Research on Optimization of Public Service Facilities Land Efficiency in Changchun City Based on Compact City
American Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 4, July 2018, Pages: 123-133
Received: Oct. 17, 2018;
Published: Oct. 18, 2018
Views 320 Downloads 47
Lv Jing, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun, China
Yan Tianjiao, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun, China
With the continuous development of the social economy, the city has a chaotic image of unwarranted expansion, so the proposal of compact cities and stock planning has been very important. Land for public service facilities is a major component of urban functional land, so it can be used to reflect the compactness of urban land. Based on the background of compact city, this paper analyzed the service efficiency of public service facilities land in Changchun City, including land for educational and cultural facilities, sports facilities, medical and health facilities and social welfare facilities. Through GIS and other technical means to process the data, and comprehensive analysis of the number of facilities, spatial distribution and accessibility analysis, the results of spatial allocation were obtained. In order to consider the behavioral factors of human beings, these results were divided into suppliers, suppliers and demanders for comparative analysis, and the influencing factors and their interrelationships leading to these results were obtained. At the same time, this gave specific suggestions on regional control, spatial structure compactness and spatial element allocation from the macro, meso and micro levels. Furthermore, it will give the relevant planning department measures and recommendations about optimizing the space efficiency of land use for public service facilities.
Research on Optimization of Public Service Facilities Land Efficiency in Changchun City Based on Compact City, American Journal of Civil Engineering.
Vol. 6, No. 4,
2018, pp. 123-133.
M. Jenks, E. Burton, K. Williams. The compact city: a sustainable urban form, London: Routledge, 1996.
K. Williams. Urban intensification policies in England: problemsand contradictions, Land Use Policy, 3rd ed, vol. 16.1999, pp. 167–178.
M. Z. Mahriyar, J. H. Rho. The compact city concept in creating resilient city and transportation system in Surabaya, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 135, 2014, pp. 41–49.
M. Hong, F. J. Jin. Ideology and the implication of land use in a compact city, China Land Science, 7rd ed, vol. 24.2010, pp. 10–13, 29.
L. Li, X. P. Huang. The Research on compactness based on analyzing the meaning of “compact”: constructing the system of concepts and indexes for “compactness”, Urban Planning International, 1st ed, wol. 27, 2012, pp. 33–43.
Y. P. Wei, M. Zhao, J. B. WANG. Compact development & land use performance measurements: an applicable expansion of "Thunen - Alonso" model, Urban Planning Forum, 3rd ed, 2008, pp. 32–40.
M. B. Teitz. Toward a theory of public facility location. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1st ed, vol. 21, 1968, pp. 35-51.
R. Rich. Neglected issues in the study of urban service distribution: A research agenda. Urban Studies, 2nd ed, vol. 16, 1979, pp.143-156.
R. Lineberry. Equality and Urban Policy: The Distribution of Municipal Public Service. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.
G. DeVerteuil. Reconsidering the legacy of urban public facility location theory in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1st ed, vol. 24, 2000, pp. 47-69.
Y. Ding. Fotheringham A S. The integration of spatial analysis and GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1st ed, vol. 16, 1992, pp. 3-19.
J. Pickles. Tool or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2nd ed, vol. 87, 1997, pp. 363-372.
T. Neutens, T. Schwanen, F. Witlox, et al. Social equity of public service delivery: A comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment and Planning A, 7rd ed, vol. 42, 2010, pp. 1613-1615.
R. Miranda, I. Tunyavong. Patterned inequality? Reexamining the role of distributive politics in urban service delivery. Urban Affairs a Quarterly, 4rd ed, vol. 29, 1994, pp. 509-534.
E. Talen. Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1st ed, vol. 64, 1998, pp. 22-38.
W. G. Hansen. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 2nd ed, vol. 25, 1959, pp. 73-76.
S. L. Handy, D. A. Niemeier, S. L. Handy, et al. Measuring Accessibility: an Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment & Planning A, 7th ed, vol. 29, 1997, pp. 1175-1194.
T. Neutens, T. Schwanen. F. Witlox, et al. Social equity of public service delivery: A comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment and Planning A, 7th ed, vol. 42, 2010, pp. 1613-1615.
X. P. Wang, P. Hu, S. S. Shen, et al. Spatial characters of public service facilities from social differentiation viewpoint. Planners, 5th ed, vol. 30, 2014, pp. 17-24.
Y. Tan, C. Pi, D. J. He, et al. Spatial characteristics and their causes of the urban and rural public service facilities in Guangzhou. Tropical Geography, 2nd ed, vol. 34, 2014, pp. 241-247.
M. Apaydin, A. Singh, D. Brutlag, and J.-C. Latombe, “Capturing molecular energy landscapes with probabilistic conformational roadmaps,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2001, pp. 932–939.