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Md. Kamrul Hasan, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Improvement in subgrade has always been an area of concern to highway and geotechnical engineers. In case of a highway, a weak subgrade results in greater thickness of pavement layer which increases the cost of pavement construction. To strengthen the subgrade soil, the use of jute fiber is advantageous because they are cheap, locally available, biodegradable, and eco-friendly. Jute fiber mixed randomly with subgrade soil has significant impact on the improvement of subgrade characteristics over the last decade. Keeping this in view an experimental study was conducted on locally available soil reinforced with jute fiber. In this study the soil samples were prepared at its maximum dry density corresponding to optimum moisture content in the CBR mold with and without reinforcement. The percentage of jute fiber by dry weight of soil was taken as 0.3%, 0.6%, 0.9%, and 1.2%. In the present investigation the length of fiber was taken as 15 mm and 30 mm, and two different diameters (4 mm and 8 mm) were considered for each fiber length. From the laboratory tests the effect of jute fiber content on density of soil (optimum moisture content and maximum dry density) was observed for each length and diameter of jute fiber. It was observed that the optimum moisture content increases and the maximum dry density decreases with the increase in jute fiber content for each length and diameter of jute fiber. The laboratory CBR values of soil and soil reinforced with fiber were determined. The effects of aspect ratio (length/diameter ratio) of jute fiber on CBR value of soil were also investigated. Test results indicate that CBR value of soil increases with the increase in length of jute fiber. It was also observed that increasing the diameter of jute fiber further increases the CBR value of reinforced soil, and this increase is substantial at fiber content of 1.2% for aspect ratio of 3.75 (length = 30 mm, diameter = 8 mm).
Md. Akhtar Hossain,
Md. Shakhawat Hossain,
Md. Kamrul Hasan,
Application of Jute Fiber for the Improvement of Subgrade Characteristics, American Journal of Civil Engineering.
Vol. 3, No. 2,
2015, pp. 26-30.
Aggarwal, P. and Sharma, B., “Application of Jute Fiber in the Improvement of Subgrade Characteristics”. International Journal on Transportation and Urban Development, 2011; 1(1), 56-58.
Singh, H. P. and Bagra, M., “Improvement in CBR Value of Soil Reinforced with Jute Fiber”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2013; Vol. 2, Issue 8, 3447-3452.
Tera, S., and Reddy Jagannatha, H.P., “International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2011; 2 (3), 186-191.
Gray, D.H., and Ohashi, H., “Mechanics of fiber reinforcing in sand”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983; 112 (8), 335-353.
Rao, P.J. “Jute Geotextile for improving the performance of Highway Embankment on soft Marine Soil”, Proc. Nat. Sem, on Jute based Geotextiles, New Delhi, 1996.
Singh, H.P., “Strength Characteristics of Soil Reinforced With Geosynthetic”. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2011; 4 (6), 969-971.
Sivakumar B., G.L., and Vasudevan, A.K., “Strength and Stiffness Response of Coir -Reinforced Tropical Soil”. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2008; 571-578.
Singh, H.P., “Improvement in CBR Value of Soil Reinforced with Coir fiber”. 3rd International Conference on Natural Polymer, (2012); held at Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam, Kerala, India. 26-27 October Paper No118.
Singh, H.P., Sharma, A., and Chanda, N., “Study of Strength Characteristics of Coir Reinforced Soil”. International Conference on Advances in Material and Techniques for Infrastructure Development, 2011; held at NIT Calicut Kerala, India. Paper No.: G002 28-30 September.
Lawton E.C., Khire, M.V. and Fox, N.S., “Reinforcement of soils by multioriented geosynthetic inclusion”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993; 119 (2), 257-275.
Consoli, N.C., Montardo, J.P., Prietto, P.D.M. and Pasa, G.S., “Engineering behavior of sand reinforced with plastic waste”. J. Geotech Geoenviron. Eng., 2002; 128 (6), 462-472.
Ranjan, G., Vasan, R.M. and Charan, H.D., (1996), “Probabilistic analysis of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced soil”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996; 122 (6), 419-426.
Rao, A.S. Rao, K.V.N., Sabitha, G. and Suresti K., “Load deformation behavior of fiber-reinforced gravel beds overlying soft clay”. A National Conference on Corrective Engineering Practices in Troublesome Soils, 2006; 187 -190.
Michalowski, R.L. and Cerma'k, J., “Strength anisotropy of fiber reinforced sand”. Comput. Geotech., 2002; 29 (4), 279-299.
Gray, D.H. and Al-Refeai, T., “Behaviour of fabric versus fibre-reinforccd sand”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986; 112 (8), 804-820.