Formation Mechanism and Clinical Application of the Dominant Eye
International Journal of Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2020, Pages: 47-52
Received: Mar. 12, 2020; Accepted: Mar. 26, 2020; Published: Apr. 7, 2020
Views 233      Downloads 93
Authors
Qiu Liping, Department of Medical College, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
Wang Hua, Center for Ophthalmic Optics, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, Changsha, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Eye dominance is often defined as a preference for the visual input of one eye to the other. The dominant eye is a common human side of the functional advantages and is significant for clinical diagnosis and treatment of eye disease. While significant research has been performed on the dominant eye, researchers are still unable to come to a general consensus because they are unable to delve deeply into researching the dominant eye in more details. This is very much unlike the study of the human limbs as, over the years, scientists have been able to successfully research its functionality in every aspect. Research from the dominant eye is divided into three phases: Pre-critical, critical period, after the critical period. Ocular dominance is the advantage of a three-dimensional situation, including sighting, movement, acuity, representing different aspects respectively. There are different advantage aspects with different inspection methods. The dominant eye in oblique amblyopia treatment, optometry, refractive surgery has an important application value. With the rapid development of marginal disciplines such as brain science, neurodevelopment, and neurobiology, the rapid advancement and widespread application of neuroelectrophysiology and optical imaging technology have led to deeper research and understanding of the dominant eyes. The purpose of this article is to assess the focus on the dominant eye formation mechanism, inspection methods and review the status of clinical diagnosis and the treatment of eye diseases.
Keywords
Dominant Eye, Formation Mechanism, Dominant Eye Measurement
To cite this article
Qiu Liping, Wang Hua, Formation Mechanism and Clinical Application of the Dominant Eye, International Journal of Ophthalmology & Visual Science. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2020, pp. 47-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijovs.20200502.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Pointer J S. Sighting dominance, handedness, and visual acuity preference: three mutually exclusive modalities? [J]. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2001, 21 (2): 117–126.
[2]
Guntram Kommerell, Christina Schmitt, Miriam Kromeier, Michael Bach. Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance [J]. Vision Research, 2003, 43 (12)
[3]
Jiang Feng, Huang YiFei, Zhang Bin. Dominant Eye Typing and Clinical Research Progress [J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 2015, 17 (6): 381
[4]
Reiss MR. Ocular dominance: some family data. Laterality. 1997; 2: 7-16
[5]
Yu Lu, Zhao kanXing. A Study on the Dominant Column and Its Plasticity in Visual Development [J]. International Review of Ophthalmology, 2007, 31 (06): 403-406.
[6]
Sengpiel F, Blakemore C, Kind PC, Harrad R. Interocular suppression in the visual cortex of strabismic cats. J Neurosci
[7]
Sengpiel F, Kind P C. The role of activity in development of the visual system [J]. Curr Bio, 2002, 12 (23) 818
[8]
Crowley J C, Katz L C. Ocular dominance development revisited [J]. Cur Opin In Neurobiol, 2002, 12 (1) 104
[9]
Huberman A D, Speer C M, Chapman B. Spontaneous Retinal Activity Mediates Development of Ocular Dominance Columns and Binocular Receptive Fields in V1 [J]. Neuron, 2006, 52 (2): 247-254.
[10]
Foutch BK. The Dominant Eye: Dominant for Parvo-But Not for Magno-Biased Stimuli? Vision (Basel) 2020; 4: DOI: 10.3390/vision4010019.
[11]
Hofer SB, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Bonhoeffer T, Hubener M. Prior experience enhances plasticity in adult visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jan, 9 (1): 127-132.
[12]
Lickey ME, Pham TA, Gordon B Swept contrast visual evoked potentials and their plasticity following monocular deprivation in mice. Vision Res. 2004, 44 (28) 3381-7
[13]
Moshkovitz A, Lev M. Monocular and Binocular Temporal Visual Perception of Infantile Nystagmus. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 4946. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61914-2.
[14]
Melissa L. Rice, David A. Leske, Christina E. Smestad, Jonathan M. Holmes. Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method [J]. Journal of AAPOS, 2008, 12 (4).
[15]
Li KeJia, Liu Han Qiang. Comparison of three different methods for examination of dominant eye [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, 9 (03): 502-503.
[16]
Ukai K. Ando H. Kuze Binocular rivalry alternation rate declines with age Percept Motor Skills 2003: 97: 393-397
[17]
Handda T, Uozato H, Higa R, et al Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 831-836.
[18]
Heinrich SP, Kromeier M. Bach M. Kommerell G. Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence. Vis Res 2005: 45: 1321-1328
[19]
Lopes-Ferreira D, Neves H. Queiros A. et al. Ocular dominance and visual function testing [J]. Biomed Res Int. 2013: 238943
[20]
Yang E. Blake R, McDonald JE. A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51 (I): 588-93
[21]
Qiu KaiKai, Zhang ShaoBin, Zhou ZhongXia. Comparison of the measurement results of dominant eyes with worth four- point method and hole-card method under the condition of refraction habit correction and full correction [J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology, 2006 (01): 36-38.
[22]
Kamis U, Gunduz K, Okudan N, et al. Relationship between Eye Dominance and Pattern Electroretinograms in Normal Human Subjects [J]. International Journal of Neuroscience, 2005, 115 (2): 185-192.
[23]
Dane S, GüMüSTEKIN, KENAN. CORRELATION BETWEEN HAND PREFERENCE AND DISTANCE OF FOCUSING POINTS OF TWO EYES IN THE HORIZONTAL PLANE [J]. International Journal of Neuroscience, 2002, 112 (10): 1141-1147.
[24]
Zheng Lianbin, ZhouDan. A Study on the Characteristics of Seven Asymmetric Behaviors of the Han Nationality in Tianjin [J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2003 (04): 19-22.
[25]
Zheng LianBin, Li Shuyuan, Han ZaiZhu, Lu ShunHua. Human asymmetric behavior characteristics [J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2001 (03): 58-61.
[26]
Yu YueSheng, Cao MingXian, Wang keSong, Jie JuQuan, Luo ZaiGang, Li ZhongYan. A Study on the Characteristics of Asymmetric Behavior of Eight Ethnic Groups in Guizhou [J]. Guizhou Medicine, 2004 (04): 373-376.
[27]
Linke SJ, Baviera J, Munzer G, Steinberg J, Richard G, Katz T. Association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex: analysis of 10, 264 myopic individuals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 9166-9173.
[28]
Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD, et al. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev. 1996; 18: 175–187.
[29]
Eser I, Durrie DS, Schwendeman F, Stahl JE. Association between ocular dominance and refraction. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24: 685-689.
[30]
Yang Z, Lan W, Liu W, et al. Association of ocular dominance and myopia development: a 2-year longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 4779-4783.
[31]
Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, Hsia WW, Hsu WM. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 2856-2860.
[32]
Goss DA, Wickham MG. Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization: a literature review. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995; 90: 341-375.
[33]
Mapp AP, Ono H Barbeito R. What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept Psychophys. 2003: 65: 310-317.
[34]
Porac C. The dominant eye. Psychol Bull. 1976: 83: 880-897
[35]
Le Vay S. Stryker MP, sha-tz CJ Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: a quantitative study. J Comp Neurol. 1978.179: 223-244
[36]
Ibi K. Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and nondominant eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997; 17: 44-54.
[37]
Ito M, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, et al. Association Between Ocular Dominance and Refractive Asymmetry [J]. Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N. J.: 1995), 2013, 29 (10): 1-5.
[38]
Wang Q, Wu Y, Liu W, Gao L. Dominant Eye and Visual Evoked Potential of Patients with Myopic Anisometropia. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 5064892.
[39]
Nimet nay Gundoan. Two methods to study the relationship between the dominant eye and the left / right hand of college students (English) [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, 9 (12): 2273-2277.
[40]
Li Xia, Gao XiaoWei, Lei Ying. Clinical observation on the relationship between adolescent myopia and right-handedness [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, 9 (10): 2011-2012.
[41]
Zhu ReYuan, Qu XiaoMei. The meaning and implementation of medical optometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology, 2002 (02): 116-117.
[42]
John T. Flynn, Zhou YiDing. Revisiting amblyopia [J]. Foreign Medicine. Ophthalmology, 1992 (06): 361-365.
[43]
Quah BL, Lu Y, Smith D. The association of ocular dominance and the preferred eye for fixation in intermittent exotropia: a guide to choosing the eye for unilateral surgery. Am Orthopt J 2001; 51: 111-115
[44]
Jin Wook Jeoung, Min Joung Lee, Jeong-Min Hwang. Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Unilateral Recess-Resect Procedure for Exotropia With a Dominant Eye [J]. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2005, 141 (4).
[45]
Li KeJi, LiuHanQiang. Study of ocular dominance's changes in myopic patient after LASIK [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, 9 (01): 107-110.
[46]
Luo WuQiang, Liu Weimin, Huang jianzhong, Xiao Xin, Zhao WuXiao, Lin Quan. Clinical observation of dominant eye transition before and after LASIK surgery [J]. Guangxi Medical, 2010, 32 (12): 1475-1477.
[47]
Wang YuLong. Research of dominant eye changes and effect on satisfaction after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis [D]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2010.
[48]
Hu YuKun, Gao XiaoWei, Li XiaoHong, Xu LiQun, Guo YunLin. Clinical observation of monovision with LASIK for correction of refractive errors with concomitant presbyopia [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2008 (05): 971-972.
[49]
Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK & Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 2919–2926.
[50]
Charman WN. Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 8–29.
[51]
Ravikumar S, Bradley A, Bharadwaj S & Thibos LN. Expanding binocular depth of focus by combining monovision with diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 1288–1296.
[52]
Legras R, Hornain V, Monot A & Chateau N. Effect of induced anisometropia on binocular through-focus contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 503–509.
[53]
Xiao J, Jiang C. Visual outcomes of LASIK-induced monovision in myopic patients with presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 557; author reply 557-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.015
[54]
Bennett ES. Contact lens correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2008; 91: 265–278.
[55]
Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Grant T & Chong MS. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 858–862.
[56]
Gupta N, Naroo SA & Wolffsohn JS. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E98–E105.
[57]
Stein HA. The management of presbyopia with contact lenses: a review. CLAO J 1990; 16: 33–38.
[58]
Johannsdottir KR & Stelmach LB. Monovision: a review of the scientific literature. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 646–651.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186