| Peer-Reviewed

Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnut Markets: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State

Received: 17 February 2019    Accepted: 22 March 2019    Published: 26 April 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This paper looks at and assesses the structure, conduct and performance of groundnut markets in Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. Households and traders concerned in groundnut were interviewed for obtaining primary data. The study was conducted by incorporating from two kebeles of 175 groundnut producing households and seven markets of 34 traders. A multi stage sampling procedures were employed to select sample producers while for groundnut traders snowball sampling techniques was used. The result shows that nine major groundnut marketing channels were identified and using the respondents a total of 7432.8 quintals of groundnuts were transacted in 2015/16 production season and among its rural assemblers and urban wholesalers purchased about 66.7% and 29.33% of the total produce respectively. The analysis of the market structure indicates that the concentration ratio of 76.61% at Bahirdar market, which shows an oligopolistic market structure and which resulted in a groundnut market conduct characterized by a market strategy in which the traders have an upper hand in fixing the price of the groundnut as well as effecting payment by the time in favor of the traders. Concerning the market performance, the findings show that the benefit from groundnut marketing is skewed to few actors in the market chain. Notably, street vendors had the highest gross marketing margin with estimated share of 51% found in the channel III and followed processors and urban retailers with estimated share of 43.7% and 38.89% in channel I and II of the consumer’s price respectively. The highest total gross marketing margin found in channel IX which accounts for 64.81% of the consumer’s price and followed by channel VII and VIII which accounts each with estimated share of 64.05% of the consumer’s price. The lowest producers’ share is appropriated in channel IX which accounts 35.19% of the consumer’s price. The findings from this study, so strongly recommended that establishing well organized cooperatives for reducing the inefficiency due to high marketing margin as well as the oligopolistic market structure.

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 4, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13
Page(s) 55-69
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Groundnut Market, Structure, Conduct, Performance, Fogera Woreda

References
[1] Abay Akalu 2007. Vegetable Market Chain Analysis in Amhara National Regional State: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar. MSc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Graduate Studies, Haramaya University.77-78pp.
[2] Abrham Feyissa 2009, Grain marketing and Livelihoods in Ethiopia. A case of structure, conduct and performance of grain market in Lume Wereda of Oromia region.4pp
[3] Alemnew Abay 2010. Market Chain Analysis of Red Pepper: The Case of Bure Woreda, West Gojjam Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, presented to the School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Management, Haramaya University. 10pp.
[4] ADLI (Agricultural Development Lead Industrialization), 2001. Rural Development Policies and Strategies: Department of press and Audiovisual, Ministry of Information. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.2pp.
[5] Astewel Takele 2010. Analysis of Rice Profitability and Marketing Chain: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, presented to the College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Graduate Studies, Haramaya University.76pp.
[6] Bain, J. S. (1968). Industrial Organization, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[7] Berhane Sibhatu, Guesh Tekle and Melesse Harfe. 2016. Response of groundnut to different rates of phosphorus fertilizer at Tanqua- Abergelle District, Northern Ethiopia. Basic Research Journal. 5(1). 24-29.
[8] BOARD (Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development). 2016. The Woreda Annual report, Woreta.
[9] Cramer, G. L. and Jensen, W. 1982. Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill Book Company, USA. 222pp.
[10] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2009. Agricultural sample survey.2009. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[11] Daniel Admasu, Wondafrash Mulugeta, and Sintayehu Admas.2007. Performance of groundnut varieties in the lowlands of North Shewa. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Regional Conference on Completed Crops Research Activities18 - 21 September 2007, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
[12] Eleni Gebre-Medhin, 2003. Market institutions, transaction costs, and social capital in the Ethiopian grain market. International Food Policy Research Institute. USA.
[13] Geleta, T., Purshotum K. S., Wijnand S., Tana T. (2007). Integrated management of groundnut root rot using seed quality. International Journal of Pest Management.
[14] Gelgelo Kibi 2014. Design and Development of Groundnut Sheller. MSc. Thesis, Presented to the School of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Graduate Studies, Haramaya University.
[15] Habekiristos Beyene. 2016. Large and Medium Scale Commercial Farms Annual Survey, the Domino Effect of World Bank Intervention, Challenges and Innovative Approaches the Experience of Ethiopia. Director of Agriculture, Natural Resource and Environment Statistics Washington DC. pp.3.
[16] IPMS (Improved Productivity and Market Success).2016. Fogera Wereda pilot learning Site Diagnosis and program Design, Woreta.
[17] Jema Haji, 2008. An Economic Efficiency and Marketing Performance of Vegetables in Eastern and Central part of Ethiopia doctorial thesis, Nov., 2008, Sweden.
[18] Jenkins, K. and Phiri, D. 2009. Peace Corps Zambia. Life Pre-Service Training Technical Manual.
[19] Joseph Dzanja and Bonnet Kamwana.2014. Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnuts Markets in Northern and Central Malawi: Case Studies of Mzimba and Kasungu Districts. Department of Agribusiness Management, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe Malawi. 5(6). 132-137.
[20] Kindie Aysheshm 2007. Sesame Market Chain Analysis: The Case of Metema Woreda, North Gondar Zone, Amhara National Regional State. MSc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Graduate Studies, Haramaya University.1-38pp.
[21] Kohl, R. L. and Uhl, J. N. 1985, Marketing of Agricultural Product, 5th Edition, Collier Macmillan, USA. 624pp.
[22] Mendoza, G. 1995. A primer on marketing channels and margins. Lyme Rimer Publishers Inc, USA
[23] NBE (National Bank of Ethiopia).2013. National Bank of Ethiopia Annual Report 2012/13. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[24] Odendo M and De Groote.2007. Linking Producers to Markets: The case of Grain Marketing Information in Western Kenya. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), Nairobi, Kenya.
[25] Pender J., Ruben R., Jabbar M. and Eleni, Gebre-Medhin.2004. Policies for improved land management and agricultural land management and agricultural market development in the Ethiopian highlands. In: Proceedings of summary of papers workshop, February 19-20, 2004, IFPRI, held at Ghion Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 3-24.
[26] Rehima Mussema 2006. Analysis of Red Pepper Marketing: the case of Alaba and Silitie in SNNPRS, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis Presented to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. 43-103pp.
[27] Scarborough, V. and Kiddy, J. 1992. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Markets: A manual. Chatham, U. K. Natural Resource Institute.
[28] Shughart, William F. 1990. The Organization of Industry. Richard O. Irwin Inc, U.S.A.
[29] Thomas, C. R. and Maurice, S. C. (2011) Managerial Economics: Foundations of Business Analysis and Strategy, 10th Edition.
[30] Wijnands, J. H. M., Biersteker J., Van Loo E. N. 2009. Oil seed business opportunity in Ethiopia. Oil seed research report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[31] Wolday Amha and Eleni G/medhin, 2003. An analysis of the Structure, Conduct, and Performance of the Ethiopian Grain Market, Addis Ababa.
[32] Wolday, Amha. 1994. Food Grain Marketing Development in Ethiopia after Reform 1990, a Case Study of Alaba Siraro. The PhD Dissertation, Presented to Verlag Koster University.
[33] Yamane, Taro. 1967. Statistics, an Introductory Analysis. 2nd ed. New York-Harper and Row.
[34] Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., Zhou, N. and Su, C. 2008. Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality and firm performance: Evidence from China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(9): 985-1000.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wubalem Gobie, Teshale Wolde Amanuel, Tewodros Tefera. (2019). Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnut Markets: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4(2), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wubalem Gobie; Teshale Wolde Amanuel; Tewodros Tefera. Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnut Markets: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2019, 4(2), 55-69. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wubalem Gobie, Teshale Wolde Amanuel, Tewodros Tefera. Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnut Markets: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. Int J Agric Econ. 2019;4(2):55-69. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13,
      author = {Wubalem Gobie and Teshale Wolde Amanuel and Tewodros Tefera},
      title = {Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnut Markets: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State},
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {4},
      number = {2},
      pages = {55-69},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20190402.13},
      abstract = {This paper looks at and assesses the structure, conduct and performance of groundnut markets in Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. Households and traders concerned in groundnut were interviewed for obtaining primary data. The study was conducted by incorporating from two kebeles of 175 groundnut producing households and seven markets of 34 traders. A multi stage sampling procedures were employed to select sample producers while for groundnut traders snowball sampling techniques was used. The result shows that nine major groundnut marketing channels were identified and using the respondents a total of 7432.8 quintals of groundnuts were transacted in 2015/16 production season and among its rural assemblers and urban wholesalers purchased about 66.7% and 29.33% of the total produce respectively. The analysis of the market structure indicates that the concentration ratio of 76.61% at Bahirdar market, which shows an oligopolistic market structure and which resulted in a groundnut market conduct characterized by a market strategy in which the traders have an upper hand in fixing the price of the groundnut as well as effecting payment by the time in favor of the traders. Concerning the market performance, the findings show that the benefit from groundnut marketing is skewed to few actors in the market chain. Notably, street vendors had the highest gross marketing margin with estimated share of 51% found in the channel III and followed processors and urban retailers with estimated share of 43.7% and 38.89% in channel I and II of the consumer’s price respectively. The highest total gross marketing margin found in channel IX which accounts for 64.81% of the consumer’s price and followed by channel VII and VIII which accounts each with estimated share of 64.05% of the consumer’s price. The lowest producers’ share is appropriated in channel IX which accounts 35.19% of the consumer’s price. The findings from this study, so strongly recommended that establishing well organized cooperatives for reducing the inefficiency due to high marketing margin as well as the oligopolistic market structure.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Structure, Conduct and Performance of Groundnut Markets: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State
    AU  - Wubalem Gobie
    AU  - Teshale Wolde Amanuel
    AU  - Tewodros Tefera
    Y1  - 2019/04/26
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 55
    EP  - 69
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190402.13
    AB  - This paper looks at and assesses the structure, conduct and performance of groundnut markets in Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. Households and traders concerned in groundnut were interviewed for obtaining primary data. The study was conducted by incorporating from two kebeles of 175 groundnut producing households and seven markets of 34 traders. A multi stage sampling procedures were employed to select sample producers while for groundnut traders snowball sampling techniques was used. The result shows that nine major groundnut marketing channels were identified and using the respondents a total of 7432.8 quintals of groundnuts were transacted in 2015/16 production season and among its rural assemblers and urban wholesalers purchased about 66.7% and 29.33% of the total produce respectively. The analysis of the market structure indicates that the concentration ratio of 76.61% at Bahirdar market, which shows an oligopolistic market structure and which resulted in a groundnut market conduct characterized by a market strategy in which the traders have an upper hand in fixing the price of the groundnut as well as effecting payment by the time in favor of the traders. Concerning the market performance, the findings show that the benefit from groundnut marketing is skewed to few actors in the market chain. Notably, street vendors had the highest gross marketing margin with estimated share of 51% found in the channel III and followed processors and urban retailers with estimated share of 43.7% and 38.89% in channel I and II of the consumer’s price respectively. The highest total gross marketing margin found in channel IX which accounts for 64.81% of the consumer’s price and followed by channel VII and VIII which accounts each with estimated share of 64.05% of the consumer’s price. The lowest producers’ share is appropriated in channel IX which accounts 35.19% of the consumer’s price. The findings from this study, so strongly recommended that establishing well organized cooperatives for reducing the inefficiency due to high marketing margin as well as the oligopolistic market structure.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agribusiness & Value Chain Management, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

  • School of Environment, Gender and Development Studies, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • School of Environment, Gender and Development Studies, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • Sections