Discussion on Detection Method of Continuous Compaction Control Technology in Filling Engineering
American Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 4, July 2019, Pages: 113-120
Received: Sep. 8, 2019;
Published: Oct. 23, 2019
Views 244 Downloads 98
Yu Qi, Bureau Public Work of Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen, China
Jiang Huihuang, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing, China; Shenzhen Research and Design Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Shenzhen, China
Gao Mingxian, Shenzhen Research and Design Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Shenzhen, China
Xiang Weiguo, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing, China
Yan Xiaoxia, Shenzhen Research and Design Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Shenzhen, China
Wu Longliang, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing, China
Follow on us
Compared with the traditional sampling quality detection method, the continuous compaction control technology has significant advantages in real time, full range and comprehensiveness. Therefore, this technology has gradually been widely used in the filling project. However, there are more than ten kinds of continuous compaction control methods, and the applicability of each method is different. Therefore, in order to promote the continuous application of continuous compaction control technology in China. The basic principles of various testing methods for continuous compaction control technology of filling engineering are summarized. The existing continuous compaction control technology testing methods are divided into four categories: (1) compaction method; (2) stiffness/modulus Method; (3) kinetic method; (4) energy method. The calculation process and supporting equipment of each detection method are introduced respectively. The applicability of various methods is analyzed based on the basic theory of various methods. The applicable scope and application suggestions of each detection method are proposed. The results show that the compaction method and energy method can be applied to fine-grained fillers, and the stiffness/modulus method and kinetic method can be applied to coarse-grained fillers and asphalt mixtures. According to the specific engineering conditions, the selection of suitable testing methods for continuous compaction control can obtain satisfactory application results.
Continuous Compaction Control, Detection Method, Applicability, Compaction Method
To cite this article
Discussion on Detection Method of Continuous Compaction Control Technology in Filling Engineering, American Journal of Civil Engineering.
Vol. 7, No. 4,
2019, pp. 113-120.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Xu Guanghui. Dynamic principle and engineering application of continuous compaction control of roadbed [M], Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
Tian Limin. Discussion on Compaction Standard and Acceptance Standard of Railway Subgrade of Passenger Dedicated Line [J]. Railway Standard Design, 2007 (11), pp. 1-4.
Zhang Jialing, Xu Guanghui, Cai Ying. Study on quality inspection and control of continuous compaction roadbed [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36 (04), pp. 1141- 1146.
Minnesota Department of Transportation. Mn/DOT Specification 2106 Pilot Specification for Embankment Grading Materials [S]. St Paul: Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Research Services, 2007.
Michael A. Mooney, Robert V. Rinehart, Norman W. Facas, et al. “Intelligent Soil Compaction Systems.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 676 [R]. Washington, D. C.: Transportation Research Board, 2010.
Fan Juan, Song Xiaodong, Tian Lifeng, Nie Zhihong. Analysis of influencing factors of continuous compaction quality inspection index CMV for high-speed railway subgrade [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2015, 12 (03), pp. 463-467.
Anderegg, R., K. Kaufmann. “Intelligent Compaction with Vibratory Rollers.” Transportation Research Record 1868 [R]. Washington, D. C.: Transportation Research Board, 2004.
Petersen, L. Continuous Compaction Control MnROAD Demonstration. Final report submitted to Mn/DOT, Report No. MN/RC-2005-07 [R]. St Paul: Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2005.
XU Guang-hui, YAN Ze-hua. Study on the Limitation of Harmonic Ratio Index in the Method of Compaction in Continuous Compaction Control Technology [J]. Road Machinery & Construction Mechanization, 2015, 32 (08), pp. 39-42.
Thumer H, Sandstrom A. Continuous compaction control, CCC [C]//European Workshop Compaction of Soils and Granular Materials, Presses Fonts et Chaussees, Paris, France. 2000, pp. 237-246.
Nohse Y, Kitano M. Development of a new type of single drum vibratory roller [C]//Proc. 14th Intl. Conf. of the Intl. Soc. For Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Vicksburg, MS. 2002, pp. 1 -10.
Krober W, Floss R, Wallrath W. Dynamic soil stiffness as quality criterion for soil compaction [J]. Geotechnics for roads, rail tracks, and earth structures, 2001, pp. 188-199.
Zhang Jialing. Study on the uniformity of support stiffness of continuously compacted ballastless track subgrade structure [D]. Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014.
China Railway Corporation. Q/CR 9210-2015 Technical Specification for Continuous Compaction Control of Railway Subgrade Filling Project [S]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2017.
Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. JT/T 1127-2017 Technical Conditions for Continuous Compaction Control System for Highway Subgrade Filling Project [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2017.
European Committee for Standardization. PD CEN/TS 17006:2016 Earthworks Continuous Compaction Con- trol [S]. London: BSI Standards Limited, 2017.