International Journal of Agricultural Economics

| Peer-Reviewed |

Analysis of Productive Resources of Maize Crop Among Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Received: 28 June 2017    Accepted: 07 July 2017    Published: 15 August 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This study examined productive resources of maize crop among farming households in Ekiti State, Nigeria. The study used multistage sampling techniques. Data were collected from 120 maize farmers through well-structured questionnaires from three Local Government Areas of Ekiti State. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, and stochastic frontier regression model. Results from descriptive analysis showed that 30 percent of the maize farmers had secondary school education and above. Majority of the respondents (66.70%) had between 5 and 8 members that made up the household in the study area. It was revealed through the study that the majority of the respondents produced on a fairly large scale with average maize farm size of 3.39 hectares. Also, 80.0% of the maize farmers in the study area had more than 15 years farming experience. With profit of ₦116,590 per hectare and percentage profit of 58.63%, the venture is considered to be highly profitable. Farmers who invested ₦1 realized revenue of ₦1.59. The level of technical efficiency in maize production in Ekiti State ranged from 29.8% to 96.5% with a mean of 64.3%. This means that there are substantial opportunities to increase productivity and income through more efficient utilization of productive resources The RTS parameter (0.931) was obtained from the summation of the coefficients of the estimated inputs (elasticities) which indicates that maize production in the study area was in the Stage II of the production surface. Depreciation, hired labour, family labour, farm size and quantity of seed are the major farm specific variables that influence efficiency of the maize farmers while farming experience, extension access, land acquisition and access to credit contributed to technical inefficiency. It is therefore suggested that effort should be geared towards increasing the technical manpower of farmers, land redistribution policy that will increase the farm size of farmers in order to boost maize production should be encouraged; and in order to increase farmers’ profit, variable costs have to be cut down, since the bulk of the variable cost is incurred on labour, which would lead to greater gross margins and hence the profitability of the enterprise.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11
Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 2, Issue 5, September 2017)
Page(s) 142-148
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Productive Resources, Maize Crop, Budgetary Analysis, Technical Efficiency

References
[1] Food and Agriculture Organization (2003). FAOSTAT http://faosata.fao.org/ default.htmm
[2] World Bank Washington, D.C, Mimeo 2003. World Development Indicators, 2003. Washington, D. C. CD-ROM.
[3] Central Bank of Nigeria. (2003): Annual Report and Statement of Accounts. Abuja, Nigeria: CBN Publication.
[4] International Fund for Agricultural Development (2002). Annual Report Lusaka.
[5] Kuriuki D. K, Ritho C. N and Muneik.2008. Analysis of the Effect of Land Tenure on Technical Efficiency in Smallholder Crop production in Kenya. Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development. Tropentag.
[6] FMARD. (2001). Agricultural Policy Thrust. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Food and Agriculture Organization (2003): FAOSTAT http://faosata.fao.org/default.htmm International Fund for Agricultural Development (2002): Annual Report. Lusaka.
[7] Fasasi, O. S. (2008). Functional and Visco-Elastic Properties of Traditional Processed Quality Protein Maize (QPM) Seed Flour Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference of the School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Akure, Nigeria: 22 24.
[8] Osundahunsi, O. F. and Aworh, O. C. (2000): Moisture Equilibra of Tempe-Fortified Maize –Based Complementary Foods. Applied Tropical Agriculture 5: 41 47.
[9] Ristanovic, D. (2001): Maize In: R. H Raemaekers (Editor) Crop Production in Tropical Africa. Goekint Graphics nv. Belgium. pp 23-45.
[10] Oladeebo, J. O. (2004): Resource-Use Efficiency of Small and Large Scale Farmer in South Western Nigeria: Implication of Food Security. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Research. Vol. 1, No. 12, Pp 227-235.
[11] Awoke M. U. and C. Okorji (2004). The Determination and Analysis of Constraints in Resource Use Efficiency in Multiple Cropping Systems by Small- holder Farmers in Ebonyi State, Nigeria Africa Development. 2004; Vol. xxix, No. 3, Pp. 58-69.
[12] Likita, T. (2005): Technical Efficiency in Arable Crop Production in Kebbi State Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Food Science. Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 165-174.
[13] Ajayi S. T (2005). Cattle Productivity in Nigeria; Problems and Prospects”. A paper presented at the National Workshop on Improving Productivity in Cattle farming in Nigeria. Organized by The National Productivity Centre on 21st 22nd September 2005 in Kaduna State, Kaduna, Nigeria.
[14] Saliu O. J., S. O. Ukwuteno and D. O. Ekpa (2006): Constrains in the Adoption of Improved Oil Palm Technology among Small Scale Farmers in Dekina Local Government Area of Kogi State. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Studies 4(3): 29-32.
[15] Battese, G. E. and Coelli, T. J. (1996): “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Delta”. Empirical Economics 20: 325- 335.
[16] Ajibefun, I. A. and Daramola, A (2002): Inefficiency of production of farmers under the National Directorate of in Ondo State, Nigeria. Applied Economic Letters, Routledge, 6. 111-114.
[17] Ogundari, K. and S. Ojo (2007). Economic Efficiency of small scale food crop production in Nigeria: A stochastic frontier approach, Journal of Social Sciences, vol 14, no. 2, pp 123 -130.
Author Information
  • Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Services, Ekiti State University, Ado – Ekiti, Nigeria

  • Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Services, Ekiti State University, Ado – Ekiti, Nigeria

  • Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Services, Ekiti State University, Ado – Ekiti, Nigeria

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Owoeye R. S., Adetule F. S., Ajayi G. T. (2017). Analysis of Productive Resources of Maize Crop Among Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(5), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Owoeye R. S.; Adetule F. S.; Ajayi G. T. Analysis of Productive Resources of Maize Crop Among Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2017, 2(5), 142-148. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Owoeye R. S., Adetule F. S., Ajayi G. T. Analysis of Productive Resources of Maize Crop Among Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Int J Agric Econ. 2017;2(5):142-148. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11,
      author = {Owoeye R. S. and Adetule F. S. and Ajayi G. T.},
      title = {Analysis of Productive Resources of Maize Crop Among Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria},
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {142-148},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20170205.11},
      abstract = {This study examined productive resources of maize crop among farming households in Ekiti State, Nigeria. The study used multistage sampling techniques. Data were collected from 120 maize farmers through well-structured questionnaires from three Local Government Areas of Ekiti State. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, and stochastic frontier regression model. Results from descriptive analysis showed that 30 percent of the maize farmers had secondary school education and above. Majority of the respondents (66.70%) had between 5 and 8 members that made up the household in the study area. It was revealed through the study that the majority of the respondents produced on a fairly large scale with average maize farm size of 3.39 hectares. Also, 80.0% of the maize farmers in the study area had more than 15 years farming experience. With profit of ₦116,590 per hectare and percentage profit of 58.63%, the venture is considered to be highly profitable. Farmers who invested ₦1 realized revenue of ₦1.59. The level of technical efficiency in maize production in Ekiti State ranged from 29.8% to 96.5% with a mean of 64.3%. This means that there are substantial opportunities to increase productivity and income through more efficient utilization of productive resources The RTS parameter (0.931) was obtained from the summation of the coefficients of the estimated inputs (elasticities) which indicates that maize production in the study area was in the Stage II of the production surface. Depreciation, hired labour, family labour, farm size and quantity of seed are the major farm specific variables that influence efficiency of the maize farmers while farming experience, extension access, land acquisition and access to credit contributed to technical inefficiency. It is therefore suggested that effort should be geared towards increasing the technical manpower of farmers, land redistribution policy that will increase the farm size of farmers in order to boost maize production should be encouraged; and in order to increase farmers’ profit, variable costs have to be cut down, since the bulk of the variable cost is incurred on labour, which would lead to greater gross margins and hence the profitability of the enterprise.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Analysis of Productive Resources of Maize Crop Among Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria
    AU  - Owoeye R. S.
    AU  - Adetule F. S.
    AU  - Ajayi G. T.
    Y1  - 2017/08/15
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 142
    EP  - 148
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20170205.11
    AB  - This study examined productive resources of maize crop among farming households in Ekiti State, Nigeria. The study used multistage sampling techniques. Data were collected from 120 maize farmers through well-structured questionnaires from three Local Government Areas of Ekiti State. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, and stochastic frontier regression model. Results from descriptive analysis showed that 30 percent of the maize farmers had secondary school education and above. Majority of the respondents (66.70%) had between 5 and 8 members that made up the household in the study area. It was revealed through the study that the majority of the respondents produced on a fairly large scale with average maize farm size of 3.39 hectares. Also, 80.0% of the maize farmers in the study area had more than 15 years farming experience. With profit of ₦116,590 per hectare and percentage profit of 58.63%, the venture is considered to be highly profitable. Farmers who invested ₦1 realized revenue of ₦1.59. The level of technical efficiency in maize production in Ekiti State ranged from 29.8% to 96.5% with a mean of 64.3%. This means that there are substantial opportunities to increase productivity and income through more efficient utilization of productive resources The RTS parameter (0.931) was obtained from the summation of the coefficients of the estimated inputs (elasticities) which indicates that maize production in the study area was in the Stage II of the production surface. Depreciation, hired labour, family labour, farm size and quantity of seed are the major farm specific variables that influence efficiency of the maize farmers while farming experience, extension access, land acquisition and access to credit contributed to technical inefficiency. It is therefore suggested that effort should be geared towards increasing the technical manpower of farmers, land redistribution policy that will increase the farm size of farmers in order to boost maize production should be encouraged; and in order to increase farmers’ profit, variable costs have to be cut down, since the bulk of the variable cost is incurred on labour, which would lead to greater gross margins and hence the profitability of the enterprise.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections